The Machinery and Engine Technology (MET) Program of the National Research Council of Canada (NRCC) has established a program for the evaluation of sensors to measure gas turbine engine performance accurately. The precise measurement of fuel flow is an essential part of steady-state gas turbine performance assessment. Prompted by an international engine testing and information exchange program, and a mandate to improve all aspects of gas turbine performance evaluation, the MET Laboratory has critically examined two types of fuel flowmeters, Coriolis and turbine. The two flowmeter types are different in that the Coriolis flowmeter measures mass flow directly, while the turbine flowmeter measures volumetric flow, which must be converted to mass flow for conventional performance analysis. The direct measurement of mass flow, using a Coriolis flowmeter, has many advantages in field testing of gas turbines, because it reduces the risk of errors resulting from the conversion process. Turbine flowmeters, on the other hand, have been regarded as an industry standard because they are compact, rugged, reliable, and relatively inexpensive. This paper describes the project objectives, the experimental installation, and the results of the comparison of the Coriolis and turbine-type flowmeters in steady-state performance testing. Discussed are variations between the two types of flowmeters due to fuel characteristics, fuel handling equipment, acoustic and vibration interference, and installation effects. Also included in this paper are estimations of measurement uncertainties for both types of flowmeter. Results indicate that the agreement between Coriolis and turbine-type flowmeters is good over the entire steady-state operating range of a typical gas turbine engine. In some cases the repeatability of the Coriolis flowmeter is better than the manufacturer’s specification. Even a significant variation in fuel density (10 percent), and viscosity (300 percent) did not appear to compromise the ability of the Coriolis flowmeter to match the performance of the turbine flowmeter.

1.
FTI, 1982, “Installation, Operation and Maintenance Manual Omnitrak,” Flow Technology, Inc., 4250 East Broadway Road, Phoenix, AZ 85040.
2.
Furness
R. A.
,
1991
, “
BS7405: The Principles of Flowmeter Selection
,”
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
, Vol.
2
, Oct. pp.
233
242
.
3.
Grabe, W., 1988, “Fuel Flow Measurement in Gas Turbine Testing,” Division of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario, TR-ENG-001 (NRC No. 29808).
4.
Grabe, W., 1991, “Turbine Flowmeter Calibration,” Institute for Mechanical Engineering, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario, CAT-ENG-013.
5.
Keita
N. M.
,
1989
, “
Contribution to the Understanding of the Zero Shift Effects in Coriolis Mass Flowmeters
,”
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
, Vol.
1
, Oct. pp.
39
43
.
6.
MacLeod, J. D., 1987, “Evaluation of the EXAC Mass Flowmeter,” Division of Mechanical Engineering, National Research Council, Ottawa, Ontario, CAT-ENG-002.
7.
MacLeod, J. D., and Orbanski, B., 1992, “Turbine Rebuild Effects on Gas Turbine Performance,” ASME Paper No. 92-GT-23.
8.
Paik
J. S.
,
Lim
K. W.
,
Lee
K. B.
,
1990
, “
Calibration of Coriolis Mass Flowmeters Using a Dynamic Weighing Method
,”
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
, Vol.
1
, Apr. pp.
171
175
.
9.
Schlumberger Industries Inc., 1991, “M-dot Direct Mass Flowmeter With Datamate 2000 Operating and Maintenance Manual.”
10.
Zimmerman, R., and Deery, D., 1977, “Handbook for Turbine Flowmeter Systems,” Flow Technology Inc., 4250 East Broadway Road, Phoenix, AZ 85040.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.