In the volatile fuel price environment of today, the quest for alternative fuels has become a heavy and long term trend in power generation worldwide. Incorporating alternative fuels in gas turbine installations raises multiple engineering questions relating to combustion, emissions, on-base and auxiliary hardware capability, safety, etc. In 2008, GE carried out a field test aimed at characterizing the combustion of ethanol in a naphtha fuelled gas turbine plant. The testing strategy has been to locally prepare and burn ethanol-naphtha blends with a fraction of ethanol increasing from 0% to nearly 100%. During the engineering phase prior to this field test, it appeared necessary to develop a sufficient knowledge on the behavior of ethanol-hydrocarbon blends in order to establish the safety analysis and address in particular the risks of (i) potential uncontrolled ignition event in the air blanket of fuel tanks and (ii) flash vaporization of potential fuel pond in a confined environment. Although some results exist in the car engine literature for ethanol-gasoline blends, it was necessary to take into account the specificities of gas turbine applications, namely, (i) the much greater potential ethanol concentration range (from 0% to 100%) and (ii) the vast composition spectrum of naphtha likely to generate a much larger Reid vapor pressure envelope as compared with automotive applications. In order to fulfill the safety needs of this field test, the “Laboratoire de Thermodynamique des Milieux Polyphasés” of Nancy, France has developed a thermodynamic model to approach the vaporization equilibria of ethanol-hydrocarbons mixtures with variable ethanol strength and naphtha composition. This model, named PPR78, is based on the 1978 Peng–Robinson equation of state and allows the estimation of the thermodynamic properties of a multicomponent mixture made of ethanol and naphtha compounds by using the group contribution concept. The saturation equilibrium partial pressure of such fluids in the various situations of relevance for the safety analysis can thus be calculated. The paper reports the elaboration of this model and illustrates the results obtained when using it in different safety configurations.

1.
Molière
,
M.
,
Vierling
,
M.
, and
Aboujaib
,
M.
, 2009, “
Gas Turbines in Alternative Fuel Application: Bio-Ethanol Field Test
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-59047.
2.
Robinson
,
D. B.
, and
Peng
,
D. Y.
, 1978, “
Characterization of the Heptanes and Heavier Fractions for the GPA Peng-Robinson Programs
,” Research Report RR-28 of the Gas Processors Association, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
3.
Jaubert
,
J. N.
, and
Mutelet
,
F.
, 2004, “
VLE Predictions With the Peng-Robinson Equation of State and Temperature Dependent kij Calculated Through a Group Contribution Method
,”
Fluid Phase Equilib.
0378-3812,
224
(
2
), pp.
285
304
.
4.
Jaubert
,
J. N.
,
Vitu
,
S.
,
Mutelet
,
F.
, and
Corriou
,
J. P.
, 2005, “
Extension of the PPR78 Model (Predictive 1978, Peng Robinson EOS With Temperature Dependent kij Calculated Through a Group Contribution Method) to Systems Containing Aromatic Compounds
,”
Fluid Phase Equilib.
0378-3812,
237
(
1–2
), pp.
193
211
.
5.
Vitu
,
S.
,
Jaubert
,
J. N.
, and
Mutelet
,
F.
, 2006, “
Extension of the PPR78 Model (Predictive 1978, Peng Robinson EOS With Temperature Dependent kij Calculated Through a Group Contribution Method) to Systems Containing Naphtenic Compounds
,”
Fluid Phase Equilib.
0378-3812,
243
, pp.
9
28
.
6.
Mutelet
,
F.
,
Vitu
,
S.
,
Privat
,
R.
, and
Jaubert
,
J. N.
, 2005, “
Solubility of CO2 in Branched Alkanes in Order to Extend the PPR78 Model (Predictive 1978, Peng Robinson EOS With Temperature Dependent kij Calculated Through a Group Contribution Method) to Such Systems
,”
Fluid Phase Equilib.
0378-3812,
238
(
2
), pp.
157
168
.
7.
Vitu
,
S.
,
Privat
,
R.
,
Jaubert
,
J. N.
, and
Mutelet
,
F.
, 2008, “
Predicting the Phase Equilibria of CO2+Hydrocarbon Systems With the PPR78 Model (PR EOS and kij Calculated Through a Group Contribution Method)
,”
J. Supercrit. Fluids
0896-8446,
45
(
1
), pp.
1
26
.
8.
Privat
,
R.
,
Jaubert
,
J. N.
, and
Mutelet
,
F.
, 2008, “
Addition of the Nitrogen Group to the PPR78 Model (Predictive 1978, Peng Robinson EOS With Temperature Dependent kij Calculated Through a Group Contribution Method)
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
0888-5885,
47
(
6
), pp.
2033
2048
.
9.
Privat
,
R.
,
Jaubert
,
J. N.
, and
Mutelet
,
F.
, 2008, “
Addition of the Sulfhydryl Group (-SH) to the PPR78 Model (Predictive 1978, Peng–Robinson EOS With Temperature Dependent kij Calculated Through a Group Contribution Method)
,”
J. Chem. Thermodyn.
0021-9614,
40
(
9
), pp.
1331
1341
.
10.
Privat
,
R.
,
Jaubert
,
J. N.
, and
Mutelet
,
F.
, 2008, “
Use of the PPR78 Model to Predict New Equilibrium Data of Binary Systems Involving Hydrocarbons and Nitrogen. Comparison With Other GCEOS
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
0888-5885,
47
(
19
), pp.
7483
7489
.
11.
Privat
,
R.
,
Mutelet
,
F.
, and
Jaubert
,
J. N.
, 2008, “
Addition of the Hydrogen Sulfide Group to the PPR78 Model (Predictive 1978, Peng Robinson EOS With Temperature Dependent kij Calculated Through a Group Contribution Method)
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
0888-5885,
47
(
24
), pp.
10041
10052
.
12.
Jaubert
,
J. N.
,
Coniglio
,
L.
, and
Denet
,
F.
, 1999, “
From the Correlation of Binary Systems Involving Supercritical CO2 and Fatty Acid Esters to the Prediction of (CO2-Fish Oils) Phase Behavior
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
0888-5885,
38
(
8
), pp.
3162
3171
.
13.
Jaubert
,
J. N.
, and
Coniglio
,
L.
, 1999, “
The Group Contribution Concept: A Useful Tool to Correlate Binary Systems and to Predict the Phase Behavior of Multicomponent Systems Involving Supercritical CO2 and Fatty Acids
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
0888-5885,
38
(
12
), pp.
5011
5018
.
14.
Jaubert
,
J. N.
,
Borg
,
P.
,
Coniglio
,
L.
, and
Barth
,
D.
, 2001, “
Phase Equilibria Measurements and Modeling of EPA and DHA Ethyl Esters in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide
,”
J. Supercrit. Fluids
0896-8446,
20
(
2
), pp.
145
155
.
15.
Poling
,
B. E.
,
Prausnitz
,
J. M.
, and
O’Connell
,
J. P.
, 2000,
The Properties of Gases and Liquids
,
Mc Graw-Hill
,
New York
.
16.
Privat
,
R.
,
Garcia
,
F.
,
Jaubert
,
J. N.
, and
Molière
,
M.
, 2009, “
Ethanol-Hydrocarbon Blend Vapor Prediction
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-59336.
17.
Byrd
,
R.
,
Lu
,
P.
,
Nocedal
,
J.
, and
Zhu
,
C.
, 1995, “
A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization
,”
SIAM J. Sci. Comput. (USA)
1064-8275,
16
(
5
), pp.
1190
1208
.
You do not currently have access to this content.