A two-control-volume model is employed for honeycomb-stator/smooth-rotor seals, with a conventional control-volume used for the throughflow and a “capacitance-accumulator” model for the honeycomb cells. The control volume for the honeycomb cells is shown to cause a dramatic reduction in the effective acoustic velocity of the main flow, dropping the lowest acoustic frequency into the frequency range of interest for rotordynamics. In these circumstances, the impedance functions for the seals cannot be modeled with conventional (frequency-independent) stiffness, damping, and mass coefficients. More general transform functions are required to account for the reaction forces, and the transfer functions calculated here are a lead-lag term for the direct force function and a lag term for the cross-coupled function. Experimental measurements verify the magnitude and phase trends of the proposed transfer functions. These first-order functions are simple, compared to transfer functions for magnetic bearings or foundations. For synchronous response due to imbalance, they can be approximated by running-speed-dependent stiffness and damping coefficients in conventional rotordynamics codes. Correct predictions for stability and transient response will require more general algorithms, presumably using a state-space format.

1.
Bolleter, U., Leibundgut, E., Stu¨rchler, R., and McCloskey, T., 1989, “Hydraulic Interaction and Excitation Forces of High Head Pump Impellers,” in: Pumping Machinery—1989, Proceedings of the Third Joint ASCE/ASME Mechanics Conference, La Jolla, CA, pp. 187–194.
2.
Childs
D.
,
Nelson
C.
,
Nicks
C.
,
Scharrer
J.
,
Elrod
D.
, and
Hale
K.
,
1986
, “
Theory Versus Experiment for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Annular Gas Seals: Part I—Test Facility and Apparatus
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
108
, pp.
426
432
.
3.
Childs, D., 1993, Turbomachinery Rotordynamics: Phenomena, Modeling, and Analysis, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 243–248.
4.
Childs
D.
, and
Hale
K.
,
1994
, “
A Test Apparatus and Facility to Identify the Rotordynamic Coefficients of High-Speed Hydrostatic Bearings
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
116
, pp.
337
344
.
5.
Elrod
D.
,
Nelson
C.
, and
Childs
D.
,
1989
, “
An Entrance Region Friction Factor Model Applied to Annular Seals Analysis: Theory vs. Experiment for Smooth and Honeycomb Seals
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
111
, pp.
337
343
.
6.
Elrod
D.
,
Childs
D.
, and
Nelson
C.
,
1990
, “
An Annular Gas Seal Analysis Using Empirical Entrance and Exit Region Friction Factors
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
112
, pp.
254
258
.
7.
Ha
T. W.
,
Morrison
G. L.
, and
Childs
D.
,
1992
, “
Friction-Factor Characteristics for Narrow-Channels With Honeycomb Surfaces
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
114
, pp.
714
721
.
8.
Ha
T.
, and
Childs
D.
,
1994
, “
Annular Honeycomb-Stator Turbulent Gas Seal Analysis Using New Friction-Factor Model Based on Flat Plate Tests
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
116
, pp.
352
360
.
9.
Hirs
G.
,
1973
, “
A Bulk-Flow Theory for Turbulence in Lubricating Films
,”
ASME Journal of Lubrication Technology
, Vol.
95
, pp.
137
146
.
10.
Lindsey, W. T., and Childs, D. W., 1995, “The Effects of Converging and Diverging Axial Taper on the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Liquid Annular Pressure Seals: Theory Versus Experiment,” presented at the 1995 ASME Vibration Conference, Boston, MA, Sept.
11.
Melsa, J., and Shultz, D., 1969, Linear Control Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.
12.
Nelson
C.
,
1984
, “
Analysis for Leakage and Rotordynamic Coefficients of Surface-Roughened Tapered Annular Gas Seals
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
106
, pp.
927
934
.
13.
Nelson
C.
,
1985
, “
Rotordynamic Coefficients for Compressible Flow in Tapered Annular Seals
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
107
, pp.
318
325
.
14.
Palazzolo, A. B., Tang, P., Brown, G., DiRusso, E., and Kascak, A., 1993, “An Electromechanical Simulation Method for Active Vibration Control of a Magnetic Bearing Supported Rotor,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-382.
15.
Pelletti, J., and Childs, D., 1991, “A Comparison of Experimental Results and Theoretical Predictions for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Short (L/D =1/6) Labyrinth Seals,” Proc. 1991 ASME Design Technical Conference, ASME DE-Vol-35, pp. 69–76.
16.
Potter, M., and Foss, J., 1982, Fluid Mechanics, Great Lakes Press, Inc., Okemos, MI, pp. 477–481.
17.
Scharrer
J.
,
1989
, discussion of the paper, “
Annular Honeycomb Seals: Test Results for Leakage and Rotordynamic Coefficients; Comparisons to Labyrinth and Smooth Configurations
,” by Childs et al.,
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
111
, pp.
293
301
.
18.
Sorokes, J., Kuzdzal, M., Sandberg, M., and Colby, G., 1994, “Recent Experiences in Full Load Full Pressure Shop Testing of a High Pressure Gas Injection Centrifugal Compressor,” Proc. Twenty-Third Turbomachinery Symposium, The Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, pp. 3–17.
19.
Thompson, P., 1988, Compressible-Fluid Dynamics, pp. 155–234.
20.
Zeidan, F., Perez, R., and Stephenson, E., 1993, “The Use of Honeycomb Seals in Stabilizing Two Centrifugal Compressors,” Proc. Twenty-Second Turbomachinery Symposium, The Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, pp. 3–15.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.