Buoyant and nonbuoyant shapes of methane flames issued from a 2:1 aspect ratio elliptic tube burner were measured. Nonbuoyant conditions were obtained in the KC-135 microgravity research aircraft operated by NASA’s Johnson Space Center. A mathematical model based on the extended Burke-Schumann flame theory is developed to predict the flame length of an elliptic burner. The model utilizes Roper’s theoretical method for circular burners and extends the analysis for elliptic burners. The predicted flame length using the theoretical model agrees well with experimental measurements. In general for the elliptic burner the nonbuoyant flames are longer than the buoyant flames. However, measured lengths of both buoyant and nonbuoyant flame lengths change proportionally with the volumetric fuel flow rate and support the L vs Q correlation. The maximum flame width measured at buoyant and nonbuoyant conditions also show a proportional relation with the volumetric fuel flow rate. Normalized buoyant and nonbuoyant flame lengths of the elliptic burner correlate (LdRe) with the jet exit Reynolds number and exhibit a higher slope compared to a circular burner. Normalized flame width data show a power correlation (wd=cFrn) with the jet exit Froude number.

1.
Kolluri
,
P.
,
Kamal
,
A.
, and
Gollahalli
,
S. R.
, 1996, “
Application of Elliptical Primary-Air Inlet Geometries in the Inshot Burners of Residential Gas Furnaces
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
0195-0738,
118
, pp.
58
64
.
2.
Gollahalli
,
S. R.
, 1998, “
Effect of Flame Lift-off on the Differences Between the Diffusion Flames from Circular and Elliptic Burners
,”
J. Energy Resour. Technol.
0195-0738,
120
, pp.
161
166
.
3.
Gollahalli
,
S. R.
,
Khanna
,
T.
, and
Prabhu
,
N.
, 1992, “
Diffusion Flames of Gas Jets Issued from Circular and Elliptic Nozzles
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
0010-2202,
86
, pp.
267
288
.
4.
Gollahalli
,
S. R.
, and
Subba
,
S.
, 1996, “
Partially Premixed Laminar Gas Flames from Triangular Burner
,” AIAA Paper No. 96-0285, 34th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV,
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
13
, pp.
226
232
.
5.
Ho
,
C.-M.
, and
Gutmark
,
E.
, 1987, “
Vortex Induction and Mass Entrainment in a Small-Aspect-Ratio Elliptical Jet
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
179
, pp.
383
405
.
6.
Akin
,
J. E.
, and
Bass
,
J.
, 2001, “
Asymmetric Turbulent Jet Flows
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
191
, pp.
515
524
.
7.
Gutmark
,
E.
, and
Ho
,
C.-M.
, 1983, “
Near-Field Pressure Fluctuations of an Elliptic Jet
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
23
, pp.
354
358
.
8.
Jost
,
W.
, 1946,
Explosion and Combustion Processes in Gases
,
McGraw-Hill
, New York, p.
212
.
9.
Lin
,
K.-C.
,
Faeth
,
G. M.
,
Sunderland
,
P. B.
,
Urban
,
D. L.
, and
Yuan
,
Z.-G.
, 1999, “
Shapes of Nonbuoyant Round Luminous Hydrocarbon∕Air Laminar Jet Diffusion Flames
,”
Combust. Flame
0010-2180,
116
, pp.
415
431
.
10.
Sunderland
,
P. B.
,
Mendelson
,
B. J.
,
Yuan
,
Z.-G.
, and
Urban
,
D. L.
, 1999, “
Shapes of Buoyant and Nonbuoyant Laminar Jet Diffusion Flames
,”
Combust. Flame
0010-2180,
116
, pp.
376
386
.
11.
Roper
,
F. G.
, 1977, “
The Prediction of Laminar Jet Diffusion Flame Sizes: Part I. Theoretical Model
,”
Combust. Flame
0010-2180,
29
, pp.
219
226
.
12.
Camacho
,
J.
, 2003, “
Theoretical Analysis and Measurements of Elliptic Jet Flames
,” M.S. thesis, Combustion and Propulsion Research Laboratory, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX.
13.
Roper
,
F. G.
, 1977, “
The Prediction of Laminar Jet Diffusion Flame Sizes: Part II. Experimental Verification
,”
Combust. Flame
0010-2180,
29
, pp.
227
234
.
You do not currently have access to this content.