Abstract
This article reviews rules and codes adopted by operating agencies and professional societies which regulate the professional conduct of forensic scientists. The purpose, origin, and content of these codes are examined, with particular emphasis on their ability to address the major ethics-related problems confronting the field. The recently adopted ethics and management guidelines of the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors are discussed as a major new policy having the potential of ensuring that benchworkers, managers, supervisors, and parent agency executives all subscribe to a common and comprehensive set of ethical standards.
Issue Section:
Research Papers
References
1.
Starrs
, J. E.
, “Mountebanks Among Forensic Scientists
,” in Forensic Science Handbook, Volume II
, R.
Saferstein
, Ed., Prentice-Hall
, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
, 1987
.2.
Applebome
, P.
, “As Influence of Police Laboratories Grows, So Does Call for High Standards
,” New York Times
, 22
12
1987
.3.
Giannelli
, P. C.
, “Evidentiary and Procedural Rules Governing Expert Testimony
,” Journal of Forensic Sciences
0022-1198, Vol. 34
, No. 3
, 05
1989
, pp. 730
-748
.4.
Moenssens
, A.
, Inbau
, F.
, and Starrs
, J.
, Scientific Evidence in Criminal Cases
, 3rd ed., The Foundation Press, Inc.
, Mineola, NY
, 1986
.5.
Peterson
, J. L.
, Ryan
, J. P.
, Houlden
, P. J.
, and Mihajlovic
, S.
, “The Uses and Effects of Forensic Science in the Adjudication of Felony Cases
,” Journal of Forensic Sciences
0022-1198, Vol. 32
, No. 6
, 11
1987
, pp. 1730
-1753
.6.
Saks
, M. J.
, “Prevalence and Impact of Ethical Problems in Forensic Sciences
,” Journal of Forensic Sciences
0022-1198, Vol. 34
, No. 3
, 05
1989
, pp. 772
-793
.7.
Lucas
, D. M.
, Leete
, C. G.
, and Field
, K. S.
, “An American Proficiency Testing Program
,” Forensic Science International
0379-0738, Vol. 27
, No. 2
, 1985
, pp. 71
-79
.8.
American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors
, Laboratory Accreditation Board Accreditation Manual
, 02
1985
, p. 5.9.
Parsons
, T.
, “The Professions and Social Structure
,” Social Forces
0037-7732, Vol. 17
, 05
1939
, pp. 457
-467
.10.
American Academy of Forensic Sciences
, Code of Ethics and Conduct
, Article II, AAFS Bylaws (amended 12 Feb. 1986).11.
Saks
, M. J.
and Van Duizend
, R.
, The Use of Scientific Evidence in Litigation
, National Center for State Courts
, Williamsburg, VA
, 1983
.12.
Code of Ethics (revised 17 May 1985) and Enforcement of Code of Ethics (revised 16 Aug. 1985), California Association of Criminalists.
13.
“
ASCLD Guidelines for Forensic Laboratory Management Practices
,” Crime Laboratory Digest
, Vol. 14
, No. 2
, 04
1987
, pp. 39
-46
.14.
Ethical Guidelines
, accepted by the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors' membership at its annual business meeting, 10
09
1987
, Emmitsburg, MD.15.
Frankel
, M. S.
, “Ethics and the Forensic Sciences: Professional Autonomy in the Criminal Justice System
,” Journal of Forensic Sciences
0022-1198, Vol. 34
, No. 3
, 05
1989
, pp. 763
-771
.16.
Lucas
, D. M.
, “The Ethical Responsibilities of the Forensic Scientist: Exploring the Limits
,” Journal of Forensic Sciences
0022-1198, Vol. 34
, No. 3
, 05
1989
, pp. 719
-729
.17.
Contra Costa County Personnel Management Regulations; State of California Government Code 1988, Section 19572; U.S. Department of Justice Standard Schedule of Disciplinary Offenses and Penalties, Appendix 2735A, 82-3 personnel manual, 8-3-82.
This content is only available via PDF.
All rights reserved. This material may not be reproduced or copied, in whole or in part, in any printed, mechanical, electronic, film, or other distribution and storage media, without the written consent of ASTM International.
You do not currently have access to this content.