As carbon capture and storage technology has grown as a promising option to significantly reduce CO2 emissions, system integration and optimization claim an important and crucial role. This paper presents a comparative study of a gas turbine cycle with postcombustion CO2 separation using an amine-based absorption process with monoethanolamine. The study has been made for a triple pressure reheated 400 MWe natural gas-fuelled combined cycle with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) to improve capture efficiency. Two different options for the energy supply to the solvent regeneration have been evaluated and compared concerning plant performance. In the first alternative heat is provided by steam extracted internally from the bottoming steam cycle, while in the second option an external biomass-fuelled boiler was utilized to generate the required heat. With this novel configuration the amount of CO2 captured can be even more than 100% if the exhaust gas from the biofuelled boiler is mixed and cleaned together with the main exhaust gas flow from the combined cycle. In order to make an unprejudiced comparison between the two alternatives, the reduced steam turbine efficiency has been taken into consideration and estimated, for the alternative with internal steam extraction. The cycles have been modeled in the commercial heat and mass balance program IPSEPRO using detailed component models. Utilizing EGR can double the CO2 content of the exhaust gases and reduce the energy need for the separation process by approximately 2% points. Using an external biomass-fuelled boiler as heat source for amine regeneration turns out to be an interesting option due to high CO2 capture effectiveness. However the electrical efficiency of the power plant is reduced compared with the option with internal steam extraction. Another drawback with the external boiler is the higher investment costs but nevertheless, it is flexibility due to the independency from the rest of the power generation system represents a major operational advantage.

1.
2007, IEA World Energy Outlook.
2.
European Commission Directorate-General for Research
, 2006, “
World Energy Technology Outlook-2050
.”
3.
Reddy
,
S.
,
Scherffius
,
J.
,
Freguia
,
S.
, and
Roberts
,
C.
, 2003,“
Fluor’s Econamine FG PlusSM Technology: An Enhanced Amine-Based CO2 Capture Process
,”
Second National Conference on Carbon Sequestration
, Alexandria, VA, May 5–8.
4.
Alstom
, 2001, “
Engineering Feasibility and Economics of CO2 Capture on an Existing Coal-Fired Power Plant
,” US DOE NETL Report No. PPL-01-CT-09.
5.
Zachary
,
J.
, and
Titus
,
S.
, 2008, “
CO2 Capture and Sequestration Options: Impact on Turbo-Machinery Design
,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50642.
6.
Desideri
,
U.
, and
Paolucci
,
A.
, 1999, “
Performance Modelling of a Carbon Dioxide Removal System for Power Plants
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
0196-8904,
40
, pp.
1899
1915
.
7.
Singh
,
D.
,
Croiset
,
E.
,
Douglas
,
P. L.
, and
Douglas
,
M. A.
, 2003, “
Techno-Economic Study of CO2 Capture From an Existing Coal-Fired Power Plant: MEA Scrubbing Vs. O2/CO2 Recycle Combustion
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
0196-8904,
44
, pp.
3073
3091
.
8.
Kvamsdal
,
H. M.
,
Jordal
,
K.
, and
Bolland
,
O.
, 2007, “
A Quantitative Comparison of Gas Turbine Cycles With CO2 Capture
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
32
, pp.
10
24
.
9.
Fredriksson Möller
,
B.
,
Assadi
,
M.
,
Linder
,
U.
, 2003, “
CO2 Free Power Generation—A Study of Three Conceptually Different Plant Layouts
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38413.
10.
Tobiesen
,
A.
,
Svendsen
,
H. F.
, and
Hoff
,
K. A.
, 2005, “
Desorber Energy Consumption Amine-Based Absorption Plants
,”
International Journal of Green Energy
,
2
, pp.
201
215
.
11.
Abu-Zahra
,
M. R. M.
,
Schneiders
,
L. H. J.
,
Niederer
,
J. P. M.
,
Feron
,
P. H. M.
, and
Versteeg
,
G. F.
, 2007, “
CO2 Capture From Power Plants. Part I. A Parametric Study of the Technical Performance Based on Monoethalonamine
,”
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control
,
1
, pp.
37
46
. 1750-5836
12.
Aroonwilas
,
A.
, and
Veawab
,
A.
, 2007, “
Integration of CO2 Capture Unit Single- and Blended-Amines Into Supercritical Coal-Fired Power Plant: Implications for Emission and Energy Management
,”
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control
,
1
, pp.
143
150
. 1750-5836
13.
Romeo
,
L. M.
,
Espatoleroa
,
S.
, and
Bolea
,
I.
, 2008, “
Designing a Supercritical Steam Cycle to Integrate the Energy Requirements of CO2 Amine Scrubbing
,”
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control
,
2
, pp.
563
570
. 1750-5836
14.
Romeo
,
L. M.
,
Bolea
,
I.
, and
Escosa
,
J. M.
, 2008, “
Integration of Power Plant and Amine Scrubbing to Reduce CO2 Capture Costs
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
1359-4311,
28
(
8-9
), pp.
1039
1046
.
15.
Alie
,
C.
, 2006, “
Simulation and Optimization of a Coal-Fired Power Plant With Integrated CO2 Capture Using MEA Scrubbing
,”
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies
, Trondheim, Norway.
16.
Mimura
,
T.
,
Shimojo
,
S.
,
Suda
,
T.
,
Iijima
,
M.
, and
Mitsuoka
,
S.
, 1995, “
Research and Development on Energy Saving Technology for Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Recovery and Steam System in Power Plant
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
0196-8904,
36
, pp.
397
400
.
17.
Mimura
,
T.
,
Simayoshi
,
H.
,
Suda
,
T.
,
Iijima
,
M.
, and
Mituoka
,
S.
, 1997, “
Development of Energy Saving Technology for Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Recovery in Power Plant by Chemical Absorption Method and Steam System
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
0196-8904,
38
, pp.
S57
S62
.
18.
Alie
,
C.
, 2004, “
CO2 Capture With MEA: Integrating the Absorption Process and Steam Cycle of an Existing Coal-Fired Power Plant
,” M.Sc. thesis, University de Waterloo, Canada.
19.
Fredriksson Möller
,
B.
,
Obana
,
M.
,
Assadi
,
M.
, and
Mitakakis
,
A.
, 2004, “
Optimisation of HAT-Cycles-With and Without CO2 Capture
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53734.
20.
Chiesa
,
P.
, and
Consonni
,
S.
, 2000, “
Natural Gas-Fired Combined Cycles With Low CO2 Emissions
,”
Trans. ASME: J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
122
, pp.
429
436
.
21.
Finkenrath
,
M.
,
Ursin
,
T. P.
,
Hoffmann
,
S.
,
Bartlett
,
M.
,
Evulet
,
A.
,
Bowman
,
M. J.
,
Lynghjem
,
A.
, and
Jakobsen
,
J.
, 2007, “
Performance and Cost Analysis of Novel Gas Turbine Cycle With CO2 Capture
,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27764.
22.
Bolland
,
O.
, and
Mathieu
,
P.
, 1998, “
Comparison of Two CO2 Removal Options in Combined Cycle Power Plants
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
0196-8904,
39
(
16–18
), pp.
1653
1663
.
23.
ElKady
,
A. M.
,
Evulet
,
A.
,
Brand
,
A.
,
Ursin
,
T. P.
,
Lynghjem
,
A.
, 2008, “
Exhaust Gas Recirculation in DLN F-Class Gas Turbines for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture
,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-51152.
24.
Alstom Power webpage: http://www.power.alstom.com
25.
Kjellberg
,
T.
, “
Evaluation of a CO2 Capture Ready Combined Cycle
,” M.Sc. thesis, Lund University, Sweden. 2007.
26.
Kohl
,
A. L.
, and
Nielsen
,
R. B.
, 1997,
Gas Purification
,
5th ed.
,
Gulf Publishing Co.
,
Houston, TX
.
27.
Fredriksson Möller
,
B.
, 2005, “
A Thermoeconomic Evaluation of CO2 Capture With Focus on Gas Turbine-Based Power Plants
,” Ph.D. thesis, Lund University, Sweden.
28.
Schobeiri
,
M.
, 2005,
Turbomachinery Flow Physics and Dynamic Performance
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin, Heidelberg
.
29.
Simon
,
D.
, 2008, StandardKessel GmbH, Duisburg, Germany, personal communication.
30.
Chapel
,
D. G.
, and
Mariz
,
C. L.
, 1999, “
Recovery of CO2 From Flue Gases: Commercial Trends
,”
Canadian Society of Chemical Engineers Annual Meeting
, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, Oct. 4–6.
31.
European Commission
, IP/07/1537, 2007, “
Air Pollution: Commission Takes Action Over Levels of Sulphur Dioxide and PM10 in Member States
,” Brussels, Belgium, October.
32.
European Commission
, 2007, “
Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 Degrees Celsius: The Way Ahead for 2020 and Beyond
,” Brussels, Belgium, January.
33.
IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, 2005, “
Retrofit of CO2 Capture to Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plants
.”
You do not currently have access to this content.