The increasing demand to reduce fuel burn, hence $CO2$ emissions, from the gas turbine requires efficient diffusion to reduce the system pressure loss in the combustor. However, interactions between prediffuser and combustor can have a significant effect on diffuser performance. For example, the consequence of increased fuel injector flow at a dump gap set using conventional design guidelines has been shown (Walker, A. D., Carrotte, J. F., and McGuirk, J. J., 2007. “Compressor∕Diffuser∕Combustor Aerodynamic Interactions in Lean Module Combustors,” ASME Turbo Expo 2007—Power for Land Sea and Air, Paper No. GT2007-27872) to introduce a destabilizing interaction between fuel injector and upstream components. The present paper concentrates on examining the effects of increased dump gap. Dump gap ratios of 0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 were employed, with each test utilizing the same inlet guide vane, compressor rotor, integrated outlet guide vane (OGV)∕prediffuser, and dump geometry. The flow fraction of compressor efflux entering the combustor cowl was set to be representative of lean combustors (50–70%). Measurements were made on a fully annular rig using a generic flame tube with metered cowl and inner∕outer annulus flows. The results demonstrate that, with fixed cowl flow, as the dump gap increases, component interactions decrease. At a dump gap ratio of 0.8, the proximity of the flame tube influences the prediffuser providing a beneficial blockage effect. However, if increased to 1.2, this beneficial effect is weakened and the prediffuser flow deteriorates. With further increase to 1.6, the prediffuser shows strong evidence of separation. Hence, at the dump gaps probably required for lean module injectors, it is unlikely the prediffuser will be influenced beneficially by the flame tube blockage; this must be taken into account in the design. Furthermore, with small dump gaps and high cowl flow fraction, the circumferential variation in cowl flow can feed upstream and cause OGV∕rotor forcing. At larger dump gaps, the circumferential variation does not penetrate upstream to the OGV, and the rotor is unaffected. The optimum dump gap and prediffuser design for best overall aerodynamic system performance from rotor through to feed annuli is a compromise between taking maximum advantage of upstream blockage effects and minimizing any 3D upstream forcing.

1.
Walker
,
A. D.
,
Carrotte
,
J. F.
, and
McGuirk
,
J. J.
, 2007, “
Enhanced External Aerodynamic Performance of a Generic Combustor Using an Integrated OGV∕Pre-Diffuser Design Technique
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
129
(
1
), pp.
80
87
.
2.
Walker
,
A. D.
,
Carrotte
,
J. F.
, and
McGuirk
,
J. J.
, 2007, “
Compressor∕Diffuser∕Combustor Aerodynamic Interactions in Lean Module Combustors
,” ASME Paper No. GT2007–27872.
3.
Hestermann
,
R.
,
Kim
,
S.
, and
Wittig
,
S.
, 1991, “
Geometrical Dependence of the Fluid Dynamic Parameters of Plane Combustor Model Diffusers
,”
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines
, Paper No. ISABE 91-7105, pp,
995
1001
.
4.
Fishenden
,
C. R.
, and
Stevens
,
S. J.
, 1977, “
Performance of Annular Combustor-Dump Diffusers
,”
J. Aircr.
0021-8669,
14
, pp.
60
67
.
5.
Carrotte
,
J. F.
, and
Barker
,
A. G.
, 1994, “
Annular Dump Diffuser Systems, Part II: The Combined Effects of Shortened Pre-Diffusers and Dump Gap Variation
,”
Loughborough University
, Internal Report No. TT94R07.
6.
Barker
,
A. G.
,
Carrotte
,
J. F.
,
Luff
,
J.
, and
McGuirk
,
J. J.
, 2003, “
D1.1 Design of an Integrated OGV∕Diffuser System
,”
Loughborough University
, Report No. TT03R01.
7.
Howard
,
J. H. G.
,
Henseler
,
H. J.
, and
Thornton-Trump
,
A. B.
, 1967, “
Performance and Flow Regimes for Annular Diffusers
,” ASME New York, 67-WA∕FE-2.
8.
Wray
,
A. P.
, and
Carrotte
,
J. F.
, 1993, “
The Development of a Large Annular Facility for Testing Gas Turbine Combustor Diffuser Systems
.” Paper No. AIAA-93-2546.
9.
Klein
,
A.
, 1995, “
Characteristics of Combustor Diffusers
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
0376-0421,
31
(
9
), pp.
171
271
.