In this paper, reconstructed local fission rates obtained with the two-group nodal diffusion program PRESTO-2, used at the Leibstadt Nuclear Power Plant (KKL) in Switzerland, are compared with experimental results and MCNPX calculations. The experimental facility consists of a test zone, where the measurements are made, surrounded by a buffer zone and two driver zones that render the system critical and also contain the control rods. The test zone consists of a tank that contains a 3×3 array of BWR fuel assemblies of type SVEA-96+. Four cases are considered, all corresponding to a 1.23 m high active zone moderated with light water at room temperature: (1) axially uniform enrichment and gadolinium content, (2) like case 1 but with an L-shaped control blade completely inserted, (3) enrichment and gadolinium content change at the core midplane, and (4) like case 2 but with the control blade partially inserted. The comparisons give insight into the accuracy of the pin-power reconstruction methodology. The axially uniform case without control blade shows a good radial agreement and a well predicted axial curvature of the flux. On the other hand, systematic deviations are observed in the radial direction for the controlled cases, with the axial heterogeneities causing deviations around the discontinuity and also in the axial curvature of the flux.

1.
Giust
,
F.
,
Greiner
,
D.
, and
Vidal
,
C.
, 2004, “
BWR Core Monitoring Without LPRM Adaptation
,”
Fourth American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Controls and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC & HMIT 2004)
, Columbus, OH.
2.
Børresen
,
S.
,
Lindahl
,
S. Ö.
,
Patiño
,
N.
, and
Oña
,
C.
, 2006, PRESTO-2 Methods (Version 1.13), Studsvik-Scandpower.
3.
Stamm’ler
,
R. J. J.
,
Ferri
,
A.
,
Villarino
,
E.
, and
Casal
,
J.
, 2005, HELIOS Methods (Version 1.9), Studsvik-Scandpower.
4.
Ziver
,
A.
,
Brogli
,
R.
,
Chawla
,
R.
,
Grimm
,
P.
,
Hager
,
H.
,
Seiler
,
R.
, and
Williams
,
T.
, 1997, “
Planning Calculations for New LWR-Experiments at the PROTEUS Facility
,”
Proceedings of the Annual Meeting on Nuclear Technology ‘97
, Aachen, pp.
19
22
.
5.
Williams
,
T.
,
Chawla
,
R.
,
Grimm
,
P.
,
Joneja
,
O. P.
,
Seiler
,
R.
, and
Ziver
,
A.
, 1998, “
New Experiments at a Zero-Power Facility Using Power Reactor Fuel
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physics of Nuclear Science and Technology
, Long Island, pp.
720
727
.
6.
Williams
,
T.
, 1998, “
Experimental Test Matrix for the BWR Phase (EGL/ABB) of the LWR-PROTEUS Experiments
,” Paul Scherrer Institut Report No. AN-41-98-04.
7.
Jatuff
,
F.
,
Grimm
,
P.
,
Joneja
,
O. P.
,
Murphy
,
M.
,
Lüthi
,
A.
,
Seiler
,
R.
,
Brogli
,
R.
,
Jacot-Guillarmod
,
R.
,
Williams
,
T.
,
Helmersson
,
S.
, and
Chawla
,
R.
, 2001, “
LWR-PROTEUS Verification of Reaction Rate Distributions in Modern 10×10 BWR Fuel
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
0029-5639,
139
, pp.
262
272
.
8.
Jatuff
,
F.
,
Grimm
,
P.
,
van Geemert
,
R.
,
Murphy
,
M.
,
Seiler
,
R.
,
Brogli
,
R.
,
Giust
,
F.
,
Jacot-Guillarmod
,
R.
,
Williams
,
T.
,
Helmersson
,
S.
, and
Chawla
,
R.
, 2003, “
Validation of Axial Pin Power Distributions in a 10×10 BWR Assembly Across an Enrichment Boundary Under Full-Density Water Moderation Conditions
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
0306-4549,
30
, pp.
911
930
.
9.
2005, MCNPX User’s Manual, Version 2.5.0,
D.
Pelowitz
, ed.
10.
Murphy
,
M.
,
Lüthi
,
A.
,
Seiler
,
R.
,
Grimm
,
P.
,
Joneja
,
O. P.
,
Meister
,
A.
,
van Geemert
,
R.
,
Jatuff
,
F.
,
Brogli
,
R.
,
Jacot-Guillarmod
,
R.
,
Williams
,
T.
,
Helmersson
,
S.
, and
Chawla
,
R.
, 2002, “
Neutronics Investigations for the Lower Part of a Westinghouse SVEA-96+ Assembly
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
0029-5639,
141
, pp.
32
45
.
11.
Perret
,
G.
,
Murphy
,
M.
,
Jatuff
,
F.
,
Sublet
,
J. -Ch.
,
Bouland
,
O.
, and
Chawla
,
R.
, 2009, “
Impact of New Gadolinium Cross Sections on Reaction Rate Distributions in 10×10 BWR Assemblies
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
0029-5639,
163
, pp.
17
25
.
12.
Tohjoh
,
M.
,
Watanabe
,
M.
, and
Yamamoto
,
A.
, 2006, “
Three-Dimensional Pin Power Reconstruction for the Axially Heterogeneous Region in BWR
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
0306-4549,
33
, pp.
242
251
.
You do not currently have access to this content.