Abstract

The authors report on their macro- and microscopy study of bone lesions made by a sharp force instrument (a single blade knife), and a sharp-blunt instrument classified as a chopping weapon (a hatchet). The aim of this work was to attempt to identify the instrument by analyzing the general class characteristics of the cuts. Each weapon was used on human bones. The results indicate that macroscopic analysis is more problematic. The microscopic analysis assessed that characteristics examined were effective in distinguishing sharp from sharp-blunt injury to the bone. The microscope facilitates analysis unachievable with macroscopic methods, some three-dimensional characteristics not visible to the naked eye being clearly defined with its use. Emphasis has been placed on the value of SEM as an anthropologist's tool in bone lesion injuries.

References

1.
Somogyi
E
,
Soótonyi
P
.
On the possibilities of application of scanning electron microscopy in the forensic medicine
.
Z Rechtsmed
 0044-3433
1977
;
80
:
205
19
.
2.
Rawson
R B
,
Starich
G H
,
Rawson
R D
.
Scanning electron microscopic analysis of skin resolution as an aid in identifying trauma in forensic investigations
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2000
;
45
(
5
):
1023
7
.
3.
Katterwe
H
,
Goebel
R
,
Grooss
K D
.
The comparison scanning electron microscope within the field of forensic science
.
Scan Electron Microsc
 0586-5581
1982
;
2
:
499
504
.
4.
Tucker
B K
,
Hutchinson
D L
,
Gilliland
MF M
,
Charles
T M
,
Daniel
H J
,
Wolfe
L D
.
Microscopic Characteristics of hacking trauma
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2001
;
46
(
2
):
234
40
.
5.
Jakobsen
J
,
Holmen
L
,
Fredebo
L
,
Sejrsen
B
.
Scanning electron microscopy, a useful tool in forensic dental work
.
J Forensic Odontostomatol
 0258-414X
1995
;
13
(
2
):
36
40
.
6.
Teaford
M F
.
Scanning electron microscope diagnosis of wear patterns versus artefacts on fossil teeth
.
Scanning Microsc
 0891-7035
1988
;
2
(
2
):
1176
5
.
7.
Maas
M C
.
A scanning electron microscopic study of in vitro flake of mammalian tooth enamel under compressive loads
.
Arch Oral Biol
 0003-9969
1994
;
39
(
1
):
1
11
.
8.
Quatrehomme
G
,
Bolla
M
,
Muller
M
,
Rocca
J P
,
Grevin
G
,
Bailet
P
,
Ollier
A
.
Experimental single controlled study of burned bones : contribution of scanning electron microscopy
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1998
;
43
(
2
):
417
22
.
9.
Muller
M
,
Bertrand
M F
,
Quatrehomme
G
,
Bolla
M
,
Rocca
J P
.
Macroscopic and microscopic aspects of incinerated teeth
.
J Forensic Odontostomatol
 0258-414X
1998
;
6
,16(
1
):
1
7
.
10.
Burd
D Q
,
Gilmore
A E
.
Individual and class characteristics of tools
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1968
;
13
:
390
6
.
11.
Humphrey
J H
,
Hutchinson
L H
.
Macroscopic characteristics of hacking trauma
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
2001
;
46
(
2
):
228
33
.
12.
Davis
J E
.
Striated tool marks
. In:
Thomas
C C
, editor.
An introduction to tool marks, firearms and the striagraph
.
Springfield Illinois USA
,
1958
;
26
68
.
13.
Reichs
K J
.
Postmortem dismemberment : recovery, analysis and interpretation
. In:
Reichs
K J
, editor.
Forensic osteology: advances in the identification of human remains
, Second Edition.
Springfield
:
Charles C. Thomas
,
1998
;
353
88
.
14.
Symes
S A
,
Berryman
H E
,
Smith
O C
.
Saw marks in bone: introduction and examination of residual kerf contour
. In:
Reichs
K J
, editor.
Forensic osteology: advances in the identification of human remains
, Second Edition.
Springfield
:
Charles C. Thomas
,
1998
;
389
409
.
15.
Rao
V J
,
Hart
R H
.
Tool mark in cartilage of stabbing victim
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1983
;
28
(
3
):
794
9
.
16.
Maples
W R
.
Trauma analysis by the forensic anthropologist
. In:
Reichs
K J
, editor.
Forensic osteology: advances in the identification of human remains
.
Springfield
:
Charles C. Thomas
,
1986
;
218
28
.
17.
Wenham
S J
.
Anatomical interpretation of Anglo-Saxon weapon injuries
. In:
Hawkes
S J
, editor.
Weapons and warfare in Anglo Saxon England
. Oxford Univ Committee Archaeol Monogr,
1990
;21:123–39.
18.
Houck
M M
.
Skeletal trauma and the individualization of knife marks in bone
. In:
Reichs
K J
, editor.
Forensic osteology: advances in the identification of human remains
, Second Edition.
Springfield
:
Charles C. Thomas
,
1998
;
410
24
.
19.
Burd
D Q
,
R S
Greene
.
Tool mark examination techniques
.
J Forensic Sci
 0022-1198
1957
;
2
:
297
310
.
20.
Bromage
T G
,
Boyde
A
.
Microscopic criteria for the determination of directionality of cutmarks on bone
.
Am J Phys Anthropol
 0002-9483
1984
;
65
:
359
66
.
21.
Stirland
A
.
Patterns of trauma in a unique medieval parish cemetery
.
Int J Osteoarchaeol
1996
;
6
:
92
100
.
22.
Shipman
P
,
Rose
J
.
Early hominid hunting, butchering and carcassprocessing behaviors: approaches to the fossil record
.
J Anthropol Archaeol
 0002-9165
1983
;
2
:
57
98
.
23.
Nokes
L D
,
Green
M
.
The use of scanning electron microscopy in the dating of skeletal remains
.
J Forensic Sci Soc
 0015-7368
1987
;
27
(
6
):
413
6
.
24.
Wakely
J
,
Bruce
M F
.
Interpreting signs of trauma on a human axis vertebra
.
J Anat
 0021-8782
1989
;
167
:265.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.