A co-production system based on Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis reactor and gas turbine was simulated and analyzed. Syngas from entrained bed coal gasification was used as feedstock of the low-temperature slurry phase Fischer-Tropsch reactor. Raw synthetic liquid produced was fractioned and upgraded to diesel, gasoline, and liquid petrol gas (LPG). Tail gas composed of unconverted syngas and FT light components was fed to the gas turbine. Supplemental fuel (NG, or refinery mine gas) might be necessary, which was dependent on gas turbine capacity, expander through flow capacity, etc. FT yield information was important to the simulation of this co-production system. A correlation model based on Mobil’s two step pilot plant was applied. This model proposed triple chain-length-dependent chain growth factors and set up correlations among reaction temperatures with wax yield, methane yield, and C2C22 paraffin and olefin yields. Oxygenates in the hydrocarbon, water, and vapor phases were also correlated with methane yield. It was suitable for syngas, iron catalyst, and slurry bed. We can show the effect of temperature on the products’ selectivity and distribution. User models that can predict product yields and cooperate with other units were embedded into Aspen plus simulation. Performance prediction of syngas fired gas turbine was the other key of this system. The increase in mass flow through the turbine affects the match between compressor and turbine operating conditions. The calculation was carried out by GS software developed by Politecnico Di Milano and Princeton University. The simulated performance assumed that the expander operates under choked conditions and turbine inlet temperature equals the NG fired gas turbine. A “F” technology gas turbine was selected to generate power. Various cases were investigated to match the FT synthesis island, power island, and gasification island in co-production systems. Effects of CO2 removal/LPG recovery, co-firing, and CH4 content variation were studied. Simulation results indicated that more than 50% of input energy was converted to electricity and FT products. Total yield of gasoline, diesel, and LPG was 136155gNm3(CO+H2). At coal feed of 21.9kgs, net electricity exported to the grid was higher than 100MW. Total production of diesel and gasoline (and LPG) was 118,000t(134,000t)year. Under the economic analysis conditions assumed in this paper, the co-production system was economically feasible. The after tax profits can research 17 million euro. Payback times ranged from 6 to 7 years.

1.
Chevron
,
H.
, 1978, “
Process For Base Load And Peak Load Power Generation
,” Patent No. US4092825.
2.
APCI
, 1999, “
Gasification Combined Cycle Power Generation Process With Heat Integrated Chemical Production
,” Patent No. US5865023.
3.
Jahnke
,
F. C.
, 2003, “
Making Fischer-Tropsch Liquids And Power
,” Patent No. US20030083391A1.
4.
Sasol Technology Limited
, 2003, “
Combined Process For Producing Hydrocarbon And Power
,” Patent No. GB2377452.
5.
Sun
,
Q.
, 2006, “
One Way To Coproduct Power And Synthetic Oil From Syngas
,” Patent No. CN176119A.
6.
Bechtel Corporation, Global Energy Inc and Nexant Inc.
, 2003, “
Gasification Plant Cost And Performance Optimization
,” DOE Report No. DE-AC26-99FT40342: Task 2 Topical Report, Coke/Coal Gasification With Liquids Coproduction.
7.
Bechtel Corporation
, 1998, “
Aspen Process Flowsheet Simulation Model Of A Battelle Biomass-Based Gasification, Liquefaction and Combined-Cycle Power Plant
,” DOE Report No. DE-AC22-93PC91029.
8.
Michiel
,
J. A.
, and
Tijmense
,
A.
, 2002, “
Exploration Of The Possibilities For Production Of Fischer Tropsch Liquids And Power Via Biomass Gasification
,”
Biomass Bioenergy
0961-9534,
23
, pp.
129
152
.
9.
Larson
,
E. D.
, 1999, “
Biomass Conversion To Fischer-Tropsch Liquids: Preliminary Energy Balances
,”
Proceedings of 4th Biomass Conference of The Americas
, Aug. 29–Sept. 2, Oakland, CA.
10.
Steynberg
,
A. P.
, and
Nel
,
H.
, 2004, “
Clean Coal Conversion Options Using Fischer-Tropsch Technology
,”
Fuel
0016-2361,
83
, pp.
765
770
.
11.
Bechtel Corporation
, 1999, “
Baseline Design/Economics For Advanced Fischer-Tropsh Technology
,” DOE report No. De-Aczz-91pcgo027.
12.
Botha
,
M. S.
, and
Benham
,
C. B.
, 2003, “
Coal-To-Liquids Via Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis
,”
Proceedings 244 International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization and Fuel Systems
.
13.
Consonni
,
S.
,
Larson
,
E.
,
Katofsky
,
R.
, 2004, “
An Assessment of Black Liquor Gasification Combined Cycles Part A: Technological Issues and Performance Comparisons
,”
Proceedings of the 49th ASME International Gas Turbine & Aeroengine Technical Congress, Exposition and Users Symposium
, 14–17 June,
Vienna, Austria
.
14.
Consonni
,
S.
,
Larson
,
E.
,
Kreutz
,
T.
, and
Berglin
,
N.
, 1998, “
Black Liquor-Gasifier/Gas Turbine Cogeneration
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
120
(
3
), pp.
442
449
.
15.
Fox
,
J. M.
, III
, and
Tam
,
S. T.
, 1995, “
Correlation of Slurry Reactor Fischer Tropsch Yield Data
,”
Top. Catal.
1022-5528,
2
, pp.
295
300
.
16.
Kohl
,
A. I.
, 1997,
Gas Purification
,
Gulf Publishing Company
, Houston, TX.
17.
Summary Report(Coal Gasification Syngas), 2006, “
Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis Reactors
,” personal contact.
18.
Ma
,
W. P.
,
Ding
,
Y.
, 2001, “
A Review And A View Of Studies On The Kinetics Of Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis
,”
Natural Gas Chem.l Eng.
,
26
, pp.
42
46
.
19.
Lox
,
E. S.
,
et al.
, 1993, “
Kinetics of the Fischer-Tropsch Reaction on a Precipitated Promoted Iron Catalyst
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
0888-5885,
32
, pp.
71
82
.
20.
Summary Report(Black Liquor Syngas), 2006, “
Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis Reactors
,” personal contact.
You do not currently have access to this content.