A five times scale model of an engine brush seal has been manufactured. The bristle stiffness and pressure were chosen to satisfy close similarity of the relevant non-dimensional parameters, and the choice of parameters is described. The comparison of flow characteristics for the model seal and an engine seal confirmed the non-dimensional similarity. Detailed pressure measurements were performed within the bristle pack by employing hollow bristles. This novel measurement allowed insight to be obtained into the operation of both clearance and interference seals. In particular, the measured pressure variation in the region of the bristle tips was significant. The deflection of the bristles was determined by comparing the bristle tip pressures with the static pressures along the shaft. Hence the compaction of the pack in this region was found directly. A numerical modeling of brush seals employing anisotropic flow resistance has been developed. Predictions were compared with the measured pressure distributions within the pack. This enabled sensible selection of the pack resistance distribution to be made. Although uniform anisotropic resistance throughout the pack gave reasonable flow rate characteristics, the pressure distribution was not reproduced. A variation of resistance coefficient consistent with the observed compaction was required to give a solution comparable with the experiments. [S0742-4795(00)01703-8]

1.
Steinetz, B. M., Hendricks, R. C., and Munson, J., 1998, “Advanced Seal Technology Role in Meeting Next Generation Turbine Engine Goals,” NASA/TM-1998-206961, AVT-PPS Paper No. 11, April 1998.
2.
Braun, M. J., Hendricks, R. C., and Cannaci, V. A., 1990, “Flow Visualization in a Simulated Brush Seal,” ASME Paper 90-GT-217.
3.
Braun
,
M. J.
, and
Kudriavtsev
,
V. V.
,
1995
, “
A Numerical Simulation of a Brush Seal Section and Some Experimental Results
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
117
, pp.
190
202
.
4.
Chen, L. H., Wood, P. E., Jones, T. V., and Chew, J. W., 1998, “An Iterative CFD and Mechanical Brush Seal Model and Comparison with Experimental Results,” ASME-98-GT-372.
5.
Turner, M. T., Chew, J. W., and Long, C. A., 1997, “Experimental Investigation and Mathematical Modelling of Clearance Brush Seals,” ASME Paper 97-GT-282.
6.
Chew
,
J. W.
, and
Hogg
,
S. I.
,
1997
, “
Porosity Modelling of Brush Seals
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
199
, pp.
769
775
.
7.
Hendricks, R. C., Schlumberger, S., Brown, M. J., Choy, F., and Mullen, R. L., 1991, “A Bulk Flow Model of a Brush Seal System,” ASME Paper 91-GT-325.
8.
Chen, L. H., 1998, “Numerical and Experimental Modelling of Brush Seals,” D. Phil thesis, University of Oxford, U.K.
9.
Wood, P. E., and Jones, T. V., 1997, “A Test Facility for the Measurement of Torques at the Shaft to Seal Interface in Brush Seals,” ASME Paper 97-GT-184.
You do not currently have access to this content.