This paper discusses novel schemes of combined cycle, where natural gas is chemically treated to remove carbon, rather than being directly used as fuel. Carbon conversion to CO2 is achieved before gas turbine combustion. Therefore CO2 can be removed from fuel (rather than from exhausts, thus utilizing less demanding equipment) and made available for long-term storage, to avoid dispersion toward the atmosphere and the consequent contribution to the greenhouse effect. The strategy here proposed to achieve this goal is natural gas partial oxidation. The second part of the paper will address steam/methane reforming. Partial oxidation is an exothermic oxygen-poor combustion devoted to CO and H2 production. The reaction products are introduced in a multiple stage shift reactor converting CO to CO2. Carbon dioxide is removed by means of physical or chemical absorption processes and made available for storage, after compression and liquefaction. The resulting fuel mainly consists of hydrogen and nitrogen, thus gas turbine exhausts are virtually devoid of CO2. The paper discusses the selection of some important parameters necessary to obtain a sufficient level of conversion in the various reactors (temperature and pressure levels, methane-to-air or methane-to-steam ratios) and their impact on the plant integration and on the thermodynamic efficiency. Overall performance (efficiency, power output, and carbon removal rate) is predicted by means of a computational tool developed by the authors. The results show that a net efficiency of 48.5 percent, with a 90 percent CO2 removal, can be obtained by combined cycles based on large heavy duty machines of the present technological status, either by using chemical or physical absorption.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Cycle Innovations
Keywords:
carbon compounds, oxygen compounds, emission, natural gas technology, gas turbines, combustion, oxidation
Topics:
Absorption, Carbon dioxide, Combined cycles, Gas turbines, Natural gas, Oxidation, Steam, Pressure, Emissions, Temperature, Carbon, Methane
1.
Chiesa
,
P.
, and
Lozza
,
G.
,
1998
, “
CO2 Emission Abatement in IGCC Power Plants by Semiclosed Cycles. Part A: With Oxygen-Blown Combustion
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
, pp.
635
–
641
.
2.
Chiesa
,
P.
, and
Lozza
,
G.
,
1998
, “
CO2 Emission Abatement in IGCC Power Plants by Semiclosed Cycles. Part B: With Air-Blown Combustion and CO2 Physical Absorption
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
, pp.
642
–
648
.
3.
Chiesa
,
P.
, and
Consonni
,
S.
,
1999
, “
Shift Reactors and Physical Absorption for Low CO2 Emission IGCCs
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
, pp.
295
–
305
.
4.
Chiesa, P., Consonni, S., and Lozza, G., 1998, “A Comparative Analysis of IGCCs With CO2 Sequestration,” Proc. of 4th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Interlaken, CH, pp. 107–112, Pergamon, Amsterdam, NL, Aug., Interlaken, Switzerland, Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp. 107–112.
5.
Smelser, S. C., Stock, R. M., and McCleary, G. J., 1991, “Engineering and Economic Evaluation of CO2 Removal From Fossil-Fuel-Fired Power Plants—Vol. 1, Pulverized-Coal-Fired Power Plants,” EPRI Report IE-7365.
6.
Eliasson, B., Riemer, P., and Wokaun, A., eds., 1999, Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Pergamon, Amsterdam.
7.
Chiesa, P., and Consonni, S., 1999, “Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycles With Low CO2 Emissions,” ASME paper 99-GT-370.
8.
Corti, A., Lombardi, L., and Manfrida, G. P., 1998, “Absorption of CO2 With Amines in Semiclosed GT Cycle: Plant Performance and Operating Costs,” ASME paper 98-GT-395.
9.
Mathieu P., and De Ruick J., 1993, “CO2 Capture in CC and IGCC Power Plants Using a CO2 Gas Turbine,” ASME Cogen-Turbo, Vol. 8, New York.
10.
Ulizar, I., and Pilidis, P., 1997 “Design of a Semiclosed Cycle Gas Turbine With Carbon Dioxide—Argon as Working Fluid,” ASME Paper 97-GT-125.
11.
Mathieu, Ph., and Nihart, R., 1998, “Zero Emission Matiant Cycle,” ASME Paper 98-GT-383.
12.
Schu¨tz, M., Daun, M., Weinspach, P. M., Krumbeck, M., and Hein, K. R. G., 1992, “Study on the CO2-Recovery From an IGCC Plant,” “Proceedings of the 1st Int’l Conference on Carbon Dioxide Removal,” Amsterdam, pp. 357–364.
13.
Audus H., Kaarstad O., and Skinne, G., 1998, “CO2 Capture by Precombustion Decarbonization of Natural Gas,” Proc. of 4th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Aug., Interlaken, Switzerland, Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp. 107–112.
14.
Doctor, R. D. et al., 1994, “Gasification Combined Cycle: Carbon Dioxide Recovery, Transport and Disposal,” U.S. Department of Energy, Contract No. W-31-109-Eng-38.
15.
Bordiga, G., and Campagna, M., 1999, “Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycles With Abatement of CO2 Emissions,” graduation thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Italy, in Italian.
16.
Consonni, S., Lozza, G., Macchi, E., Chiesa, P., and Bombarda, P., 1991, “Gas Turbine-Based Cycles for Power Generation. Part A: Calculation Model,” Proc. of International Gas Turbine Congress 1991, Oct., Yokohama, Japan, pp. III 201–210.
17.
Consonni, S., 1992, “Performance Prediction of Gas/Steam Cycles for Power Generation,” Ph.D. thesis No. 1893-T, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
18.
Lozza, G., 1990, “Bottoming Steam Cycles for Combined Gas-Steam Power Plants: A Theoretical Estimation of Steam Turbine Performance and Cycle Analysis,” Proc. 1990 ASME Cogen-Turbo, New Orleans, LA, ASME, New York, pp. 83–92.
19.
Anon., 1999, ASPEN PLUS, Release 10.1, Reference Manual.
20.
Chiesa, P., and Lozza, G., 1997, “Intercooled Advanced Gas Turbines in Coal Gasification Plants, With Combined or ‘HAT’ Power Cycle,” ASME paper 97-GT-039.
21.
Kohl, A., and Riesenfeld, F., 1985, Gas Purification, 4th Ed., Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.