The mechanical properties of 316 stainless steel were measured at room temperature and at 1200 F during exposure to environments of air, helium and “clean” sodium. The test results were: Test: Cyclic strain / Environment: Air - Least cycles to failure; Environment: Helium - Most cycles to failure; Environment: Sodium - Between air and helium values. Test: Rupture / Environment: Air/Helium - No significant difference in rupture strenth; Environment: Sodium - Possible increase in ductility compared to air. Test: Creep / Environment: Air - Lowest rate; Environment: Helium - Highest rate; Environment: Sodium - Between air and helium values. Test: Tensile / Environment: Air/Helium/Sodium - 5 percent or less difference in tensile strength; 6 percent or less difference in yield strength. The small changes seen in the rupture, creep, and tensile tests, due to different environments, are considered insignificant when compared to overall variations between heats of stainless steel. The differences seen in cyclic strain tests reflect changes in material surface condition produced by environment.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 1969
This article was originally published in
Journal of Basic Engineering
Research Papers
A Limited Comparison of the Mechanical Strength of Austenitic Steel in 1200 F Sodium, Air, and Helium
L. H. Kirschler,
L. H. Kirschler
MSA Research Corporation, Evans City, Pa.
Search for other works by this author on:
R. C. Andrews
R. C. Andrews
MSA Research Corporation, Evans City, Pa.
Search for other works by this author on:
L. H. Kirschler
MSA Research Corporation, Evans City, Pa.
R. C. Andrews
MSA Research Corporation, Evans City, Pa.
J. Basic Eng. Dec 1969, 91(4): 785-791 (7 pages)
Published Online: December 1, 1969
Article history
Received:
June 12, 1969
Online:
November 3, 2011
Citation
Kirschler, L. H., and Andrews, R. C. (December 1, 1969). "A Limited Comparison of the Mechanical Strength of Austenitic Steel in 1200 F Sodium, Air, and Helium." ASME. J. Basic Eng. December 1969; 91(4): 785–791. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3571222
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Mechanical Properties of Roll Extruded Nuclear Reactor Piping
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (May,1976)
An Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Mn-Mo and Mn-Mo-Ni Steels
J. Eng. Ind (February,1973)
Incubation Time and Cavitation Erosion Rate of Work-Hardening Materials
J. Fluids Eng (February,2009)
Critical Review and Appraisal of Traditional and New Procedures for the Quantification of Creep Fracture Behavior Using 1Cr–1Mo–0.25V Steel
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,2009)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction and Definitions
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design
Understanding the Problem
Design and Application of the Worm Gear
Section III: Subsections NC and ND — Class 2 and 3 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Fourth Edition