Abstract

Visual comparison of conventional antemortem and postmortem dental radiographs is often included in forensic identification. Ten forensic cases employing dry mandibular and maxillary bones and a dry study skull were exposed using the CDR digital dental X-ray system developed by Schick Technologies, Inc. Exposures of 0.08 s at 10 mA and 70 kVp were taken with an INTREX intraoral dental X-ray unit. Digital radiography has the ability to produce an image instantaneously, allowing an operator to retake an incorrectly aligned radiograph almost immediately. It gives the forensic scientist a simplified method for reproducing antemortem radiographic position more efficiently and often with greater accuracy than conventional radiography.

References

1.
Devore
D
.
Radiology and photography in forensic dentistry
.
Dent Clin N Amer
1977
;
21
:
69
-
83
.
2.
Mertz
C
.
Dental identification
.
Dent Clin N Amer
1977
;
21
:
47
-
67
.
3.
Sainio
P
,
Syrjanen
S M
,
Komakow
S
.
Positive identification of victims by comparison of ante-mortem and post-mortem dental radiographs
.
J Forensic Odonto-Stomatol
1990
;
8
:
11
-
6
.
4.
Anderson
L
,
Wenzel
A
.
Individual identification by means of conventional bitewing film and subtraction radiography
.
Forensic Sci Int
1995
;
72
(
1
):
55
-
64
.
5.
Borrman
H
,
Grondahl
H
.
Accuracy in establishing identity by means of intraoral radiographs
.
J Forensic Odonto-Stomatol
1990
;
8
:
31
-
6
.
6.
Bernstein
M
.
The identification of John Doe
.
J Amer Dent Assoc
1985
;
110
:
918
-
21
.
7.
Goldstein
M
,
Sweet
D J
,
Wood
R E
.
A specimen positioning device for dental radiographic identification-image geometry considerations
.
J Forensic Sci
1998
;
43
(
1
):
185
-
9
.
8.
Reis
,
T
.
Dental radiology equipment and procedures in general and specialized practices: survey report
.
Dental Products Report
1997; Oct:
17
-
22
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.