The steam injected gas turbine (STIG), humid air turbine (HAT), and TOP Humid Air Turbine (TOPHAT) cycles lie at the center of the debate on which humid power cycle will deliver optimal performance when applied to an aeroderivative gas turbine and, indeed, when such cycles will be implemented. Of these humid cycles, it has been claimed that the TOPHAT cycle has the highest efficiency and specific work, followed closely by the HAT, and then the STIG cycle. In this study, the systems have been simulated using consistent thermodynamic and economic models for the components and working fluid properties, allowing a consistent and nonbiased appraisal of these systems. Part I of these two papers focuses purely on the thermodynamic performance and the impact of the system parameters on the performance; Part II will study the economic performance. The three humid power systems and up to ten system parameters are optimized using a multi-objective Tabu Search algorithm, developed in the Cambridge Engineering Design Centre.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: ronan.kavanagh@power.alstom.com
e-mail: gtp@eng.cam.ac.uk
Article navigation
July 2009
Research Papers
A Systematic Comparison and Multi-Objective Optimization of Humid Power Cycles—Part I: Thermodynamics
R. M. Kavanagh,
R. M. Kavanagh
Hopkinson Laboratory, Department of Engineering,
e-mail: ronan.kavanagh@power.alstom.com
Cambridge University
, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
G. T. Parks
G. T. Parks
Department of Engineering,
e-mail: gtp@eng.cam.ac.uk
Cambridge University
, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
R. M. Kavanagh
Hopkinson Laboratory, Department of Engineering,
Cambridge University
, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UKe-mail: ronan.kavanagh@power.alstom.com
G. T. Parks
Department of Engineering,
Cambridge University
, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UKe-mail: gtp@eng.cam.ac.uk
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Jul 2009, 131(4): 041701 (10 pages)
Published Online: April 13, 2009
Article history
Received:
April 7, 2008
Revised:
August 11, 2008
Published:
April 13, 2009
Citation
Kavanagh, R. M., and Parks, G. T. (April 13, 2009). "A Systematic Comparison and Multi-Objective Optimization of Humid Power Cycles—Part I: Thermodynamics." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. July 2009; 131(4): 041701. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3026561
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Temperature Dependence of Aerated Turbine Lubricating Oil Degradation from a Lab-Scale Test Rig
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Multi-Disciplinary Surrogate-Based Optimization of a Compressor Rotor Blade Considering Ice Impact
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Experimental Investigations on Carbon Segmented Seals With Smooth and Pocketed Pads
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
A Finite-Time Thermodynamic Framework for Optimizing Solar-Thermal Power Plants
J. Sol. Energy Eng (November,2007)
An Assessment of the Thermodynamic Performance of Mixed Gas–Steam Cycles: Part A—Intercooled and Steam-Injected Cycles
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,1995)
Generalized Thermodynamics of High-Temperature Combustion
Trans. ASME (August,1948)
The Recuperative Auto Thermal Reforming and Recuperative Reforming Gas Turbine Power Cycles With CO 2 Removal—Part II: The Recuperative Reforming Cycle
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2004)
Related Chapters
Two Decades of Optimism
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine
In Praise of Robert Stirling
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine
Pool Boiling
Thermal Management of Microelectronic Equipment, Second Edition