The automotive catalytic converters, which are employed to reduce engine exhaust emissions, operate in transient conditions under all modes of operation. The fluctuation in air-fuel ratio is a major contributor to these transients. The consideration of these transients is essential in accurate modeling of catalyst operation during actual driving conditions. In this work, a numerical investigation is carried out to comprehend the dynamic response of three-way catalytic converters subjected to changes in air-fuel ratio. The mathematical model considers the coupling effect of heat and mass transfer with the catalyst reactions as exhaust gases flow through the catalyst. The converter dynamic response is studied by considering a converter operating under steady conditions, which is suddenly subjected to air-fuel ratio variations. Two types of imposed fluctuations (sinusoidal and step changes) are considered. The catalyst response is predicted by using a detailed chemical mechanism. The paper elucidates the effect of air-fuel modulations on the catalyst HC, CO, and NO conversion efficiencies.

Issue Section:
Emissions
Keywords:
automobiles, air pollution control, dynamic response, catalysis, air, fuel, internal combustion engines, combustion, heat transfer, mass transfer
Topics:
Catalysts, Dynamic response, Fuels, Oscillations, Catalytic converters, Fluctuations (Physics), Mass transfer, Oxygen
1.
Herz, R. K., 1987, “Dynamic Behavior of Automotive Three-Way Emission Control System,” Catalysis and Automotive Pollution Control, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 427–444.
2.
Herz
,
R. K.
,
1981
, “
Dynamic Behavior of Automotive Catalysts: 1. Catalyst Oxidation and Reduction
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev.
,
20
, pp.
451
–
457
.
3.
Silveston
,
P. L.
,
1995
, “
Automotive Exhaust Catalysis Under Periodic Operation
,”
Catalysis Today
,
25
, pp.
175
–
195
.
4.
Silveston
,
P. L.
,
1996
, “
Automotive Exhaust Catalysis: Is Periodic Operation Beneficial?
”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
51
, pp.
2419
–
2426
.
5.
Koltsakis
,
G. C.
, and
Stamatelos
,
A. M.
,
1999
, “
Dynamic Behavior Issues in Three-Way Catalyst Modeling
,”
AIChE J.
,
45
, pp.
603
–
614
.
6.
Shulman, M. A., Hamburg, D. R., and Throop, M. J., 1982, “Comparison of Measured and Predicted Three-Way Catalyst Conversion Efficiencies Under Dynamic Air-Fuel Ratio Conditions,” SAE Paper No. 820276.
7.
Herz
,
R. K.
,
Kleta
,
J. B.
, and
Sell
,
J. A.
,
1983
, “
Dynamic Behavior of Automotive Catalysts: 2. Carbon Monoxide Conversion Under Transient Air/Fuel Ratio Condition
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev.
,
22
, pp.
387
–
396
.
8.
Taylor
,
K. C.
, and
Sinkevitch
,
R. M.
,
1983
, “
Behavior of Automobile Exhaust Catalysts With Cycled Feed Streams
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev.
,
22
, pp.
45
–
50
.
9.
Schlatter
,
J. C.
,
Sinkevitch
,
R. M.
, and
Mitchell
,
P. J.
,
1983
, “
Laboratory Reactor System for Three-Way Automotive Catalyst Evaluation
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev.
,
22
, pp.
51
–
56
.
10.
Matsunga, S.-I., Yokota, K., Muraki, H., and Fujitani, Y., 1987, “Improvement of Engine Emissions Over Three-Way Catalyst by the Periodic Operation,” SAE Paper No. 872098.
11.
Schlatter
,
J. C.
, and
Mitchell
,
P. J.
,
1980
, “
Three-Way Catalyst Response to Transients
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev.
,
19
, pp.
288
–
293
.
12.
Cutlip
,
M. B.
,
1979
, “
Concentration Forcing of Catalytic Surface Rate Processes
,”
AIChE J.
,
25
, pp.
502
–
508
.
13.
Abdul-Kareem
,
H. K.
,
Silveston
,
P. L.
, and
Hudgins
,
R. R.
,
1980
, “
Forced Cycling of the Catalytic Oxidation of CO Over a V2O5 Catalyst—1”
,
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
35
, pp.
2077
–
2084
.
14.
Silveston
,
P. L.
,
Hudgins
,
R. R.
,
Adesina
,
A. A.
,
Ross
,
G. S.
, and
Feimer
,
J. L.
,
1986
, “
Activity and Selectivity Control through Periodic Composition Forcing Over Fischer-Tropsch Catalysts
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
41
, pp.
923
–
928
.
15.
Cho
,
B. K.
, and
West
,
L. A.
,
1988
, “
Cyclic Operation of Pt/Al2O3 Catalysts for CO Oxidation
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam.
,
25
, pp.
158
–
164
.
16.
Cho
,
B. K.
,
1988
, “
Performance of Pt/Al2O3 Catalysts in Automobile Engine Exhaust With Oscillatory Air/Fuel Ratio
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
27
, pp.
30
–
36
.
17.
Hoebink
,
J. H. B. J.
,
Marin
,
G. B.
, and
Huinink
,
J. P.
,
1997
, “
A Quantitative Analysis of Transient Kinetic Experiments: The Oxidation of CO by O2 Over Pt
,”
Appl. Catal., A
,
160
, pp.
139
–
151
.
18.
Shamim
,
T.
,
Shen
,
H.
,
Sengupta
,
S.
,
Son
,
S.
, and
Adamczyk
,
A. A.
,
2002
, “
A Comprehensive Model to Predict Three-Way Catalytic Converter Performance
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
124
, pp.
421
–
428
.
19.
Montreuil, C. N., Williams, S. C., and Adamczyk, A. A., 1992, “Modeling Current Generation Catalytic Converters: Laboratory Experiments and Kinetic Parameter Optimization—Steady State Kinetics,” SAE Paper No. 920096.
20.
Otto, N. C., 1984, private communication.
21.
Shamim, T., and Medisetty, V. C., 2001, “Dynamic Response of Automotive Catalytic Converters: The Role of Chemical Kinetic Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the Second Joint Meeting of the U.S. Sections of the Combustion Institute, Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, Paper No. 274.
22.
Moore, W. R., and Mondt, J. R., 1993, “Predicted Cold Start Emission Reductions Resulting From Exhaust Thermal Energy Conservation to Quicken Catalytic Converter Lightoff,” SAE Paper No. 931087.
Copyright © 2003
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.