Testing of a gas turbine engine for aircraft propulsion applications may be conducted in the actual aircraft or in a ground-test environment. Ground test facilities simulate flight conditions by providing airflow at pressures and temperatures experienced during flight. Flight-testing of the full aircraft system provides the best means of obtaining the exact environment that the propulsion system must operate in but must deal with limitations in the amount and type of instrumentation that can be put on-board the aircraft. Due to this limitation, engine performance may not be fully characterized. On the other hand, ground-test simulation provides the ability to enhance the instrumentation set such that engine performance can be fully quantified. However, the current ground-test methodology only simulates the flight environment thus placing limitations on obtaining system performance in the real environment. Generally, a combination of ground and flight tests is necessary to quantify the propulsion system performance over the entire envelop of aircraft operation. To alleviate some of the dependence on flight-testing to obtain engine performance during maneuvers or transients that are not currently done during ground testing, a planned enhancement to ground-test facilities was investigated and reported in this paper that will allow certain categories of flight maneuvers to be conducted. Ground-test facility performance is simulated via a numerical model that duplicates the current facility capabilities and with proper modifications represents planned improvements that allow certain aircraft maneuvers. The vision presented in this paper includes using an aircraft simulator that uses pilot inputs to maneuver the aircraft engine. The aircraft simulator then drives the facility to provide the correct engine environmental conditions represented by the flight maneuver.

1.
“Aeropropulsion Systems Test Facility,” 1998, AEDC Fact Sheet, AEDC Public Web Page, http://www.arnold.af.mil/aedc/factsheets/astf/ASTF.html, April 1998.
2.
Montgomery, P. A., et al., 2002, “Evolution of a Turbine Engine Test Facility to Meet the Test Needs of Future Aircraft,” ASME International Gas Turbine Institute 2002 TurboExpo, Paper No. TBD, June 2002.
3.
Montgomery, P. A., et al., 2000, “A Real-Time Turbine Engine Facility Model and Simulation For Test Operations Modernization and Integration,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0576, presented at the ASME TurboExpo 2000 in Munich Germany, May 2000.
4.
McKeehen, P. D., 1995, “GENESIS Simulation of a Modified Vista/F-16,” AIAA Paper No. 95-3381, presented at Flight Simulation Technologies Conference, Baltimore MD, August 1995.
5.
McKeehen, P. D., 1999, “Hypervelocity Vehicle Modeling and Simulation Using GENESIS,” AIAA Paper No. 99-4326, presented at the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Portland, OR, August 1999.
6.
“AIRFOX FlightLab,” AMST Systemtechnik Web Page, http://www.amst.co.at/products/flitesim.htm
7.
Chappell
,
M. A.
, and
McLaughlin
,
P. W.
,
1993
, “
Approach to Modeling Continuous Turbine Engine Operation From Startup to Shutdown
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
9
, No.
3
, pp.
466
471
.
8.
Davis, M. W., Jr., Hale, A. A., and Beale, D., 2001, “An Argument for Enhancement of the Current Inlet Distortion Ground Test Practice for Aircraft Turbine Engines,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0507, presented at the IGTI TurboExpo in New Orleans, LA, June 2001.
9.
Davis, M. W., Jr., et al., 1999, “A Proposal for Integration of Wind Tunnel and Engine Test Programs for the Evaluation of Airframe-Propulsion Compatibility Using Numerical Simulations,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-345, June 1999.
10.
Hale
,
A. A.
, and
O’Brien
,
W. F.
,
1998
, “
A Three-Dimensional Turbine Engine Analysis Compressor Code (TEACC) for Steady-State Inlet Distortion
,”
J. Turbomach.
,
120
, pp.
422
430
.
You do not currently have access to this content.