Abstract

Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) are used as qualitative indicators of impairment by alcohol in individuals suspected of DUI. Stuster and Burns authored a report on this testing and presented the SFSTs as being 91% accurate in predicting Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) as lying at or above 0.08%. Their conclusions regarding accuracy are heavily weighted by the large number of subjects with very high BAC levels. This present study re-analyzes the original data with a more complete statistical evaluation. Our evaluation indicates that the accuracy of the SFSTs depends on the BAC level and is much poorer than that indicated by Stuster and Burns. While the SFSTs may be usable for evaluating suspects for BAC, the means of evaluation must be significantly modified to represent the large degree of variability of BAC in relation to SFST test scores. The tests are likely to be mainly useful in identifying subjects with a BAC substantially greater than 0.08%. Given the moderate to high correlation of the tests with BAC, there is potential for improved application of the test after further development, including a more diverse sample of BAC levels, adjustment of the scoring system and a statistically-based method for using the SFST to predict a BAC greater than 0.08%.

References

1.
Stuster
J
,
Burns
M
.
Validation of the standardized field sobriety test battery at BACs below 0.10 percent
. August, 1998.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
.
2.
Burns
M
,
Moskowitz
H
.
Psychophysical tests for DWI arrest
. Technical Report DOT-HS-5-01242.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
. Washington, DC.
3.
Tharp
V
,
Burns
M
,
Moskowitz
H
.
Development and field test of psychophysical tests for DWI arrest
.
US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Final Report DOT-HS-805-864, Washington, DC.
4.
McKnight
,
A J
,
Langston
,
E A
,
McKnight
A S
,
Lange
,
J E
.
Sobriety tests for low blood alcohol concentrations
.
Acc Anal & Prevent
2002
;
34
:
305
11
.
5.
Heishman
,
S J
,
Singleton
,
E G
,
Crouch
,
D J
.
Laboratory validation study of drug evaluation and classification program: ethanol, cocaine, and marijuana
.
J Anal Toxicol
 0146-4760
1996
;
20
:
468
81
.
6.
ole
S
,
Nowaczyk
,
R H
.
Field sobriety tests: Are they designed for failure?
Perceptual and Motor Skills
 0031-5125
1994
;
79
:
99
104
.
7.
Hlastala
M
.
The alcohol breath test—A brief review
.
J Appl Physiol
 8750-7587 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.368080
1998
;
84
:
401
8
.
8.
Hlastala
M
.
Invited editorial on “The alcohol breath test
.”
J Appl Physiol
 8750-7587
2002
;
93
:
405
6
.
9.
Price
P
,
Cole
S
.
NHTSA field sobriety tests validation v. invalidation
,
25 The Champion
.
2001
;
25
:
37
42
.
10.
Fisher
L D
,
van Belle
G
.
Biostatistics
.
Wiley
,
1993
.
11.
Weisberg
S
.
Applied linear regression
, 2nd edition.
Wiley
,
1985
.
12.
NHTSA DWI Detection and Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Student Manual
, DOT-HS-178-R1/02.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.