One of the most effective factors influencing performance, efficiency, and pollutant emissions of internal combustion engines is the combustion phasing: In gasoline engines, electronic control units (ECUs) manage the spark advance (SA) in order to set the optimal combustion phase. SA is usually optimized on the test bench by changing the ignition angle while monitoring brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) and indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) and brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC). The optimization process relates BMEP, IMEP, and BSFC mean values with the control setting (SA). However, the effect of SA on combustion is not deterministic due to the cycle-to-cycle variation: The analysis of mean values requires many engine cycles to be significant in the performance obtained with the given control setting. This paper presents a novel approach to SA optimization, with the objective of improving the performance analysis robustness while reducing the test time. For a given running condition, IMEP can be considered a function of the combustion phase, represented by the 50% mass fraction burned (50% MFB). Due to cycle-to-cycle variation, different MFB50 and IMEP values are obtained during a steady state test carried out with constant SA, but these values are related by means of a unique relationship. The distribution on the plane IMEP-MFB50 forms a parabola; therefore, the optimization could be carried out by choosing SA values maintaining the scatter around the vertex. Unfortunately, the distribution shape is slightly influenced by heat losses: This effect must be taken into account in order to avoid overadvanced calibrations. SA is then controlled by means of a proportional-integer-derivative controller, fed by an error that is defined based on previous considerations: A contribution is related to the MFB50-IMEP distribution, and a second contribution is related to the net cumulative heat release-IMEP distribution. The latter is able to take into account for heat losses. First, the methodology has been tested on in-cylinder pressure data, collected from different SI engines; then, it has been implemented in real-time by means of a programmable combustion analyzer: The system performs a cycle-to-cycle combustion analysis, evaluating the combustion parameters necessary to calculate the target SA, which is then actuated by the ECU. The approach proved to be efficient, reducing the number of engine cycles necessary for the calibration to less than 1000 per operating condition.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2011
Research Papers
Spark Advance Real-Time Optimization Based on Combustion Analysis
Enrico Corti,
Enrico Corti
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace Nuclear Engineering and Metallurgy (DIEM),
University of Bologna
, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Claudio Forte
Claudio Forte
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace Nuclear Engineering and Metallurgy (DIEM),
University of Bologna
, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Enrico Corti
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace Nuclear Engineering and Metallurgy (DIEM),
University of Bologna
, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy
Claudio Forte
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace Nuclear Engineering and Metallurgy (DIEM),
University of Bologna
, Viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, ItalyJ. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Sep 2011, 133(9): 092804 (8 pages)
Published Online: April 15, 2011
Article history
Revised:
October 11, 2010
Received:
October 11, 2010
Online:
April 15, 2011
Published:
April 15, 2011
Citation
Corti, E., and Forte, C. (April 15, 2011). "Spark Advance Real-Time Optimization Based on Combustion Analysis." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. September 2011; 133(9): 092804. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002919
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
An Efficient Uncertainty Quantification Method Based on Inter-Blade Decoupling for Compressors
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Experimental Design Validation of A Swirl-Stabilized Burner with Fluidically Variable Swirl Number
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Experimental Characterization of A Bladeless Air Compressor
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
Cycle-to-Cycle Feedback for Combustion Control of Spark Advance at the Misfire Limit
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (October,2018)
A Statistical Approach to Spark Advance Mapping
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (August,2010)
A Comparison Between Combustion Phase Indicators for Optimal Spark Timing
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (September,2008)
Physics Based Control Oriented Model for HCCI Combustion Timing
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March,2010)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
4-Bit Pipeline ADC for Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE 2009)
Engine Gas Exchange Controlled by Digital Hydraulics
International Conference on Measurement and Control Engineering 2nd (ICMCE 2011)
Physiology of Human Power Generation
Design of Human Powered Vehicles