A massive effort towards sustainability is necessary to prevent global warming and energy sources impoverishment: both biomass and waste to energy conversion may represent key actions to reach this goal. At the present, state of the art available technologies for biomass and waste to energy conversion are similar and include low to mid efficiency grate incineration or fluidized bed combustion with steam power cycles or mid to high efficiency gas turbine based cycles through integrated gasification technology. Nevertheless, these plants are all available from mid-to-high scale range that can be highly intrusive on protected areas and socially unacceptable. This paper proposes an innovative, low cost, high efficiency plant in which the residue is gasified in the absence of oxygen (pyrolysis), in a rotary kiln, by means of a highly regenerative gas turbine based cycle. Pyrolysis is preferred to gasification, because the syngas obtained has a higher low heating value and produces char or tar as a by-product with an interesting energy content to be re-utilized inside the cycle. Different plant configurations are proposed and discussed through principal thermodynamic variables parametric analysis. Results show that very interesting efficiencies are obtainable in the 30–40% range for every plant scale. This fact shows how IPRP technology can provide an interesting alternative to traditional technologies, especially for the small size (below 5MW). Moreover, the IPRP technology provides a unique solution for microscale (below 500 kW) power plants, opening a new and competitive possibility for distributed biomass or waste to energy conversion systems where low environmental and social impact turns into higher interest and positive dissemination effect.

1.
UN Convention on Climate Change, 1997, Report of the conference of the parties on its third session, held at Kyoto from 1 to 11 December, FCCC/CP/1997/7/Add. 1.
2.
van den Broek
,
R.
,
Faaij
,
A.
, and
van Wijk
,
A.
,
1996
, “
Biomass Combustion for Power Generation
,”
Biomass Bioenergy
,
11
, pp.
271
281
.
3.
Sta`hl
,
K.
, and
Neergaard
,
M.
,
1998
, “
IGCC Power Plant for Biomass Utilisation, Va¨rnamo, Sweden
,”
Biomass Bioenergy
,
15
, pp.
205
211
.
4.
Elmegaard, B., Henriksen, U., and Qvale, B., 2002, “Thermodynamic Analysis of Supplementary-Fired Gas Turbine Cycles,” Proceedings of the Conference “ECOS 2002”.
5.
Elmegaard, B., Qvale, B., Carapelli, G., and De Faveri, P., 2001, “Open-Cycle Indirectly Fired Gas Turbine for Wet Biomass Fuels,” Proceedings of the Conference “ECOS 2001,” July 4–6, Istanbul, Turkey.
6.
Solantausta
,
Y.
,
Bridgwater
,
A. V.
, and
Beckman
,
D.
,
1995
, “
Feasibility of Power Production With Pyrolysis and Gasification Systems
,”
Biomass Bioenergy
,
9
, pp.
257
269
.
7.
Bridgwater
,
A. V.
,
Elliot
,
D. C.
,
Fagernas
,
L.
,
Gifford
,
J. S.
,
Mackie
,
K. L.
, and
Toft
,
A. J.
,
1995
, “
The Nature and Control of Solid, Liquid and Gaseous Emissions From the Thermochemical Processing of Biomass
,”
Biomass Bioenergy
,
9
, pp.
325
341
.
8.
Demirbas
,
A.
,
2001
, “
Carbonisation Ranking of Selected Biomass for Charcoal, Liquid and Gaseous Products
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
42
, pp.
1229
1238
.
9.
Demirbas
,
A.
,
1997
, “
Calculation of Higher Heating Values of Biomass Fuels
,”
Fuel
,
76
, pp.
431
434
.
10.
Demirbas
,
A.
,
2000
, “
Mechanism of Liquefaction and Pyrolysis Reactions of Biomass
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
41
, pp.
633
646
.
11.
Di Blasi, C., and Branca, C., 2000, “Evaluation of the Performance of a Novel Straw Pyrolysis Reactor,” 1st World Conference on Biomass for Energy and Industry, Sevilla, Spain, 5–9 June, pp. 1767–1770.
12.
Di Blasi
,
C.
,
Signorelli
,
G.
,
Di Russo
,
C.
, and
Rea
,
G.
,
1999
, “
Product Distribution From Pyrolysis of Wood and Agricultural Residues
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
38
, pp.
2216
2224
.
13.
Di Blasi
,
C.
,
Signorelli
,
G.
, and
Portoricco
,
G.
,
1999
, “
Countercurrent Fixed-Bed Gasification of Biomass at Laboratori Scale
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
38
, pp.
2571
2581
.
14.
Roy, C., and Morin, D., 1998, “Efficient Electricity Production From Biomass Through IPCC Power Plants,” 4th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT4), Interlaken, Switzerland.
15.
Fantozzi
,
F.
,
D’Alessandro
,
B.
, and
Bidini
,
G.
,
2003
, “
IPRP—Integrated Pyrolysis Regenerated Plant—Gas Turbine and Externally Heated Rotary-Kiln Pyrolysis as a Biomass and Waste Energy Conversion System. Influence of Thermodynamic Parameters
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A: J. Power Energy
217
, pp.
519
527
.
16.
Fantozzi, F., Di Maria, F., and Desideri, U., 2001, “Micro-Turbine Fuelled by Pyrolysis Gas,” Thermodynamic Analysis, Proceedings of the POWERGEN Europe Congress and Exhibition, Helsinki.
17.
Fantozzi, F., Di Maria, F., and Desideri, U., 2002, “Integrated Micro-Turbine and Rotary Kiln Pyrolysis System as a Waste to Energy Solution for a Small Town in Central Italy—Cost Positioning and Global Warming Assessment,” ASME Paper GT-2002-30652.
18.
Li
,
A. M.
,
Li
,
X. D.
,
Ren
,
Y.
,
Chi
,
Y.
,
Yan
,
J. H.
, and
Cen
,
K. F.
,
1999
, “
Pyrolysis of Solid Waste in a Rotary Kiln: Influence of Final Pyrolysis Temperature on the Pyrolysis Products
,”
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
,
50
, pp.
149
162
.
19.
Yang
,
J.
, and
Roy
,
C.
,
1996
, “
A New Method for DTA Measurement of Enthalpy Change During the Pyrolysis of Rubbers
,”
Thermochim. Acta
,
288
, pp.
155
168
.
20.
Arcangioli, S., Gamberi, F., Milli, A., and Scapecchi, N., “Analysis of an Indirectly Biomass-Fired Gasturbine Engine Integrated With Pyrolysis for Supplementary Firing,” Biomass Gasification Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU) Internal Report.
21.
Neilson
,
C. E.
,
1998
, “
LM2500 Gas Turbine Modifications for Biomass Fuel Operation
,”
Biomass Bioenergy
,
15
, pp.
269
273
.
22.
Encinar
,
J. M.
,
Gonzalez
,
J. F.
, and
Gonzalez
,
J.
,
2000
, “
Fixed-Bed Pyrolysis of Cynara Cardunculus L. Product Yields and Compositions
,”
Fuel Process. Technol.
,
68
, pp.
209
222
.
23.
Frantozzi, F., and Desideri, U., 2004, “Micro Scale Rotary Kiln Slow-Pyrolysis for Syngas and Char Production from Biomass and Waste: Reactor and Test Bench Realization,” ASME Paper GT-2004-54186.
24.
Bidini, G., Moriconi, A., Rossi, D., and Fantozzi, F., 2004, “IPRP—Integrated Pyrolysis Regenerated Plant Rotary Kiln Pyrolyzer and Microturbine for Distributed Energy Conversion from Biomass—A 70 Kw Demonstration Unit in Central Italy,” Proceedings of the Second World Conference and Technology Exhibition on Biomass for Energy Industry and Clilmate Protection, May, Rome.
You do not currently have access to this content.