The partly hot-water driven CO2 capture plant offers a significant potential for improvement in performance when implemented in a combined-cycle power plant (CCPP). It is possible to achieve the same performance with a dual-pressure steam cycle as in a triple-pressure unit. Even a single-pressure plant can attain an efficiency competitive with that achievable with a triple-pressure plant without the hot-water reboiler. The underlying reasons are better heat utilization in the heat recovery unit and less steam extraction to the absorbent regenerating unit(s). In this paper, the design criteria for a combined cycle power plant utilizing hot-water absorbent regeneration will be examined and presented. The results show that the most suitable plant is one with two steam pressure levels. The low-pressure level should be much higher than in a conventional combined cycle in order to increase the amount of heat available in the economizer. The external heat required in the CO2 capture plant is partly supplied by the economizer, allowing temperature optimization in the unit. The maximum value of the low-pressure level is determined by the reboiler, as too great a temperature difference is unfavorable. This work evaluates the benefits of coupling the economizer and the reboiler in a specially designed CCPP. In the CO2 separation plant both monoethanolamine (MEA) and ammonia are evaluated as absorbents. Higher regeneration temperatures can be tolerated in ammonia-based plants than in MEA-based plants. When using a liquid heat carrier the reboiler temperature is not constant on the hot side, which results in greater temperature differences. The temperature difference can be greatly reduced by dividing the regeneration process into two units operating at different pressures. The possibility of extracting more energy from the economizer to replace part of the extracted steam increases the plant efficiency. The results show that very high efficiencies can be achieved without using multiple pressure-levels.

References

References
1.
Hammer
,
T.
,
Keyser
,
J.
, and
Bolland
,
O.
, 2009, “
Natural Gas Oxy-Fuel Cycles—Part 2: Heat Transfer Analysis of a Gas Turbine
,”
Energy Procedia
,
1
, pp.
557
564.
2.
Rezvani
,
S.
,
Bolland
,
O.
,
Franco
,
F.
,
Huang
,
Y.
,
Span
,
R.
,
Keyser
,
J.
,
Sander
,
F.
,
McIlveen-Wright
,
D.
, and
Hewitt
,
N.
, 2009, “
Natural Gas Oxy-Fuel Cycles—Part 3: Economic Evaluation
,”
Energy Procedia
,
1
, pp.
565
572.
3.
Woollatt
,
G.
, and
Franco
,
F.
, 2009, “
Natural Gas Oxy-Fuel Cycles—Part 1: Conceptual Aerodynamic Design of Turbo-Machinery Components
,”
Energy Procedia
,
1
, pp.
573
580.
4.
Sanz
,
W.
,
Jericha
,
H.
, and
Bauer
,
B.
, 2008, “
Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Two Promising Oxy-Fuel Power Cycles for CO2 Capture
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
130
, pp.
021
032.
5.
Kohl
,
A. L.
, and
Nielsen
,
R. B.
, 1997,
Gas Purification
,
5th
ed.,
Gulf Publishing Co.
,
Houston, TX
.
6.
Fredriksson Möller
,
B.
, 2005,
“A Thermoeconomic Evaluation of CO2 Capture With Focus on Gas Turbine-Based Power Plants,”
PhD thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
7.
Finkenrath
,
M.
,
Ursin
,
T. P.
,
Hoffmann
,
S.
,
Bartlett
,
M.
,
Evulet
,
A.
,
Bowman
,
M. J.
,
Lynghjem
,
A.
, and
Jakobsen
,
J.
, 2007,
“Performance and Cost Analysis of Novel Gas Turbine Cycle With CO2 Capture,”
ASME Turbo Expo, Montreal
,
Canada
.
8.
Botero
,
C.
,
Finkenrath
,
M.
,
Bartlett
,
M.
,
Chu
,
R.
,
Choi
,
G.
, and
Chinn
,
D.
, 2009, “
Redesign, Optimization, and Economic Evaluation of a Natural Gas Combined Cycle With the Best Integrated Technology CO2 Capture
,”
Energy Procedia
,
1
, pp.
3835
3842.
9.
Bolland
,
O.
, and
Mathieu
,
P.
, 1998, “
Comparison of Two CO2 Removal Options in Combined Cycle Power Plants
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
39
, pp.
1653
1663.
10.
Chiesa
,
P.
, and
Consonni
,
S.
, 2000, “
Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycles With Low CO2 Emissions
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
429
, p.
8
.
11.
Jack
,
A. R.
,
Audus
,
H.
, and
Riemer
,
P. W. F.
, “
The IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme
,”
Energy Conversion and Management
,
33
, pp.
813
818.
12.
Kvamsdal
,
H. M.
,
Jordal
,
K.
, and
Bolland
,
O.
, 2007, “
A Quantitative Comparison of Gas Turbine Cycles With CO2 Capture
,”
Energy
,
32
, pp.
10
24.
13.
Zachary
,
J.
, and
Titus
,
S.
, 2008,
“CO2 Capture and Sequestration Options: Impact on Turbo-Machinery Design,”
ASME Turbo Expo
,
Berlin, Germany
.
14.
Mimura
,
T.
,
Shimojo
,
S.
,
Suda
,
T.
,
Iijima
,
M.
, and
Mitsuoka
,
S.
, “
Research and Development on Energy Saving Technology for Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Recovery and Steam System in Power Plant
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
36
, pp.
397
400.
15.
Gal
,
E.
, 2006,
“Ultra Cleaning of Combustion Gas Including the Removal of CO2,”
A. P. Inc.
16.
Darde
,
V.
,
Thomsen
,
K.
,
van Well
,
W. J. M.
, and
Stenby
,
E. H.
, 2009,
“Chilled Ammonia Process for CO2 Capture,”
Energy Procedia
,
1
, pp.
1035
1042
.
17.
Dave
,
N.
,
Do
,
T.
,
Puxty
,
G.
,
Rowland
,
R.
,
Feron
,
P. H. M.
, and
Attalla
,
M. I.
, 2009, “
CO2 Capture by Aqueous Amines and Aqueous Ammonia—A Comparison
,”
Energy Procedia
,
1
, pp.
949
954.
18.
Elkady
,
A. M.
,
Evulet
,
A. T.
,
Brand
,
A.
,
Ursin
,
T. P.
, and
Lynghjem
,
A.
, 2008,
“Exhaust Gas Recirculation in DLN F-class Gas Turbines for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture,”
Proceedings of GT 2008, pp.
9
12
.
19.
Jonshagen
,
K.
,
Sipocz
,
N.
, and
Genrup
,
M.
, 2011, “
A Novel Approach of Retrofitting a Combined Cycle With Post Combustion CO2 Capture
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
133
, pp.
011703
011707.
20.
Walsh
,
P. P.
, and
Fletcher
,
P.
, 2004,
Gas Turbine Performance
,
Blackwell Science
,
Malden, MA
.
21.
Gülen
,
S. C.
,
Griffin
,
P. R.
, and
Paolucci
,
S.
, 2002, “
Real-Time On-Line Performance Diagnostics of Heavy-Duty Industrial Gas Turbines
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
124
, p.
12
.
22.
Traupel
,
W.
, 1977,
Thermische Turbomaschinen
, Vol.
1
,
Springer
,
Berlin
.
23.
IPSEpro, 2003, SimTech Simulation Technology (SimTech), Graz, Austria.
24.
Tomasi
,
L.
, 2005,
“Revamp of CO2 Removal Units With Twin-Parallel Regenerators to Giammarco-Vetrocoke (GV) Low-Energy System with Dual Pressure Regenerators,”
Nitrogen 2005, International Conference and Exhibition, Bucharest, Romania, February 17–March 2, 2005.
You do not currently have access to this content.