This paper investigates energy savings and economic aspects related to the use of microturbine generators in commercial buildings either for cogeneration electricity+heat or for trigeneration (electricity, heat and cold). In all calculations, reference is made to a 25kWel-class commercial microturbine generator (MTG), tested by the authors. Various plant schemes are considered, based on one or several MTG sets. The possibility of generating heat and/or cold also by an electrically driven inverse-cycle air-to-water heat pump/chiller system is also considered. Calculations are based on the simulation code TRIGEN developed by the authors. The code provides detailed energy, economic and emission yearly balances. The plant operating mode is optimized in each time interval. The results indicate that, due to large load variations, (i) the optimum turbine nominal output is in the range of about 70% of the electric peak demand, (ii) energy savings are marginal, (iii) advantages related to splitting the overall capacity on more than one unit are marginal, and (iv) the addition of an absorption machine improves the plant economics.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
cogeneration, power generation economics, heat pumps, cooling, energy conservation, gas turbines
Topics:
Cooling, Heat, Optimization, Stress, Microturbines, Temperature, Heat pumps, Engines, Natural gas, Cycles, Combined heat and power, Heating
1.
Roncato, J. P., and Macchi, E., 2000, “Report of Study Group 7.2: Comparison of Medium or Large Scale CHP and Combined Cycles, in Various Countries,” Woc7 Report, Proceedings of World Gas Conference 2000, Nice, June IGUTCC, France, pp. 55–82.
2.
Kincaid, D. E., 1999, “Distributed Generation: A Primer,” Gas Research Institute, Diesel&Gas Turbine–Distributed power, BPA International, Oct.
3.
Green, S., 2001, “Distributed Generation—A New Wave,” Power Engineering International, PennWell, Mar.
4.
Campanari
,
S.
, and
Macchi
,
E.
, 2001, “Potential Developments in Gas-Fired Microturbines: Hybrid Cycles and Trigeneration,” Cogeneration and On-site Power Production, 2(2) (Mar.).
5.
De Biasi, V., 2001, “DOE Developing Technology Base for Advanced Microturbine Designs,” Gas Turbine World, Pequot, CT, 31, (4), July.
6.
Consonni, S., Lozza, G., and Macchi, E., 1989, “Optimization of Cogeneration Systems Operation—Part A: Prime Movers Modelization,” Proceedings of the 1989 ASME Cogen-Turbo Symposium, Nice, Aug., ASME, New York, pp. 313–322.
7.
Consonni, S., Lozza, G., and Macchi, E., 1989, “Optimization of Cogeneration Systems Operation—Part B: Solution Algorithm and Examples of Optimum Operating Strategies,” Proc. of the 1989 ASME Cogen-Turbo Symposium, Nice, France, Aug. ASME, New York, pp. 323–331.
8.
Anon., 2000, “Statistical Data on Electricity in Italy” GRTN, Italy.
9.
Bombarda, P., 2001, “Survey of Commercial ERC Performance,” Technical Report, Department of Energetics, Politecnico di Milano.
10.
Campanari
,
S.
,
2000
, “
Full Load and Part-Load Performance Prediction for Integrated SOFC and Microturbine Systems
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
122
, pp.
239
–
246
.
11.
Campanari, S., and Boncompagni, L., 2001, “Experimental Acquisition of Emission Data From a Commercial Microturbine,” Internal Technical Note, Department of Energetics, Politecnico di Milano.
12.
Anon., 1999, “Performance and Electrical Characterization Tests on a Microturbine Commercial Prototype,” EPRI-TR 114270, Dec.
13.
Carno¨, J., Cavani, A., and Liinanki, L., 1998, “Micro Gas Turbine for Combined Heat and Power in Distributed Generation,” ASME Paper 98-GT-309.
14.
Gliddon-Bush, C., 2001, “Micro Size, Maximum Efficiency,” Power Engineering International, Cogeneration supplement, PennWell, July.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.