Unusual resonant responses were observed during spin pit tests of shrouded blades. The unusual behavior consisted of blades that exhibited strong response over a broad range of frequencies. The frequencies of peak resonance were considerably lower than predicted and were also lower than those observed in other tests of nominally identical wheels. In addition, the tracking plots of blade amplitudes versus frequency were truncated rather than displaying the usual sharp peaks seen in other tests. The unusual response is potentially dangerous since high vibratory response could be excited over a broad range of operating speeds. The blades were designed to be free standing with gaps of approximately 0.25 mm between neighboring shrouds. It is hypothesized that shroud contact at the blade tips could cause the unusual vibratory response. A simple model of a blade with shroud contact is developed in order to determine if shroud contact could cause blades to vibrate in the observed manner. The model is unusual in that it seeks to explore how contact could cause the blade to respond at lower (rather than higher) frequencies since contact typically increases the constraints on a structure and raises its natural frequencies.

1.
Griffin
J. H.
, and
Hoosac
T. M.
, “
Model Development and Statistical Investigation of Turbine Blade Mistuning
,”
ASME Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design
, Vol.
106
,
1984
, pp.
204
210
.
2.
Whitehead
D. S.
, “
Effect of Mistuning on the Vibrations of Turbomachine Blades Induced by Wakes
,”
Journal of Mechanical Science
, Vol.
8
, No.
1
,
1966
, pp.
15
21
.
3.
Ewins, D. J., “Vibration Modes of Mistuned Bladed Disks,” ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER, 1976, pp. 349–355.
4.
Wagner
L. F.
, and
Griffin
J. H.
, “
Blade Vibration With Nonlinear Tip Constraint: Model Development
,”
ASME Journal of Turbomachinery
, Vol.
112
, No.
4
,
1990
, pp.
778
785
.
5.
Watanabe
T.
, “
Forced Vibration of Nonlinear System With Symmetrical Piecewise-Linear Characteristics
,”
Bulletin of JSME
, Vol.
27
, No.
229
,
1984
, pp.
1493
1498
.
6.
Nguyen
D. T.
,
Noah
S. T.
, and
Kettleborough
C. F.
, “
Impact Behavior of an Oscillator With Limiting Stops, Part I: A Parametric Study
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
109
, No.
2
,
1986
, pp.
293
307
.
7.
Meirovitch, L., Analytical Methods in Vibration, Macmillan, New York, 1967.
8.
Rao, S. S., Mechanical Vibrations, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, New York, 1990, pp. 548–549.
9.
Hughes
T. J. R.
, “
A Note on the Stability of Newmark’s Algorithm in Nonlinear Structural Dynamics
,”
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
, Vol.
11
,
1976
, pp.
383
387
.
10.
Brigham, E. O., The Fast Fourier Transform, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1974.
11.
Gelb, A., and Vander Velde, W. E., Multiple-Input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.
12.
Dowell
E. H.
, “
Component Mode Analysis of a Simple Non-linear, Non-conservative System
,”
Journal of Sound and Vibration
, Vol.
80
,
1982
, pp.
233
246
.
13.
Cameron
T. M.
, and
Griffin
J. H.
, “
An Alternating Frequency/Time Domain Method for Calculating the Steady-State Response of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
56
(
1
),
1989
, pp.
149
154
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.