Abstract

An unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes model on body-fitted meshes in a commercial package (SimericsMP+) with a mismatched grid interface is used to study fluid dynamics around a ducted wind turbine. The model is validated by studying turbulent flow past a marine propeller. The nondimensional thrust and torque coefficients are compared against experimental data and results from a large eddy simulation model. Both coefficients are found to be within 3% of experimental results. Following this validation, the impact of different tip speed ratios on the ducted wind turbine's fluid dynamics is assessed. The optimal tip speed ratio is found to be the design value of 3.93 with a maximum power coefficient of 0.465 based on the duct exit area. The corresponding thrust coefficient is found to be 1.02 based on the rotor area. Lower tip speed ratios experience larger flow separation on the duct interior. Higher tip speed ratios decrease the size of the low-velocity region behind the hub. The ducted wind turbine's performance at design conditions is compared to an open rotor. The ducted wind turbine increases the power coefficient by 96% over the open rotor. The impact of hub size on the ducted wind turbine is also studied by simulating a smaller hub with 77% diameter. At the design tip speed ratio, the smaller hub has a power coefficient of 0.417. The maximum power coefficient is found to be 0.446 at a higher tip speed ratio of 4.5.

References

1.
Hoen
,
B. D.
,
Diffendorfer
,
J. E.
,
Rand
,
J. T.
,
Kramer
,
L. A.
,
Garrity
,
C. P.
, and
Hunt
,
H. E.
,
2018
, United States Wind Turbine Database, (v4.3, (January 14, 2022)),
U.S. Geological Survey, American Clean Power Association, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
data
release.10.5066/F7TX3DN0
2.
Wiser
,
R.
, et al.,
2021
,
Land-Based Wind Market Report
,
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
,
Berkeley, CA
.
3.
van Bussel
,
G. J. W.
,
2007
, “
The Science of Making More Torque From Wind: Diffuser Experiments and Theory Revisited
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
75
, p.
012010
.10.1088/1742-6596/75/1/012010
4.
Lilley
,
G.
, and
Rainbird
,
W.
,
1956
,
A Preliminary Report on the Design and Performance of Ducted Windmills
,
College of Aeronautics Cranfield
,
Cranfield, UK
, Report No. 102.
5.
Foreman
,
K. M.
,
Gilbert
,
B.
, and
Oman
,
R. A.
,
1978
, “
Diffusion Augmentation of Wind Turbines
,”
Sol. Energy
,
20
(
4
), pp.
305
311
.10.1016/0038-092X(78)90122-6
6.
Igra
,
O.
,
1981
, “
Research and Development for Shrouded Wind Turbines
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
21
(
1
), pp.
13
48
.10.1016/0196-8904(81)90005-4
7.
Phillips
,
D. G.
,
Richards
,
P. J.
, and
Flay
,
R.
,
2002
, “
CFD Modelling and the Development of the Diffuser Augmented Wind Turbine
,”
Wind Struct.
,
5
(
2_3_4
), pp.
267
276
.10.12989/was.2002.5.2_3_4.267
8.
Dighe
,
V. V.
,
Avallone
,
F.
, and
van Bussel
,
G. J. W.
,
2020
, “
Effects of Yawed Inflow on the Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Performance of Ducted Wind Turbines
,”
J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
201
, p.
104174
.10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104174
9.
Takahashi
,
S.
,
Hata
,
Y.
,
Ohya
,
Y.
,
Karasudani
,
T.
, and
Uchida
,
T.
,
2012
, “
Behavior of the Blade Tip Vortices of a Wind Turbine Equipped With a Brimmed-Diffuser Shroud
,”
Energies
,
5
(
12
), pp.
5229
5242
.10.3390/en5125229
10.
Visser
,
K.
,
2022
, “
Real-World Development Challenges of the Clarkson University 3 Meter Ducted Wind Turbine
,”
J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
,
2265
(
4
), p.
042072
.10.1088/1742-6596/2265/4/042072
11.
Bagheri-Sadeghi
,
N.
,
Helenbrook
,
B.
, and
Visser
,
K.
,
2018
, “
Ducted Wind Turbine Optimization and Sensitivity to Rotor Position
,”
Wind Energy Sci.
,
3
(
1
), pp.
221
229
.10.5194/wes-3-221-2018
12.
Ding
,
C.
,
Zhang
,
B.
,
Liang
,
C.
,
Visser
,
K.
, and
Yao
,
G
,
2022
, “
High-Order Large Eddy Simulations of a Wind Turbine in Ducted and Open-Rotor Configurations
,”
ASME. J. Fluids Eng.
,
145
(
2
), p.
021201
.10.1115/1.4055989
13.
Orszag
,
S. A.
,
Yakhot
,
V.
,
Flannery
,
W. S.
,
Boysan
,
F. E.
,
Choudhury
,
D.
,
Maruzewski
,
J.
, and
Patel
,
B.
,
1993
, “
Renormalization Group Modeling and Turbulence Simulations
,”
International Conference on Near-Wall Turbulent Flows
, Tempe, Az.
14.
Ding
,
H.
,
Visser
,
F. C.
,
Jiang
,
Y.
, and
Furmanczyk
,
M.
,
2009
, “
Demonstration and Validation of a 3D CFD Simulation Tool Predicting Pump Performance and Cavitation for Industrial Applications
,”
ASME. J. Fluids Eng.
, 133(1), p.
011101
.
15.
Zhang
,
B.
,
Ding
,
C.
, and
Liang
,
C.
, 30 June
2021
, “
High-Order Implicit Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow Over a Marine Propeller
,”
Comput. Fluids
,
224
, p.
104967
.10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.104967
16.
Jessup
,
S. D.
,
1989
, “
An Experimental Investigation of Viscous Aspects of Propeller Blade Flow
,” Ph.D. dissertation,
School of Engineering and Architecture, The Catholic University of America
,
Washington, DC
.
17.
Jessup
,
S. D.
,
Schott
,
C.
,
Jeffers
,
M.
, and
Kobayashi
,
S.
,
1984
, “
Local Propeller Blade Flows in Uniform and Sheared Onset Flows Using LDV Techniques
,”
Fifteenth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
,
Hamburg, Germany
, Sept., pp.
221
35
.
18.
Versteeg
,
H. K.
, and
Malalasekera
,
W.
,
2007
,
An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
,
Pearson Education
,
Edinburgh Gate, UK
, Chap. 3.7.
19.
Jamieson
,
P.
,
2008
, “
Generalized Limits for Energy Extraction in a Linear Constant Velocity Flow Field
,”
Wind Energy
,
11
(
5
), pp.
445
457
.10.1002/we.268
20.
Kanya
,
B.
, and
Visser
,
K. D.
,
2018
, “
Experimental Validation of a Ducted Wind Turbine Design Strategy
,”
Wind Energy Sci.
,
3
(
2
), pp.
919
928
.10.5194/wes-3-919-2018
21.
Reza
,
M. M. S.
,
Mahmood
,
S. A.
, and
Iqbal
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Performance Analysis and Comparison of High Lift Airfoil for Low Speed Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
,”
International Conference on Mechanical
,
Industrial and Energy Engineering
,
Khulna, Bangladesh
.10.5281/zenodo.1468120
You do not currently have access to this content.