Abstract

Psychiatrists, as a profession, have always asserted the central importance of confidentiality. The American Psychiatric Association (APA), in its recently released “Guidelines on Confidentiality,” reaffirms this position. In an age of progressive erosion of the traditional psychiatrist-patient confidentiality, the threat to confidentiality is invariably perceived as exogenous, emanating from external sources such as the legal system, third-party payers, and peer review organizations. In rare instances, there appears to be a threat from within, when the psychiatrist (or nonpsychiatrist physician dealing with a psychiatric patient) deliberately chooses to divulge the patient's confidential communications in the absence of any clearcut legal requirement to do so (and against the express wishes of the patient). Four case examples of these unusual breaches of confidentiality are presented. The author concludes that although significant assaults on patient confidentiality are occurring from without, it is quite rare for such violations to come from within the profession itself.

References

1.
Karasu
,
T.
, “
Ethical Aspects of Psychotherapy
,”
Psychiatric Ethics
,
S.
Bloch
and
P.
Chodoff
, Eds.,
Oxford University Press
,
Oxford
,
1981
.
2.
The Principles of Medical Ethics with Annotations Especially Applicable to Psychiatry
,”
American Journal of Psychiatry
 0002-953X, Vol.
130
, No.
9
,
09
1973
, pp.
1057
-
1064
.
3.
Guidelines on Confidentiality
,”
American Journal of Psychiatry
 0002-953X, Vol.
144
, No.
11
,
11
1987
, pp.
1522
-
1526
.
4.
Gurevittz
,
H.
, “
Tarasoff: Protective Privilege versus Public Peril
,”
American Journal of Psychiatry
 0002-953X, Vol.
134
, No.
3
,
03
1977
, pp.
289
-
292
.
5.
Stone
,
A. A.
, “
The Tarasoff Decisions: Suing Psychiatrists to Safeguard Society
,”
Harvard Law Review
 0017-811X, Vol.
90
,
1976
, pp.
358
-
378
.
6.
Noll
,
J. O.
, “
The Psychotherapist and Informed Consent
,”
American Journal of Psychiatry
 0002-953X, Vol.
133
, No.
12
,
12
1976
, pp.
1451
-
1453
.
7.
Whalen v. Roe, 97 S. Ct. 869 (
1977
).
8.
Plaut
,
E. A.
, “
A Perspective on Confidentiality
,”
American Journal of Psychiatry
 0002-953X, Vol.
131
, No.
9
,
09
1974
, pp.
1021
-
1024
.
9.
Dubey
,
J.
, “
Confidentiality as a Requirement of the Therapist: Technical Necessities for Absolute Privilege in Psychotherapy
,”
American Journal of Psychiatry
 0002-953X, Vol.
131
, No.
10
,
10
1974
, pp.
1093
-
1096
.
10.
Rachlin
,
S.
and
Appelbaum
,
P. S.
, “
The Limits of Confidentiality
,”
Hospital and Community Psychiatry
 0022-1597, Vol.
34
, No.
7
,
07
1983
, pp.
589
-
590
.
11.
Doe v. Roe, 400 N.Y.S.2d 668, 676, 677 (
1977
).
12.
MacDonald v. Clinger, 446 N.Y.S.2d 801, 805 (
1982
).
13.
Clark v. Geraci, 208 N.Y.S.2d 564 (
1960
).
14.
Fedell v. Wierzbieniec, 485 N.Y.S.2d 460 (
1985
).
15.
Model Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal),
American Bar Association
,
1983
.
16.
Matter of Lifschutz, 467 P. 2d 557 (
1970
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.