This paper assesses the scales at which commercial, first-generation biomass integrated-gasifier/gas turbine combined cycle (BIG/GTCC) technology is likely to be most economic when fueled by plantation-derived biomass. First-generation BIG/GTCC systems are likely to be commercially offered by vendors beginning around 2000 and will be based on either pressurized or atmospheric-pressure gasification. Both plant configurations are considered here, with estimates of capital and operating costs drawn from published and other sources. Prospective costs of a farm-grown energy crop (switchgrass) delivered to a power plant are developed with the aid of a geographic information system (GIS) for agricultural regions in the North Central and Southeast US in the year 2000 and 2020. A simplified approach is applied to estimate the cost of delivering chipped eucalyptus from an existing plantation in Northeast Brazil. The “optimum” capacity (MWopt), defined as that which yields the minimum calculated cost of electricity (COEm), varies by geographic region due to differences in delivered biomass costs. With pressurized BIG/GTCC plants, MWopt is in the range of 230–320 MWe for the sites considered, assuming most of the land around the power plant is farmed for energy crop production. For atmospheric-pressure BIG/GTCC plants, MWopt ranges from 110 to 142 MWe. When a lower fraction of the land around a plant is used for energy farming, values for MWopt are smaller than these. In all cases, the cost of electricity is relatively insensitive to plant capacity over a wide range around MWopt.

1.
Anon., 1994, “Biomass Looks Good for Gasification Process,” Modern Power Systems, Apr., pp. 61–65.
2.
Barducci, G., Daddi, P., Polzinetti, G., and Ulivieri, P., 1995, “Thermic and Electric Power Production and Use From Gasification of Biomass and RDF: Experience at CFBG Plant at Greve in Chianti,” Proc. Second Biomass Conference of the Americas: Energy Environment, Agriculture, and Industry, NREL/CP-200–8098, National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO, pp. 565–575.
3.
Blackadder, W. H., Lundberg, H., Rensfelt, E., and Waldheim, L., 1994, “Heat and Power Production via Gasification in the Range 5–50 MWe,” Advances in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, A. V. Bridgwater, ed., Blackie Academic & Professional, London, pp. 449–75.
4.
Bodlund, B., Bergman, J., and Lindman, N., 1993, “Power From Biomass in Sweden,” Proc. Strategic Benefits of Biomass and Waste Fuels, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
5.
Brown, R. C., 1994, The Potential of Biomass Production and Conversion in Iowa, Report from Iowa State Univ. to the Iowa Energy Center, ISU-ERI-Ames95009, Ames, IA.
6.
Carpentieri
A. E.
,
Larson
E. D.
, and
Woods
J.
,
1993
, “
Future Biomass-Based Power Generation in Northeast Brazil
,”
Biomass and Bioenergy
, Vol.
4
(
3
), pp.
149
173
.
7.
Consonni
S.
, and
Larson
E. D.
,
1996
a, “
Biomass-Gasifier/Aeroderivative Gas Turbine Combined Cycles Part B: Technologies and Performance Modeling
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
118
, pp.
507
515
.
8.
Consonni
S.
, and
Larson
E. D.
,
1996
b, “
Biomass-Gasifier/Aeroderivative Gas Turbine Combined Cycles Part B: Performance Calculations and Economic Assessment
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
118
, pp.
516
525
.
9.
Cooper, J. T., 1995, “Agro-Energy: Redefining Energy and Agriculture in Iowa,” Proc. Second Biomass Conference of the Americas: Energy Environment, Agriculture, and Industry, NREL/CP-200-8098, National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO, pp. 1592–1600.
10.
Council of Economic Advisors, 1995, Economic Indicators, USGPO, Washington, DC.
11.
Craig, K. R., Mann, M. K., and Bain, R. L., 1994, “Cost and Performance Potential of Advanced Integrated Biomass Gasification Combined Cycle Systems,” Proc. Cogen Turbo Power ’94, ASME, New York, pp. 641–654.
12.
DWEB (Dept. for Welfare, Economy, and Management), 1994, Gasification of Biomass for Electricity Generations, Plan of Approach for the Construction of an Integrated 15–30 MWe System, Haarlem, Province of North Holland, The Netherlands, May.
13.
EIA (Energy Information Administration), 1995, Supplement to the Annual Energy Outlook 1995, DOE/EIA-0554(95), USGPO, Wash. DC.
14.
Elliott, P. (Shell International Petroleum Company, London), 1994, personal communication to R. Williams (Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ), Oct. 26.
15.
Elliott, T. P., and Booth, R., 1993, Brazilian Biomass Power Demonstration Project, Special Project Brief, Shell International Petroleum Company, London.
16.
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute), 1993a, TAG Technical Assessment Guide, Vol. 1, Electricit, Supply—1993 (Rev. 7), TR-102275-V1R7, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA.
17.
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute), 1993b, Strategic Analysis of Biomass and Waste Fuels for Electric Power Generation, TR-102773, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA.
18.
Feldmann, H. F., Paisley, M. A., Appelbaum, H. R., and Taylor, D. R., 1988, Conversion of Forest Residues to a Methane-Rich Gas in a High-Throughput Gasifier, PNL-6570, Pacific Northwest Lab, Richland, Washington.
19.
Herbert, P. K., Baguss, I., and Loeffler, J. C., 1988, “Low-btu Gas From Bark and Waste Via CFB Gasification,” Proc. Energy From Biomass and Wastes XII, Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago.
20.
Hohenstein, W. G., and Wright, L. L., 1994, “Biomass Energy Production in the United States: an Overview,” Biomass and Bioenergy, pp. 161–173.
21.
Horvath, A. (Enviropower, Espoo, Finland), 1995, personal communication to E. Larson, Oct. 9.
22.
IGS (Iowa Geological Survey), 1973, “Resource Development Land and Water Use Management, Eleven County Area South Central Iowa,” Iowa City, Iowa.
23.
Kinoshita, C. M., 1995, “Bagasse Gasification for Electricity Generation in Sugar/Alcohol Plants,” presentation at the Workshop on Perspectives for Alcohol Fuel in Brazil, Univ. of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, June 28–29.
24.
Larson, E. D., and Hughes, W. E. M., 1996, “Performance Modeling of Aeroderivative Steam-Injected Gas Turbines and Combined Cycle Systems Fueled From Fixed or Fluid-Bed Biomass Gasifiers,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-89.
25.
Lau, F. S., Carty, R. H., Onischak, M., and Bain, R. L., 1993, “Development of the IGT Renugas Process,” Proc. Strategic Benefits of Biomass and Waste Fuels, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
26.
Lundberg, H. (TPS, Stockholm, Sweden), 1994, personal communication to R. Williams (Center for Energy and Environmental Studies, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ), Oct. 29.
27.
Maniatis, K., and Ferrero, G.-L., 1995, “The Thermie Targeted Projects on Biomass Gasification,” Proc. Second Biomass Conference of the Americas: Energy Environment, Agriculture, and Industry, NREL/CP-200-8098, National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO, pp. 576–585.
28.
Marrison, C. I., 1995, The Effect of Plant Size on the Economics of Producing Energy From Biomass, Working Paper 133, Ctr. Energy & Environ. Studies, Princeton U., Princeton, NJ, June.
29.
Marrison, C. I., and Larson, E. D., 1995a, “Cost Versus Scale for Advanced Plantation-Based Biomass Energy Systems in the U.S.,” Proc. Symposium on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Research, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
30.
Marrison, C. I., and Larson, E. D., 1995b, “Cost Versus Scale for Advanced Plantation-Based Biomass Energy Systems in the U.S.,” Proc. Second Biomass Conference of the Americas: Energy Environment, Agriculture, and Industry, NREL/CP-200-8098, National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO, pp. 1272–1290.
31.
Paisley, M. A., and Farris, G., 1995, “Development and Commercialization of a Biomass Gasification/Power Generation System,” Proc. Second Biomass Conference of the Americas: Energy Environment, Agriculture, and Industry, NREL/CP-200-8098, National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO, pp. 553–564.
32.
Paisley, M. A., and Gebhard, S. C., 1995, “Gas Cleanup for Combined Cycle Power Generation Using a Hot Gas Conditioning Catalyst,” Proc. Second Biomass Conference of the Americas: Energy Environment, Agriculture, and Industry, NREL/CP-200-8098, National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO, pp. 617–629.
33.
Puhakka, M. (General Manager, Bioflow Ltd., Varkhaus, Finland), 1994, personal communication to E. Larson, Feb.
34.
Stahl, K., Skog, E., and Lundqvist, R., 1993, “The Biomass IGCC Demonstration Power Plant, Varnamo, Sweden,” Proc. 12th Coal Gasification Conference, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
35.
Sydkraft AB, 1995, Gas Operations Start Up at Sydkraft’s Unique Biofueled Plant in Varnamo, Sweden, press release, Malmo, Sweden, Oct. 5.
36.
TPS, 1995, Swedish Technology Selected for Prestigous BioEnergy Project in Brazil, press release, Stockholm, Sweden, Sept. 7.
37.
UMinn (Univ. of Minnesota), 1994, Sustainable Biomass Energy Production, Vol. 1, Dedicated Feedstock Energy Supply, for National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO, Sept.
38.
USGS (United States Geological Survey), 1986, 1:100000 scale topographic map, Appanoose County, Lucas County, Monroe County, Wayne County.
39.
Walsh, M. E., and Graham, R., 1995, Biomass Feedstock Supply Analysis: Production Costs, Land Availability, Yields, Biomass Feedstock Development Pgm., Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 18 Jan.
40.
Wiant, B. C., Bachovchin, D. M., Alvin, M. A., Onischak, M., Carty, R. H., and Knight, R. A., 1995, “Testing Status of the Biomass Gasification Hot Gas Cleanup Demonstration Program,” paper presented at (but not in Proceedings) Second Biomass Conference of the Americas: Energy, Environment, Agriculture, and Industry, Portland, OR, Aug. 21–24.
41.
Williams, R. H., and Larson, E. D., 1993, “Advanced Gasification-Based Biomass Power Generation,” in Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity, T. B. Johansson, H. Kelly, A. K. N. Reddy, and R. H. Williams, eds., Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 729–785.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.