A general conservative numerical model for the simulation of transmission-line unsteady fluid dynamics has been developed and applied to high-pressure injection systems. A comprehensive thermodynamic approach for modeling acoustic cavitation, i.e., cavitation induced by wave propagation, was proposed on the basis of a conservative homogeneous two-phase barotropic flow model of a pure liquid, its vapor, and a gas, both dissolved and undissolved. A physically consistent sound speed equation was set in a closed analytical form of wide application. For the pure-liquid flow simulation outside the cavitation regions, or in the absence of these, temperature variations due to compressibility effects were taken into account, for the first time in injection system simulation, through a thermodynamic relation derived from the energy equation. Nevertheless, in the cavitating regions, an isothermal flow was retained consistently with negligible macroscopic thermal effects due to vaporization or condensation, because of the tiny amounts of liquid involved. A novel implicit, conservative, one-step, symmetrical, and trapezoidal scheme of second-order accuracy was employed to solve the partial differential equations governing the pipe flow. It can also be enhanced at a high-resolution level. The numerical model was applied to wave propagation and cavitation simulation in a high-pressure injection system of the pump-line-nozzle type for light and medium duty vehicles. The system was relevant to model assessment because, at part loads, it presented cavitating flow conditions that can be considered as severe, at least for a diesel injection system. The predicted time histories of pressure at two pipe locations and of injector needle lift were compared to experimental results, substantiating the validity and robustness of the developed conservative model in simulating acoustic cavitation inception and desinence with great accuracy degree. Cavitation transients and the flow discontinuities induced by them were numerically predicted and analyzed.

1.
Baltzer
,
R. A.
, 1967, “
Column Separation Accompanying Liquid Transients in Pipes
,”
ASME J. Basic Eng.
0021-9223,
89
, pp.
837
846
.
2.
Chaudhry
,
M. H.
,
Bhallamudi
,
S. M.
,
Martin
,
C. S.
, and
Naghash
,
M.
, 1990, “
Analysis of Transient Pressures in Bubbly, Homogeneous, Gas-Liquid Mixtures
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
112
, pp.
225
231
.
3.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Dongiovanni
,
C.
, and
Mittica
,
A.
, 1992, “
Implicit Numerical Model of a High-Pressure Injection System
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
114
, pp.
534
543
.
4.
Shu
,
J.-J.
,
Edge
,
K. A.
,
Burrows
,
C. R.
, and
Xiao
,
S.
, 1993, “
Transmission Line with Vaporous Cavitation
,” ASME Paper No. 93-WA/FPST-2.
5.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Dongiovanni
,
C.
,
Mittica
,
A.
,
Spessa
,
E.
, and
Lovisolo
,
F.
, 1994, “
Study of Unsteady Flow Phenomena in an Automotive Diesel Injection System
,”
Proceedings of the XXV FISITA Congress
,
International Academic Publishers
, Beijing,
1
, pp.
124
137
.
6.
Hapke
,
I.
, and
Iben
,
H.
, 1998, “
Modellierung und Berechnung der Kavitation in Instationären Leitungsströmungen
,”
Motortech. Z.
0024-8525,
1
, pp.
60
64
.
7.
Nguyen-Schaefer
,
H.
, and
Sprafke
,
H.
, 1998, “
Numerical Study on Interaction Effects of Bubbles Induced by Air-Release and Cavitation in Hydraulic Systems
,”
10th Bath International Fluid Power Workshop
,
Research Studies Press
, Wiley, New York.
8.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Dongiovanni
,
C.
, and
Spessa
,
E.
, 2000, “
Delivery-Valve Effects on the Performance of an Automotive Diesel Fuel-Injection System
,”
SAE Trans.
0096-736X,
108
, pp.
1399
1415
.
9.
Beck
,
M.
,
Iben
,
U.
,
Mittwollen
,
N.
,
Iben
,
H.-K.
, and
Munz
,
C.-D.
, 2001, “
On Solution of Conservation Equations in Cavitated Hydraulic Pipelines
,”
3rd International Symposium on Computational Technologies for Fluid/Thermal/Chemical Systems with Industrial Applications
, July 22–26, Atlanta, GA.
10.
Iben
,
U.
,
Wrona
,
F.
,
Munz
,
C. D.
, and
Beck
,
M.
, 2002, “
Cavitation in Hydraulic Tools Based on Thermodynamic Properties of Liquid and Gas
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
124
, pp.
1011
1017
.
11.
Matsuoka
,
S.
,
Yokota
,
K.
,
Kamimoto
,
T.
, and
Igoshi
,
M.
, 1976, “
A Study of Fuel Injection Systems in Diesel Engines
,” SAE Paper No. 760551.
12.
Wallis
,
W.
, 1975, “
One Dimensional Two-Phase Flow
,”
McGraw Hill
, New York.
13.
Kolev
,
N. I.
, 1986, “
Transiente Zweiphasen Strömung
,”
Springer-Verlag
, Berlin.
14.
Iben
,
U.
, 2000, “
Cavitation Modeling
,”
Analysis, Modeling and Simulation
,
Gordon and Breach
, London.
15.
Date
,
K.
,
Manabe
,
M.
,
Kano
,
H.
,
Kato
,
M.
, and
Oya
,
T.
, 1992, “
Contribution of Fuel Flow Improvement in Nozzle to Spray Formation
,” SAE Paper No. 920622.
16.
Kalkwijk
,
J. P. T.
, and
Kranenburg
,
C.
, 1971, “
Cavitation in Horizontal Pipelines Due to Water Hammer
,”
ASCE Journal of Hydraulics Division
,
97
, pp.
1585
1605
.
17.
Streeter
,
V. L.
, 1969, “
Water Hammer Analysis
,”
ASCE Journal of Hydraulics Division
,
95
, pp.
1959
1972
.
18.
Kumar
,
K.
,
Gajendra Babu
,
M. K.
,
Gaur
,
R. R.
, and
Garg
,
R. D.
, 1983, “
A Finite Difference Scheme for the Simulation of a Fuel Injection System
,” SAE Paper No. 831337.
19.
Anderson
,
D.
,
Tannehill
,
J. C.
, and
Pletcher
,
R. H.
, 1984, “
Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer
,”
McGraw-Hill
, New York.
20.
Ferrari
,
A.
,
Manno
,
M.
, and
Mittica
,
A.
, 2004, “
Comparison Between Conservative and Nonconservative Models in the Simulation of High-Pressure Injection System Under Cavitating Conditions
,”
CD ROM Proceedings of 7th Biennal ASME Conference Engineering System Design and Analysis
, July 19–22, Manchester, UK.
21.
Ferrari
,
A.
, 2004, “
Development of a Model for Thermo-Fluid Dynamic Transient Simulation in High-Pressure Injection Systems. Equipment of a High-Performance Test Bench for Diesel Fuel Injection Systems: First Experimental Results on Common Rail System Dynamics
,” (in Italian), Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di Torino.
22.
Manno
,
M.
, 2004, “
Equipment of a High-Performance Test Bench for Diesel Fuel Injection-Systems: First Experimental Results on Common Rail System Dynamics. Development of Numerical Methods for High-Pressure Injection System Flow Transients
,” (in Italian), Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di Torino.
23.
Bejan
,
A.
, 1997, “
Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics
,”
Wiley
, New York.
24.
Atkins
,
P. W.
, “
Physical Chemistry
,” 1986,
Oxford University Press
, Oxford.
25.
Catania
,
A. E.
,
Ferrari
,
A.
,
Manno
,
M.
, and
Spessa
,
E.
, 2004, “
Thermal Effect Simulation in High-Pressure Injection System Transient Flows
,” SAE SP-1824 “Diesel Fuel Injection and Sprays,” pp.
44
59
, SAE Paper No. 2004-01-0532, SAE 2004 World Congress, Detroit, MI, March 8–12.
26.
Bosch
,
R.
, GmbH, 1999, “
Diesel-Engine Management
,”
Bosch Technical Books
, SAE international.
27.
Bosch
,
R.
, GmbH, private communication.
28.
Hirsch
,
C.
, 1988,
Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, Vol. 2—Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows
,
Wiley
, New York.
29.
LeVeque
,
R. J.
, 1990,
Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws
,
Birkhäuser-Verlag
, Berlin.
30.
Chaudhry
,
M. H.
, and
Hussaini
,
M. Y.
, 1985, “
Second-Order Accurate Explicit Finite-Difference Schemes for Waterhammer Analysis
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
107
, pp.
523
529
.
31.
Harten
,
A.
,
Engquist
,
B.
,
Osher
,
S.
, and
Chakravarthy
,
S. R.
, 1987, “
Uniformly High Order Accurate Essentially Non-Oscillatory Schemes, III
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
0021-9991,
71
, pp.
231
303
.
You do not currently have access to this content.