Abstract

A study of the etiology, anatomic location, victim demographics and legal disposition of bite mark cases was made with the purpose of updating and augmenting previous research in the field. The information may be of interest to a myriad of professional disciplines including Forensic Odontologists, Medical Examiners, Detectives, Profilers, Emergency Room Personnel, Coroners, Psychologists, and Family Service Counselors, as bite marks provide both physical and biological data. While bite marks were found on all anatomic regions of the body some sites are significantly more likely to receive bites, and the frequency that an area is bitten may vary with the type of crime. Sex and age of the victim may also impact the resulting location and frequency of bites.

A survey form for bite mark cases was created and mailed to all Diplomates of the American Board of Forensic Odontology. The survey form was also included in the American Society of Forensic Odontology newsletter. The survey requested that the recipient fill out a separate form for each case for which the recipient was the primary investigator of a patterned injury. The data from the resulting surveys were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The responses detailed two hundred thirty two (259) bite mark cases that included seven hundred (778) individual bite marks. Harvey (1976) and Sweet and Pretty (2000) published studies finding the highest percentage of bites to the breasts. In 1983 Vale and Noguchi published the paper indicating that the most frequently bitten area was the upper extremities.

The survey forms were sent to approximately 1100 forensic dentist in 26 countries. The forensic experience level of the dentists varied from neophyte to very experienced. The data were analyzed and the results reported and organized in the following categories; Victim Distribution by Gender, Victim Distribution by Age, Child Abuse Distribution by Age and Gender, Sexual Assault Distribution by age and Gender, Homicide Distribution by Age and Gender, Bite Mark Distribution by Gender and Location, Number of Bite Marks per Victim, Bite mark Distribution Comparison to Previous Research, Child Abuse Suspect Age Distribution by Age and Sex, Homicide Suspect Age Distribution by Age and Sex, Sexual Crimes Suspect Age Distribution by Age and Sex, and Bite Mark Incidence by Anatomical Area and Type of Crime.

Fifty-two forensic odontologists from seven countries responded. Nineteen responders were Diplomates of the American Board of Forensic Odontology. The number of cases reported by each responder ranged from one to thirty-three and the average number of cases reported was 4.5. In this broad based study, females were bitten more often than males. The average male victim was younger than the average female victim. Males that were victims tended to be either very young or very old. The youngest victim was a two-month-old boy and the oldest victim a 95-year-old woman. Perpetrators were male more often than female and there was an average of 1.4 suspects per case. The results show that most bites occurred on the arm, followed by the breast. If broken down by gender, males were bitten on the arm more than females, and females were bitten on the breast more often than males. The data show patterns in location and number of bites that seem related to both the type of crime and the age of the victim.

References

1.
Pretty
IA
,
Sweet
D
.
Anatomical location of bitemarks and associated findings in 101 cases from the United States
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198 2000:45;
(
4
):
812
4
.
2.
Vale
GL
,
Noguchi
TT
.
Anatomical distribution of human bite marks in a series of 67 cases
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1983
;
28
(
1
):
61
9
.
3.
Spiers
RF
.
Prevention of human bite infections
.
Surg Gynecol Obstet
1941
;
72
(
3
):
619
21
.
4.
Harvey
W
.
Dental identification and forensic odontology
.
London
:
Henry Kimpton
,
1976
;
91
2
.
5.
Baker
MD
,
Moore
SE
.
Human bites in children
.
A six-year experience
.
AM J Dis Child
 0002-922X
1987
;
141
(
12
):
1285
90
.
6.
Lowry TMcG
.
The surgical treatment of human bites
.
Ann Surg
 0003-4932
1936
;
104
(
6
):
1103
6
.
7.
Sweet
D
,
Lorente
JA
,
Valenzuela
A
,
Lorente
M
,
Villanueva
E
.
PCR-based DNA typing of saliva stains recovered from human skin
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1997
;
42
(
3
):
447
51
.
8.
Webb
DA
,
Sweet
D
,
Hinman
DL
,
Pretty
IA
.
Forensic implications of biting behavior: a conceptually underdeveloped area of investigation
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2002
;
47
(
1
):
103
6
.
9.
Marr
JS
,
Beck
AM
,
Lugo
JA
 jr.
An epidemiological study of the human bite
.
Public Health Rep
 0094-6214
1979
;
94
(
6
):
514
21
.
10.
Rawson
RD
,
Koot
A
,
Martin
C
,
Jackson
J
.
Novosel
S
.
Richardson
A
.
Bender
T
.
Incidence of bite marks in a selected juvenile population:A preliminary report
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1984
;
29
(
1
): 254–9.
11.
Dorion
R
.
Bitemark evidence
.
New York
:
Marcel Dekker
,
2005
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.