Abstract

While this paper is being written by a scientist in a specific disciplinary area, the comments to be made undoubtedly transcend that discipline and extend into other fields. As a matter of fact, nearly all of the points reviewed also have been articulated at one time or another by individuals from other areas of expertise. Hence, this effort is based as much on a kind of collective discomfort among expert witnesses as it is on the personal opinions of the author. In any case, the focus is on the problems of the expert witness in general rather than simply upon those difficulties uniquely experienced by a particular specialist. Five problems are addressed. They involve (1) the somewhat checkered legacy imposed upon the modern expert by his or her early counterparts, (2) the lack of specific forensic training for experts within their content disciplines, (3) the widely varying qualifications and professional training of current experts, (4) the pressures experienced by the expert, and (5) the conflicts of interest imposed upon them by the judicial system. Each of these problems presently affect expert witnesses; attempts to resolve or mitigate them would appear appropriate.

References

1.
Cederbaums
,
J. G.
and
Arnold
,
S.
,
Scientific and Expert Evidence in Criminal Advocacy
,
Practicing Law Institute
,
New York, NY
,
1975
.
2.
Fallis
,
S. M.
, Jr.
, “
Confronting the Expert Witness—The Prosecution Perspective
,”
Scientific and Expert Evidence
,
E. J.
Imwinkelried
, Ed.,
Practicing Law Institute
,
New York, NY
,
1981
, pp.
75
-
86
.
3.
Higgins
,
K. M.
and
Selavka
,
C. M.
, “
Do Forensic Science Graduate Programs Fulfill the Needs of the Forensic Science Community?
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
33
, No.
4
,
07
1988
, pp.
1015
-
1021
.
4.
Imwinkelried
,
E. J.
, “
Evidence Law and Tactics for the Proponents of Scientific Evidence
,”
Scientific and Expert Evidence
,
E. J.
Imwinkelried
, Ed.,
Practicing Law Institute
,
New York, NY
,
1981
, pp.
33
-
74
.
5.
Jenner
,
J. R.
, “
Meeting Expert Testimony—The Defense Perspective
,”
Scientific and Expert Evidence
,
E. J.
Imwinkelried
, Ed.,
Practicing Law Institute
,
New York, NY
,
1981
, pp.
87
-
97
.
6.
Moenssens
,
A. A.
,
Moses
,
R. E.
, and
Inbau
,
F. E.
,
Scientific Evidence in Criminal Cases
,
The Fountain Press, Inc.
,
New York
,
1973
.
7.
Rosenthal
,
P.
, “
Nature of the Jury Response to the Expert Witness
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
28
, No.
2
,
04
1983
, pp.
528
-
531
.
8.
Gench
,
W. J.
, “
Trial Success Linked to Meeting Expert Witnesses' Expectations
,”
The Expert and The Law
,
M. J.
Gorman
, Ed.,
Lawrenceville, NJ
, Vol.
7
,
1987
, pp.
5
-
7
(reprinted from The National Law Journal).
9.
Hollien
,
H.
, “
Consultant or Expert Witness? A Serious Problem for Scientists
,” paper presented at the
39th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences
,
San Diego, CA
,
02
1987
.
10.
Siegel
,
J. A.
, “
The Appropriate Educational Background for Entry Level Forensic Sciences: A Survey of Practitioners
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
33
, No.
4
,
07
1988
, pp.
1065
-
1068
.
11.
Buckout
,
R.
, “
Nobody Likes a Smartass: Expert Testimony by Psychologists
,”
Social Action and The Law
, Vol.
3
,
1976
, pp.
41
-
53
.
12.
Hollien
,
H.
, “
Problems of Ethics
”, paper presented at the
Symposium on the Use of the Language Scientist as Expert in the Legal Setting
,
New York Academy of Sciences
,
New York, NY
,
04
1988
.
13.
Howard
,
L. B.
, “
The Dichotomy of the Expert Witness
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
31
, No.
1
,
01
1986
, pp.
337
-
341
.
14.
Imwinkelried
,
E. J.
, “
Science Takes the Stand: The Growing Misuse of Expert Testimony
,”
The Sciences
, Nov./Dec. 1986, pp.
20
-
24
.
15.
Schroeder
,
O. C.
, “
Ethical and Moral Dilemmas Confronting Forensic Scientists
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
29
, No.
4
,
10
1984
, pp.
966
-
986
.
16.
Ahearne
,
J. F.
, “
Addressing Public Concerns in Science
,”
Physics Today
 0031-9228, Vol.
41
,
1988
, pp.
36
-
42
.
17.
Virginia Tech Foundation v. Family Group Limited
,
U.S. District Court, Western District of Virginia
, opinion by Hon. Jackson L. Kiser,
18
03
1987
.
18.
Undeutch
,
U.
, “
Statement Reality Analysis
”, in
Reconstructing The Past
,
A.
Trankell
, Ed.,
Kluver, Law and Taxation Publishers
,
Deventer, The Netherlands
,
1982
.
19.
Holden
C.
, “
Science in Court
,”
Science
 1095-9203, Vol.
243
,
1989
, pp.
1658
-
1659
.
20.
Renshaw
,
B.
and
Kaplan
,
C.
,
Computer Crime: Expert Witness Manual
,
Department of Justice
,
Washington, DC
,
1980
.
21.
Liebenson
,
H. A.
and
Wepman
,
J. M.
,
The Psychologist as a Witness
,
Callaghan and Co.
,
Mundelein, IL
,
1964
.
22.
Kates
,
J. H.
and
Guttenplan
,
H. L.
, “
Ethical Considerations in Forensic Science Services
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
28
, No.
4
,
10
1983
, pp.
972
-
976
.
23.
Phillips
,
K. A.
, “
The Nuts and Bolts of Testifying as a Forensic Scientist
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
22
, No.
2
,
04
1977
, pp.
457
-
463
.
24.
Peterson
,
J. L.
, “
Teaching Ethics in a Forensic Sciences Curriculum
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
33
, No.
4
,
07
1988
, pp.
1081
-
1085
.
25.
Smith
,
F. P.
,
Liu
,
R. H.
, and
Lindquist
,
C. A.
, “
Research Experience and Future Criminalists
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
33
, No.
4
,
07
1988
, pp.
1074
-
1080
.
26.
Cantor
,
B. J.
, “
Tips for the Expert Witness
,”
The Expert and the Law
,
M. J.
Gorman
, Ed.,
Lawrenceville, NJ
, Vol.
6
,
1986
, pp.
5
-
6
.
27.
Dean
,
D. J.
, “
The Presentation of Recorded Evidence
,”
Proceedings, Conference on Police Applications of Speech and Tape Recording Analysis
,
Institute of Acoustics
,
London, England
, pp.
49
-
55
.
28.
Miller
,
T. H.
, “
Nonverbal Communication in Expert Testimony
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
28
, No.
2
,
04
1983
, pp.
523
-
527
.
29.
Tanton
,
R. L.
, “
Jury Preconceptions and Their Effect on Expert Scientific Testimony
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
24
, No.
3
,
07
1979
, pp.
681
-
691
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.