Abstract

The prevalence of ethical problems in the forensic sciences is difficult to discover because of the limited sources of this information. A clear understanding of ethical violations is essential to establish the extent to which justice is hindered by unethical conduct among forensic scientists and then to improve the ethical state of the profession by addressing these specific problems. Seven major classes of evidence of ethical conduct and examples of each are examined: proficiency testing studies, self-report surveys and focus groups, complaints to forensic science associations, court cases, content analysis of ethical codes, anecdotal data (news reports, the professional literature, and case studies), and circumstantial evidence. Three main categories of ethical problems emerged from the data: problems of competency, individual misbehavior, and problems of practicing science in an adversary system. There is a need for more studies and various data collections to improve understanding of ethical problems in the forensic sciences and to seek to ameliorate them.

References

1.
Lucas
,
D. M.
, “
The Ethical Responsibilities of the Forensic Scientist: Exploring the Limits
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
34
, No.
3
,
05
1989
, pp.
719
-
729
.
2.
Giannelli
,
P. C.
, “
Evidentiary and Procedural Rules Governing Expert Testimony
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
34
, No.
3
,
05
1989
, pp.
730
-
748
.
3.
Frankel
,
M. S.
, “
Ethics and the Forensic Sciences: Professional Autonomy in the Criminal Justice System
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
34
, No.
3
,
05
1989
, pp.
763
-
771
.
4.
Yaremko
,
R. M.
,
Harari
,
H.
,
Harrison
,
R. C.
, and
Lynn
,
E.
,
Reference Handbook of Research and Statistical Methods
,
Harper & Row
,
New York
,
1982
.
5.
Krupp
,
M. A.
,
Sweet
,
N. J.
,
Jawetz
,
E.
,
Biglieri
,
E. G.
,
Rose
,
R. L.
, and
Camargo
,
C. A.
,
Physician's Handbook
, 19th ed.,
Lange Medical Publications
,
Los Altos, CA
,
1979
.
6.
Peterson
,
J. L.
,
Fabricant
,
E.
,
Field
,
K.
, and
Thornton
,
J.
,
Crime Laboratory Proficiency Testing Research Program
,
Government Printing Office
,
Washington, DC
,
1978
.
7.
Lucas
,
D. M.
,
Leete
,
C. G.
, and
Field
,
K. S.
, “
An American Proficiency Testing Program
,”
Forensic Sciences International
, Vol.
27
,
1985
, pp.
71
-
79
.
8.
Peat
,
M. A.
,
Finnigan
,
J. S.
, and
Finkle
,
B. S.
, “
Proficiency Testing in Forensic Toxicology: A Feasibility Study
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
28
, No.
1
,
01
1983
, pp.
139
-
158
.
9.
Guerrant
,
G. O.
and
Hall
,
C. T.
, “
Drug Abuse Proficiency Testing
,”
Clinical Toxicology
 0009-9309, Vol.
10
, No.
2
,
1977
, pp.
209
-
219
.
10.
Hansen
,
H. J.
,
Caudill
,
S. P.
, and
Boone
,
J.
, “
Crisis in Drug Testing: Results of CDC Blind Study
,”
JAMA
, Vol.
253
, No.
16
,
1985
, pp.
2382
-
2387
.
11.
Saks
,
M. J.
and
Van Duizend
,
R.
,
The Use of Scientific Evidence in Litigation
,
National Center for State Courts
,
Williamsburg, VA
,
1983
.
12.
Schroeder
,
O.
, “
Ethical and Moral Dimensions in Forensic Science
,”
Forensic Science
, 2nd ed.,
G.
Davies
, Ed.,
American Chemical Society
,
Washington, DC
,
1986
.
13.
Saks
,
M. J.
, “
Expert Testimony Before the Bench
,”
Technology Review
 0040-1692, Vol.
90
, No.
6
,
1987
, pp.
42
-
49
.
14.
Kalven
,
H.
and
Zeisel
,
H.
,
The American Jury
,
Little
,
Brown, Boston
,
1966
.
15.
Saks
,
M. J.
and
Wissler
,
R. L.
, “
Legal and Psychological Bases of Expert Testimony
,”
Behavioral Sciences and the Law
, Vol.
2
,
1984
, pp.
435
-
449
.
16.
Peterson
,
J. K.
, “
Ethical Issues in the Collection, Examination, and Use of Physical Evidence
,”
Forensic Science
, 2nd ed.,
G.
Davies
, Ed.,
American Chemical Society
,
Washington, DC
,
1986
.
17.
Note, “
Civil Remedies for Perjury: A Proposal for a Tort Action
,”
Arizona Law Review
, Vol.
19
,
1977
, pp.
349
-
376
.
18.
Starrs
,
J. E.
, “
Mountebanks Among Forensic Scientists
,”
Forensic Science Handbook
, Vol.
2
,
R.
Saferstein
, Ed.,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
,
1987
.
19.
Maier
,
T. J.
, “
Records Show Expert Misstated Credentials
,”
Newsday
 0278-5587,
10
12
1986
, p. 19.
20.
Valentine
,
P. W.
, “
Director of Md. Police Lab Probed: Credentials as Witness at Two N.Y. Trials Are Questioned
,”
Washington Post
,
20
12
1986
, Section B, p. 3.
21.
Maier
,
T. J.
and
Smith
,
R.
, “
Cases Falter on Trail of Errors From Murder Site to Crime Lab
,”
Newsday
 0278-5587,
10
12
1986
, p. 19.
22.
Frisbie
,
T.
, “
‘Expert’ Witnesses are on Trial
,”
Chicago Sun-Times
,
08
03
1987
, pp. 3, 50.
23.
Testimony of Medical Experts is Challenged as Beyond Their Competence
,”
Scientific Sleuthing Newsletter
, Vol.
7
,
10
1983
, p. 1.
24.
Pathologist's Testimony on Bullet Caliber is not Outside of Expertise
,” Case 2094,
Scientific Sleuthing Newsletter
, Vol.
7
,
07
1983
, p. 5.
25.
Applebome
,
P.
, “
As Influence of Police Laboratories Grows, So Does Call for High Standards
,”
New York Times
,
22
12
1987
, p. 20.
26.
Monahan
,
J.
and
Wexler
,
D.
, “
A Definite Maybe: Proof and Probability in Civil Commitment
,”
Law and Human Behavior
 0147-7307, Vol.
2
,
1978
, pp.
37
-
42
.
27.
Biskupic
,
J.
, “
Scientists ‘Too Cautious’: OC [Oklahoma County] DA Defends Courtroom Zeal for ‘My County’
,”
Tulsa Tribune
,
22
10
1987
, p. 1A.
28.
Biskupic
,
J.
, “
Under Fire: OC Police Scientist, Tests
,”
Tulsa Tribune
,
20
10
1987
, p. 1A.
29.
Ward
,
M.
, “
Judge Voids Conviction; Cites Error in Blood Tests
,”
Milwaukee Journal
,
03
03
1987
, p. 1A.
30.
Imbler v. Pachtman. United States Law Week
, Vol.
44
,
02
03
1976
, p. 450.
31.
Starrs
,
J. E.
, “
To Err is Human: Infallibility is Divine: Misidentified Fingerprint Results in Reversal of Minnesota First-Degree Murder Conviction
,” Case 2020,
Scientific Sleuthing Newsletter
, Vol.
7
,
01
1983
, p. 1.
32.
Evidence Under Scrutiny
” series,
Tulsa Tribune
, 19–22 Oct. 1987.
33.
Kleinfield
,
N. R.
, “
The Whistle Blowers' Morning After: The Price of ‘Doing Right’ Can Be the End of a Career, Scorn and Years of Debt
,”
New York Times
,
09
11
1986
, p. 1.
34.
Perplexing Problems in Engineering Ethics
,”
Chemical Engineering
,
05
05
1980
.
35.
Fabricated Fingerprint
,” Case 2128,
Scientific Sleuthing Newsletter
, Vol.
7
,
10
1983
, p. 1.
36.
Dunleavy
,
P. J.
, “
Fabricated Identification Detected
,”
Fingerprint Whorld
, Vol.
8
,
1983
, p. 104.
37.
Expert Witnesses: Booming Business for the Specialists
,”
New York Times
,
05
07
1987
, Sec. 1, Part 1, p. 1.
38.
Peterson
,
J.
,
Mihajlovic
,
S.
, and
Bedrosian
,
J.
, “
The Capabilities, Uses, and Effects of the Nation's Criminalistics Laboratories
,”
Journal of Forensic Sciences
 0022-1198, Vol.
30
, No.
1
,
01
1985
, pp.
10
-
23
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.