The work reports an experimental study of the effect of swirl on the structure of a liquid spray, i.e., on the behavior of drops and their interaction with the gaseous phase, and on the velocity and turbulence fields of the spray in the swirling flow. Three vane-type swirlers having low, medium, and high swirl numbers were used in the tests. The swirlers were placed on the liquid supply tube of a pressure atomizer and tested in the wind tunnel under specified conditions. Properties of the dispersed phase such as velocity and size distributions, particle number density, and volume flux were measured at several locations within the swirling flow field. In addition, mean velocity and turbulence properties were obtained for the gas phase. The results show that flow reversal of the drops is present at the high swirl number within the recirculation region. The spatial distribution of drops reveals a widening of the spray with increasing swirl strength while the concentration of large drops is shown to increase near the core of the swirling field with increasing swirl number. Plots of the turbulence kinetic energy, normal Reynolds stresses, and Reynolds shear stresses show double-peak radial distributions, which indicate regions in the flow where high energy content, mean velocity gradients, and large shear forces are present. The decay of turbulence velocities in the axial direction was observed to be very fast, an indication of high diffusion and dissipation rates of the kinetic energy of turbulence. The significance of the turbulence measurements is that these double-peak profiles indicate a deviation of the swirling spray from isotropy. This information should be relevant to researchers modeling these complex flows.
The Effect of Swirl on the Velocity and Turbulence Fields of a Liquid Spray
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Bren˜a de la Rosa, A., Wang, G., and Bachalo, W. D. (January 1, 1992). "The Effect of Swirl on the Velocity and Turbulence Fields of a Liquid Spray." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. January 1992; 114(1): 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2906309
Download citation file: