Microturbines and fuel cells are currently attracting a lot of attention to meet future users needs in the distributed generation market. This paper addresses a preliminary analysis of a representative state-of-the-art 50-kW microturbine coupled with a high-temperature solid-oxide fuel cell (SOFC). The technologies of the two elements of such a hybrid-power plant are in a different state of readiness. The microturbine is in an early stage of pre-production and the SOFC is still in the development phase. It is premature to propose an optimum solution. Based on today’s technology the hybrid plant, using natural gas fuel, would have a power output of about 389 kW, and an efficiency of 60 percent. If the waste heat is used the overall fuel utilization efficiency would be about 80 percent. Major features, parameters, and performance of the microturbine and the SOFC are discussed. The compatibility of the two systems is addressed, and the areas of technical concern, and mismatching issues are identified and discussed. Fully understanding these, and identifying solutions, is the key to the future establishing of an optimum overall system. This approach is viewed as being in concert with evolving technological changes. In the case of the microturbine changes will be fairly minor as they enter production on a large scale within the next year or so, but are likely to be significant for the SOFC in the next few years, as extensive efforts are expended to reduce unit cost. It is reasonable to project that a high performance and cost-effective hybrid plant, with high reliability, will be ready for commercial service in the middle of the first decade of the 21st century. While several microturbines can be packaged to give an increased level of power, this can perhaps be more effectively accomplished by coupling just a single gas turbine module with a SOFC. The resultant larger power output unit opens up new market possibilities in both the industrial nations and developing countries.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Cycle Innovations
Keywords:
fuel cell power plants, gas turbines, solid oxide fuel cells, natural gas technology
Topics:
Fuel cells, Microturbines, Solid oxide fuel cells
1.
de Biasi, V., 1998, “Low Cost and High Efficiency Make 30 to 80 kW Microturbines Attractive,” Gas Turbine World, Jan.–Feb., 1999, pp. 26–31.
2.
Craig, P., 1997, “The Capstone Turbogenerator as an Alternative Power Source,” SAE Paper No. 970202.
3.
McDonald, C. F., 2000, “Low Cost Recuperator Concept for Microturbine Applications,” to be published.
4.
Rodgers, C., 1997, “Turbochargers to Small Gas Turbines,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-200.
5.
McDonald
,
C. F.
,
1996
, “
Heat Exchangers for Very Small Gas Turbines
,”
Intl. J. Turbo Jet Eng.
,
13
, No.
4
, pp.
239
–
261
.
6.
McDonald, C. F., 1999, “Emergence of Recuperated Gas Turbines for Power Generation,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-67.
7.
R&D Magazine, 1998, “Energy Spending Proposals Being Weighted by Congress,” Apr., pp. 22–26.
8.
McDonald, C. F., 1997, “Ceramic Heat Exchangers—The Key to High Efficiency in Very Small Gas Turbines,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-463.
9.
Moore
,
T.
,
1997
, “
Market Potential High for Fuel Cells
,”
EPRI J.
,
22
, No.
3
, pp.
6
–
17
.
10.
Scientific American, 1999, “The Future of Fuel Cells,” July, 72–83.
11.
Modern Power Systems, 1998, “Westervoort SOFC: The Road to Commercialization,” May, pp. 29–32.
12.
Bevc, F. P., et al., 1996, “Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Combined Cycles,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-447.
13.
Stephenson, D., and Ritchey, I., 1997, “Parametric Study of Fuel Cell and Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Performance,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-340.
14.
Veyo, S. O., and Lundberg, W. L., 1999, “Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Power System Cycles,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-419.
15.
Liese, E. A., et al., 1999, “Technical Development Issues and Dynamic Modeling of Gas Turbine and Fuel Cell Hybrid Systems,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-360.
16.
White, D. J., 1999, “Hybrid Gas Turbine and Fuel Cell Systems in Perspective Review,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-410.
17.
Ali, S. A., and Moritz, R. R., 1999, “The Hybrid Cycle: Integration of Turbomachinery With a Fuel Cell,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-361.
18.
Campanari, S., and Macchi, E., 1998, “Thermodynamic Analysis of Advanced Power Cycles Based Upon Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and Gas Turbines and Ranking Bottoming Cycles,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-585.
19.
Massardo, A. F., and Lubelli, F., 1998, “Internal Reforming Solid Oxide Fuel Cell—Gas Turbine Combined Cycles (IRSOFC-GT), Part A: Cell Model and Cycle Thermodynamic Analysis,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-577.
20.
Campanari, S., 1999, “Full Load and Part Load Performance Prediction for Integrated SOFC and Microturbine Systems,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-65.
21.
Campanari, S., and Macchi, E., 1999, “The Combination of SOFC and Microturbine for Civil and Industrial Cogeneration,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-84.
22.
Leeper, J. D., 1999, “The Hybrid Cycle: Integration of a Fuel Cell With a Gas Turbine,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-430.
23.
de Biasi, V., 1999, “250 kW Fuel Cell-Gas Turbine Hybrid to Start Operational Testing,” Gas Turbine World, July–Aug., pp. 12–16.
24.
Rodgers, C., 1993, “Small (10–200 kW) Turbogenerator Design Considerations,” ASME COGEN-TURBO, IGTI Vol. 8, ASME, New York.
25.
McDonald, C. F., 1997, “A Leak-Proof Plate-Fin Heat Exchanger Concept for Process Industries,” Proceedings of 32nd IECEC Conference, Vol. 2, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, pp. 1497–1502.
26.
Armstrong
,
L.
,
1999
, “
Energy Ideas for the 21st Century
,”
Bus. Week
,
23
, p.
84
84
.
27.
Rodgers, C., 2000, “25-5 kW Microturbine Design Considerations,” to be published.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.