Procurement of process plant equipment involves decisions based not only on an economic agenda but also on long term plant capability, which in turn depends on equipment reliability. As the greater global community raises environmental concerns and pushes for economic reform, a tool is evermore required for a specific and critical selection of plant equipment. Risk assessments based on NASA’s Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale have been employed in many previous risk models to map technology in terms of risk and reliability. The authors envisage a scale for quantifying the technical risk. The focus of this paper is the technical risk assessment of gas turbines as mechanical drivers for producing liquefied natural gas (LNG). This risk assessment is a cornerstone of the technoeconomic environmental and risk analysis (TERA) philosophy developed by Cranfield University’s Department of Power and Propulsion in U.K. Monte Carlo simulations are used in order to compare the risks of introducing new plant equipment against existing and established plant equipment. Three scenarios are investigated using an 87MW single spool, typical industrial machine, a baseline engine followed by an engine with increased firing temperature, and finally an engine with a zero staged compressor. The results suggest that if the baseline engine was to be upgraded, then the zero staging option would be a better solution than increasing the firing temperature since zero staging gives the lower rise in total time to repair (TTTR) or downtime. The authors suggest a scaling system based on NASA’s TRL but with modified definition criteria for the separate technology readiness levels in order to better relate the scale to gas turbine technology. The intention is to link the modified TRL to downtime, since downtime has been identified as a quantitative measure of technical risk. Latest developments of the modeling are looking at integrating risk analysis and a maintenance cost and scheduling model to provide a platform for total risk assessment. This, coupled with emissions modeling, is set to provide the overall TERA tool for LNG technology selection.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: r.s.r.khan.cranfield.ac.uk
e-mail: m.c.lagana@cranfield.ac.uk
e-mail: s.ogaji@cranfield.ac.uk
e-mail: p.pilidis.cranfield.ac.uk
Article navigation
July 2011
Research Papers
Risk Analysis of Gas Turbines for Natural Gas Liquefaction
Raja S. R. Khan,
Raja S. R. Khan
Doctoral Researcher
Department of Power and Propulsion,
e-mail: r.s.r.khan.cranfield.ac.uk
Cranfield University
, Bedforshire MK43 0AL, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Maria C. Lagana,
Maria C. Lagana
Department of Power and Propulsion,
e-mail: m.c.lagana@cranfield.ac.uk
Cranfield University
, Bedforshire MK43 0AL, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Stephen O. T. Ogaji,
Stephen O. T. Ogaji
Senior Lecturer
Department of Power and Propulsion,
e-mail: s.ogaji@cranfield.ac.uk
Cranfield University
, Bedforshire MK43 0AL, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Pericles Pilidis,
Pericles Pilidis
Head of Department
Department of Power and Propulsion,
e-mail: p.pilidis.cranfield.ac.uk
Cranfield University
, Bedforshire MK43 0AL, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Ian Bennett
Ian Bennett
Team Lead Technology - Rotating Equipment,
Shell Global Solutions International, B.V.
, The Hague, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Raja S. R. Khan
Doctoral Researcher
Department of Power and Propulsion,
Cranfield University
, Bedforshire MK43 0AL, UKe-mail: r.s.r.khan.cranfield.ac.uk
Maria C. Lagana
Department of Power and Propulsion,
Cranfield University
, Bedforshire MK43 0AL, UKe-mail: m.c.lagana@cranfield.ac.uk
Stephen O. T. Ogaji
Senior Lecturer
Department of Power and Propulsion,
Cranfield University
, Bedforshire MK43 0AL, UKe-mail: s.ogaji@cranfield.ac.uk
Pericles Pilidis
Head of Department
Department of Power and Propulsion,
Cranfield University
, Bedforshire MK43 0AL, UKe-mail: p.pilidis.cranfield.ac.uk
Ian Bennett
Team Lead Technology - Rotating Equipment,
Shell Global Solutions International, B.V.
, The Hague, The NetherlandsJ. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Jul 2011, 133(7): 071704 (8 pages)
Published Online: March 21, 2011
Article history
Received:
May 10, 2010
Revised:
May 17, 2010
Online:
March 21, 2011
Published:
March 21, 2011
Citation
Khan, R. S. R., Lagana, M. C., Ogaji, S. O. T., Pilidis, P., and Bennett, I. (March 21, 2011). "Risk Analysis of Gas Turbines for Natural Gas Liquefaction." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. July 2011; 133(7): 071704. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002673
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Research on Effect of Endwall Contouring of Vaned Diffuser on Stable Operating Range of Centrifugal Compressor
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (March 2025)
Data-Driven Generative Model Aimed to Create Synthetic Data for the Long-Term Forecast of Gas Turbine Operation
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (March 2025)
Optimization of Smooth Straight-Through Labyrinth Seal Based on XGBoost and Improved Genetic Algorithm
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (March 2025)
Related Articles
Infrastructure Decay Modeling With the Input-Output Inoperability Model
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (March,2015)
Risk Assessment in Bridge Construction Projects Using Fault Tree and Event Tree Analysis Methods Based on Fuzzy Logic
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (September,2015)
Risk Assessment Methodology for Electric-Current Induced Drowning Accidents
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (September,2016)
Risk Analysis of Running a Deep-Water Production Test From a Dynamically Positioned Vessel in the North Atlantic
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (February,2005)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
QRAS Approach to Phased Mission Analysis (PSAM-0444)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
SAPHIRE — Past, Present and Future (PSAM-0279)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Identification and Analysis of Risk
Managing Risks in Design & Construction Projects