The AZEP “advanced zero emissions power plant” project addresses the development of a novel “zero emissions,” gas turbine-based, power generation process to reduce local and global CO2 emissions in the most cost-effective way. Process calculations indicate that the AZEP concept will result only in a loss of about 4% points in efficiency including the pressurization of CO2 to 100 bar, as compared to approximately 10% loss using conventional tail-end CO2 capture methods. Additionally, the concept allows the use of air-based gas turbine equipment and, thus, eliminates the need for expensive development of new turbomachinery. The key to achieving these targets is the development of an integrated MCM-reactor in which (a) O2 is separated from air by use of a mixed-conductive membrane (MCM), (b) combustion of natural gas occurs in an N2-free environment, and (c) the heat of combustion is transferred to the oxygen-depleted air by a high temperature heat exchanger. This MCM-reactor replaces the combustion chamber in a standard gas turbine power plant. The cost of removing CO2 from the combustion exhaust gas is significantly reduced, since this contains only CO2 and water vapor. The initial project phase is focused on the research and development of the major components of the MCM-reactor (air separation membrane, combustor, and high temperature heat exchanger), the combination of these components into an integrated reactor, and subsequent scale-up for future integration in a gas turbine. Within the AZEP process combustion is carried out in a nearly stoichiometric natural gas/O2 mixture heavily diluted in CO2 and water vapor. The influence of this high exhaust gas dilution on the stability of natural gas combustion has been investigated, using lean-premix combustion technologies. Experiments have been performed both at atmospheric and high pressures (up to 15 bar), simulating the conditions found in the AZEP process. Preliminary tests have been performed on MCM modules under simulated gas turbine conditions. Additionally, preliminary reactor designs, incorporating MCM, heat exchanger, and combustor, have been made, based on the results of initial component testing. Techno-economic process calculations have been performed indicating the advantages of the AZEP process as compared to other proposed CO2-free gas turbine processes.

1.
Linder, U., Eriksen, E. H., and A˚sen, K. I., 2000, “A Method for Operating a Combustion Plant and a Combustion Plant,” SE Patent Application 0002037.
2.
Bruun, T., Werswick, B., Gro¨nstad, L., Kristiansen, K., and Linder, U., 2000, “A Device and a Method for Operating Said Device,” NO Patent Application 20006690.
3.
A˚sen, K. I., and Julsrud, S., 1997, “Method for Performing Catalytic or Non-Catalytic Processes, Wherein Oxygen is One of the Reactants,” NO Patent Application 19972630.
4.
Bill, A., Span, R., Griffin, T., Kelsall, G., and Sundkvist, S. G., 2001, “Technology Options for Zero Emissions’ Gas Turbine Power Generation,” International Conference Power Generation and Sustainable Development, Lie`ge, Belgium, 8–9 October.
5.
Hellberg, A. et al., 1999, “Zero Emission Power Plant—Process Selection,” Internal Report ABB ALSTOM Power, RT T10 57/99, July.
6.
Bruun, T., Werswick, B., Gro¨nstad, L., and Kristiansen, K., 2001, “Method and Apparatus for Feeding and Output of Two Gases to a Monolithic Structure,” NO Patent Application 20015134.
7.
Reinke, M., Carroni, R., Winkler, D., and Griffin, T., 2002, “Experimental Investigation of Natural Gas Combustion in Oxygen/Exhaust Gas Mixtures for Zero Emissions Power Generation,” Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Technologies and Combustion for a Clean Environment, Porto, July 2001. (to appear in International Journal on Environmental Combustion Technologies, 2002).
8.
Kesselring, J. P., 1986, “Catalytic Combustion,” in Advanced Combustion Methods, edited by F. J. Weinberg, Academic, London, pp. 237–275.
9.
Trimm
,
D. L.
,
1985
, “
Catalytic Combustion (Review)
,”
Appl. Catal.
,
7
, pp.
249
282
.
10.
Pfefferle
,
L. D.
, and
Pfefferle
,
W. C.
,
1987
, “
Catalysis in Combustion
,”
Catal. Rev. - Sci. Eng.
,
29
(2&3), pp.
219
267
.
11.
Griffin
,
T.
, and
Scherer
,
V.
,
1995
, “
Katalytisch unterstu¨tzte Verbrennung in Gasturbinen: Potentiale und Grenzen
,”
VGB Kraftwerkstechnik
,
75
, Heft 5, pp.
421
426
.
12.
Appel, C., Mantzaras, I., Scharen, R., Bombach, R., and Inauen, A., 2001, “Catalytic Combustion of H2/Air Mixtures Over Platinum,” accepted Sixth International Conference on Technologies and Combustion for a Clean Environment, 9–12 July, Porto, Portugal.
13.
Hamrin, S., 2003, “Styrning av Gasturbin Med MCM-Reaktor,” SE Patent Application 0300131-0.
You do not currently have access to this content.