Naturally occurring limestone and samples from a lab-scale dual fluidized bed (DFB) calcium looping test facility were analyzed in a thermogravimetric analyzer. The reactivity of the samples evaluated at typical carbonation conditions prevailed in the carbonator was compared with raw samples. The rate of carbonation and carbonation capacity of the samples were compared with respect to the following three categories: number of calcination-carbonation cycles, carbonation temperature, and concentration. It is suspected that the much lower activity of the DFB sample is attributed to the differences in experimental conditions, i.e., partial carbonation of the DFB particles, fast heating rate in the calciner and thus a rapid calcination reaction, and particle attrition in the circulating fluidized bed calciner riser. These harsh conditions lead to sintering and thus a loss of surface area and reactivity. Sintered DFB samples showed low (nearly one-third of the raw samples) but stable conversions with increasing number of cycles. Hydration was used as an attempt to regenerate the lost capture capacity of partially carbonated and sintered DFB sample. Hydration of the DFB sample was successful in increasing the maximum capture capacity in the fast reaction regime to values almost as high as that of a fresh sample in its first carbonation cycle. Although more investigation is required to investigate the effect of hydration on the CaO particle morphology, a process modification to enhance the capture efficiency of the carbonator via particle hydration was proposed.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: sivalingam@es.mw.tum.de
Article navigation
July 2011
Research Papers
Analysis and Comparison of Reactivity and Capture Capacity of Fresh Calcium-Based Sorbents and Samples From a Lab-Scale Dual Fluidized Bed Calcium Looping Facility
Senthoorselvan Sivalingam,
Senthoorselvan Sivalingam
Lehrstuhl Energiesysteme,
e-mail: sivalingam@es.mw.tum.de
Technische Universität München (TUM)
, Boltzsmannstrasse 15, 85748 Garching, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephan Gleis,
Stephan Gleis
Lehrstuhl Energiesysteme,
Technische Universität München (TUM)
, Boltzsmannstrasse 15, 85748 Garching, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Hartmut Spliethoff,
Hartmut Spliethoff
Lehrstuhl Energiesysteme,
Technische Universität München (TUM)
, Boltzsmannstrasse 15, 85748 Garching, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Craig Hawthorne,
Craig Hawthorne
Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology (IFK),
University of Stuttgart
, Pfaffenwaldring 23, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Alexander Charitos,
Alexander Charitos
Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology (IFK),
University of Stuttgart
, Pfaffenwaldring 23, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Guenter Scheffknecht
Guenter Scheffknecht
Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology (IFK),
University of Stuttgart
, Pfaffenwaldring 23, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Senthoorselvan Sivalingam
Lehrstuhl Energiesysteme,
Technische Universität München (TUM)
, Boltzsmannstrasse 15, 85748 Garching, Germanye-mail: sivalingam@es.mw.tum.de
Stephan Gleis
Lehrstuhl Energiesysteme,
Technische Universität München (TUM)
, Boltzsmannstrasse 15, 85748 Garching, Germany
Hartmut Spliethoff
Lehrstuhl Energiesysteme,
Technische Universität München (TUM)
, Boltzsmannstrasse 15, 85748 Garching, Germany
Craig Hawthorne
Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology (IFK),
University of Stuttgart
, Pfaffenwaldring 23, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Alexander Charitos
Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology (IFK),
University of Stuttgart
, Pfaffenwaldring 23, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Guenter Scheffknecht
Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology (IFK),
University of Stuttgart
, Pfaffenwaldring 23, D-70569 Stuttgart, GermanyJ. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Jul 2011, 133(7): 071705 (6 pages)
Published Online: March 21, 2011
Article history
Received:
May 16, 2010
Revised:
May 25, 2010
Online:
March 21, 2011
Published:
March 21, 2011
Citation
Sivalingam, S., Gleis, S., Spliethoff, H., Hawthorne, C., Charitos, A., and Scheffknecht, G. (March 21, 2011). "Analysis and Comparison of Reactivity and Capture Capacity of Fresh Calcium-Based Sorbents and Samples From a Lab-Scale Dual Fluidized Bed Calcium Looping Facility." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. July 2011; 133(7): 071705. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002683
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Temperature Dependence of Aerated Turbine Lubricating Oil Degradation from a Lab-Scale Test Rig
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Multi-Disciplinary Surrogate-Based Optimization of a Compressor Rotor Blade Considering Ice Impact
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Experimental Investigations on Carbon Segmented Seals With Smooth and Pocketed Pads
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
Cyclic Carbonation Calcination Studies of Limestone and Dolomite for CO 2 Separation From Combustion Flue Gases
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2009)
Removal of Gaseous Alkali Metal Compounds from Hot Flue Gas by Particulate Sorbents
J. Eng. Power (April,1980)
Hydration of Partially Sulfated Lime Particles From Fluidized Bed Combustors
J. Energy Resour. Technol (June,2001)
Application of MCFC in Coal Gasification Plants for High Efficiency CO 2 Capture
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2012)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Gas-Fluidized Beds
Two-Phase Heat Transfer
Three-Dimensional Modelling on the Hydrodynamics of a Circulating Fluidised Bed
Inaugural US-EU-China Thermophysics Conference-Renewable Energy 2009 (UECTC 2009 Proceedings)
Threshold Functions
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines: Operating Experience and Future Potential