A new procedure being developed in British Standards for the assessment of creep-rupture data is described and evaluated with trial data sets of gas turbine blading materials. The procedure is applied in phases. An important development by statistical experts is a framework for the main assessment phase that uses maximum-likelihood fitting methods for the treatment of unfailed test points and error variance. The framework selects models from a standard suite (together with any other linear models supplied by the assessor) using statistical criteria, but also incorporates metallurgical judgement. The improved representation of the experimental data compared with previous fitting methods and the associated statistical tests indicate that the new procedure can be used to derive rupture strength values for gas turbine materials with confidence.

1.
BS PD 6525, 1990, Elevated Temperature Properties for Steels for Pressure Purposes: Part 1—Stress Rupture Properties, British Standards Institution, London, UK.
2.
BS PD 6605 (draft), Guidance on the Methodology for the Analysis of Stress Rupture Data, British Standards Institution, London, UK. (For further information contact either the author, or Dr. S. R. Holdsworth, GEC ALSTHOM Turbine Generators, Newbold Road, Rugby, CV21 2NH, UK.)
3.
Conway, J. B., 1969, Stress-Rupture Parameters: Origin, Calculation and Use, Gordon and Breach, New York.
4.
Dulieu, D., ed., 1982, “The Properties of Steels at High Temperatures,” CEC Report: EUR 7615 EN.
5.
EPRI Publication FP-1062, 1979, final report of research project 638-1, Electric Power Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
6.
Francis, B., Green, M., Payne, C., eds., 1993, “GLIM System Release 4 Manual,” Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
7.
Goldhoff, R. M., 1973, “Towards the Standardization of Time-Temperature-Parameter in Elevated Temperature Data Analysis,” Proceedings of Conference on Creep and Fatigue, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA.
8.
Holdsworth, S. R., 1996a, “Review of WG1 Evaluation of Creep Rupture Data Assessment Methods. Recommendation Validation,” European Creep Collaborative Committee Recommendations—Appendix C of Volume 5, Doc Ref. 5524/MC/68 Issue II. (For further information contact Dr. S. R. Holdsworth, GEC ALSTHOM Turbine Generators, Newbold Road, Rugby, CV21 2NH, UK)
9.
Holdsworth, S. R., 1996b, “Guidance for the Assessment of Creep Rupture, Creep Strain and Stress Relaxation Data,” European Creep Collaborative Committee Recommendations—Volume 5, Doc Ref. 5524/MC/68 Issue II. (For further information contact Dr. S. R. Holdsworth, GEC ALSTHOM Turbine Generators, Newbold Road, Rugby, CV21 2NH, UK)
10.
Ivarrson, B., 1986, “Evaluation of Different Methods for Extrapolation of Creep Rupture Data,” Report IM-1794, Swedish Institute for Metals Research, Stockholm, Sweden.
11.
Larson
F. R.
,
Miller
J.
,
1952
, “
A Time-Temperature Relationship for Rupture and Creep Stresses
,”
Trans., ASME
, Vol.
74
, pp.
765
775
.
12.
Manson, S. S., 1968, “Time-Temperature-Parameters—A Re-evaluation and Some New Approaches,” Proceedings of Materials Engineering Congress, ASM Publication D8-100, ASM, Metals Park, OH, p. 1.
13.
Manson, S. S., Haferd, A. M., 1953, “A Linear Time-Temperature Relation for Extrapolation of Creep and Stress-Rupture Data,” NACA TN 2890.
14.
Manson, S. S., Succop, G., 1954, “Stress Rupture Properties of Inconel 700 and Correlation on the Basis of Several Time-Temperature Parameters,” ASTM STP No 174., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, p. 40.
15.
Orr
L. R.
,
Sherby
O. D.
,
Dorn
J. E.
,
1954
, “
Correlations of Rupture Data for Metals at Elevated Temperatures
,”
Transactions, ASM
, Vol.
46
, pp.
113
128
.
16.
Piearcey, B. J., and Bullough, C. K., 1997, “An On-line Materials Database for the Design of Gas Turbine Components,” ASME Paper 97-GT-167, presented at Turbo Expo ’97—Land Sea and Air, June 2–5, 1997, Orlando, FL.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.