We have studied the influence of a tangential blowing jet in dynamic stall of a NACA0012 airfoil at Reynolds number of 1 × 106, for active flow control (AFC) purposes. The airfoil was oscillating between angles of attack (AOA) of 5 and 25 deg about its quarter-chord with a sinusoidal motion. We have utilized computational fluid dynamics to investigate the impact of jet location and jet velocity ratio on the aerodynamic coefficients. We have placed the jet location upstream of the counter-clockwise (CCW) vortex which was formed during the upstroke motion near the leading-edge; we have also considered several other locations nearby to perform sensitivity analysis. Our results showed that placing the jet slot within a very small range upstream of the CCW vortex had tremendous effects on both lift and drag, such that maximum drag was reduced by 80%. There was another unique observation: placing the jet at separation point led to an inverse behavior of drag hysteresis curve in upstroke and downstroke motions. Drag in downstroke motion was significantly lower than upstroke motion, whereas in uncontrolled case the converse was true. Lift was significantly enhanced during both upstroke and downstroke motions. By investigating the pressure coefficients, it was found that flow control had altered the distribution of pressure over the airfoil upper surface. It caused a reduction in pressure difference between upper and lower surfaces in the rear part, while substantially increased pressure difference in the front part of the airfoil.

References

References
1.
Ham
,
N. D.
, and
Garelick
,
M. S.
,
1968
, “
Dynamic Stall Considerations in Helicopter Rotors
,”
J. Am. Helicopter Soc.
,
13
(
2
), pp.
49
55
.
2.
McCroskey
,
W.
,
Carr
,
L.
, and
McAlister
,
K.
,
1976
, “
Dynamic Stall Experiments on Oscillating Airfoils
,”
AIAA J.
,
14
(
1
), pp.
57
63
.
3.
McAlister
,
K.
,
Pucci
,
S.
,
McCroskey
,
W.
, and
Carr
,
L.
,
1982
, “
An Experimental Study of Dynamic Stall on Advanced Airfoil Section. Volume 2: Pressure and Force Data
,” NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, Technical Report No.
NASA TM-84245
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19830003778
4.
Lorber
,
P. F.
, and
Carta
,
F. O.
,
1988
, “
Airfoil Dynamic Stall at Constant Pitch Rate and High Reynolds Number
,”
J. Aircr.
,
25
(
6
), pp.
548
556
.
5.
Pruski
,
B. J.
, and
Bowersox
,
R.
,
2013
, “
Leading-Edge Flow Structure of a Dynamically Pitching NACA0012 Airfoil
,”
AIAA J.
,
51
(
5
), pp.
1042
1053
.
6.
Visbal
,
M. R.
, and
Shang
,
J.
,
1989
, “
Investigation of the Flow Structure Around a Rapidly Pitching Airfoil
,”
AIAA J.
,
27
(
8
), pp.
1044
1051
.
7.
Tuncer
,
I. H.
,
Wu
,
J. C.
, and
Wang
,
C.
,
1990
, “
Theoretical and Numerical Studies of Oscillating Airfoils
,”
AIAA J.
,
28
(
9
), pp.
1615
1624
.
8.
Ekaterinaris
,
J. A.
, and
Platzer
,
M. F.
,
1998
, “
Computational Prediction of Airfoil Dynamic Stall
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
33
(
11
), pp.
759
846
.
9.
Sheng
,
W.
,
Galbraith
,
R.
, and
Coton
,
F.
,
2008
, “
A Modified Dynamic Stall Model for Low Mach Numbers
,”
ASME J. Solar Energy Eng.
,
130
(
3
), p.
031013
.
10.
Martinat
,
G.
,
Braza
,
M.
,
Hoarau
,
Y.
, and
Harran
,
G.
,
2008
, “
Turbulence Modelling of the Flow Past a Pitching NACA0012 Airfoil at 105 and 106 Reynolds Numbers
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
24
(
8
), pp.
1294
1303
.
11.
Martinat
,
G.
,
Hoarau
,
Y.
,
Braza
,
M.
,
Vos
,
J.
, and
Harran
,
G.
,
2008
, “
Numerical Simulation of the Dynamic Stall of a NACA 0012 Airfoil Using DES and Advanced OES/URANS Modelling
,”
Advances in Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling
,
Springer
,
Berlin
, pp.
271
278
.
12.
Wang
,
S.
,
Ingham
,
D. B.
,
Ma
,
L.
,
Pourkashanian
,
M.
, and
Tao
,
Z.
,
2010
, “
Numerical Investigations on Dynamic Stall of Low Reynolds Number Flow Around Oscillating Airfoils
,”
Comput. Fluids
,
39
(
9
), pp.
1529
1541
.
13.
Wang
,
S.
,
Ingham
,
D. B.
,
Ma
,
L.
,
Pourkashanian
,
M.
, and
Tao
,
Z.
,
2012
, “
Turbulence Modeling of Deep Dynamic Stall at Relatively Low Reynolds Number
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
33
, pp.
191
209
.
14.
Gharali
,
K.
, and
Johnson
,
D. A.
,
2013
, “
Active Control of a Stalled Airfoil Through Steady or Unsteady Actuation Jets
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
42
, pp.
228
244
.
15.
Chapin
,
V.
, and
Bénard
,
E.
,
2015
, “
Active Control of a Stalled Airfoil Through Steady or Unsteady Actuation Jets
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
137
(
9
), p.
091103
.
16.
You
,
D.
, and
Bromby
,
W.
,
2012
, “
Large-Eddy Simulation of Unsteady Separation Over a Pitching Airfoil at High Reynolds Number
,”
Seventh International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD7)
, Big Island, HI, July 9–13, Paper No.
ICCFD7-4103
.http://www.iccfd.org/iccfd7/assets/pdf/papers/ICCFD7-4103_paper.pdf
17.
Rosti
,
M. E.
,
Omidyeganeh
,
M.
, and
Pinelli
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Direct Numerical Simulation of the Flow Around an Aerofoil in Ramp-up Motion
,”
Phys. Fluids
,
28
(
2
), p.
025106
.
18.
Balduzzi
,
F.
,
Drofelnik
,
J.
,
Bianchini
,
A.
,
Ferrara
,
G.
,
Ferrari
,
L.
, and
Campobasso
,
M. S.
,
2017
, “
Darrieus Wind Turbine Blade Unsteady Aerodynamics: A Three-Dmensional Navier-Stokes CFD Assessment
,”
Energy
,
128
, pp.
550
563
.
19.
Spalart
,
P. R.
, and
Venkatakrishnan
,
V.
,
2016
, “
On the Role and Challenges of CFD in the Aerospace Indutry
,”
Aeronaut. J.
,
120
(
1223
), pp.
209
232
.
20.
Asgari
,
E.
, and
Tadjfar
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Ssessment of Four Inflow Conditions on Large-Eddy Simulation of a Gently Curved Backward-Facing Step
,”
J. Turbul.
,
18
(
1
), pp.
61
86
.
21.
Krajnovic
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Large Eddy Simulation Exploration of Passive Flow Control Around an Ahmed Body
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
136
(
12
), p.
121103
.
22.
Khalighi
,
B.
,
Chen
,
K.-H.
, and
Iaccarino
,
G.
,
2012
, “
Unsteady Aerodynamic Flow Investigation Around a Simplified Square-Back Road Vehicle With Drag Reduction Devices
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
134
(
6
), p.
061101
.
23.
Tang
,
H.
,
Salunkhe
,
P.
,
Zheng
,
Y.
,
Du
,
J.
, and
Wu
,
Y.
,
2014
, “
On the Use of Synthetic Jet Actuator Arrays for Active Flow Separation Control
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
,
57
, pp.
1
10
.
24.
Sasson
,
B.
, and
Greenblatt
,
D.
,
2011
, “
Effect of Leading-Edge Slot Blowing on a Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
,”
AIAA J.
,
49
(
9
), pp.
1932
1942
.
25.
Müller-Vahl
,
H. F.
,
Strangfeld
,
C.
,
Nayeri
,
C. N.
,
Paschereit
,
C. O.
, and
Greenblatt
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Control of Thick Airfoil, Deep Dynamic Stall Using Steady Blowing
,”
AIAA J.
,
53
(
2
), pp.
277
295
.
26.
Müller-Vahl
,
H. F.
,
Nayeri
,
C. N.
,
Paschereit
,
C. O.
, and
Greenblatt
,
D.
,
2016
, “
Dynamic Stall Control Via Adaptive Blowing
,”
Renewable Energy
,
97
, pp.
47
64
.
27.
Monir
,
H. E.
,
Tadjfar
,
M.
, and
Bakhtian
,
A.
,
2014
, “
Tangential Synthetic Jets for Separation Control
,”
J. Fluids Struct.
,
45
, pp.
50
65
.
28.
Moulton
,
M. A.
,
Wong
,
T. C.
,
Smith
,
M. J.
,
Le Pape
,
A.
, and
Le Balleur
,
J. C.
,
2011
, “
The Role of Transition Modeling in CFD Predictions of Static and Dynamic Stall
,”
37th European Rotorcraft Forum
, Cascina Costa di Samarate, Italy, Sept. 13–15, pp.
1097
1108
.
29.
McCroskey
,
W.
,
McAlister
,
K.
,
Carr
,
L.
, and
Pucci
,
S.
,
1982
, “
An Experimental Study of Dynamic Stall on Advanced Airfoil Sections Volume 1. Summary of the Experiment
,” NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, Technical Report No.
NASA TM-84245
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19820024438
30.
Kasibhotla
,
V. R.
, and
Tafti
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Large Eddy Simulation of the Flow Past Pitching NACA0012 Airfoil at 1E5 Reynolds Number
,”
ASME
Paper No. FEDSM2014-21588.
31.
Rajasekharan
,
A.
, and
Farhat
,
C.
,
2009
, “
Applications of a Variational Multiscale Method for Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows on Moving/Deforming Unstructured Grids
,”
Finite Elem. Anal. Des.
,
45
(
4
), pp.
272
279
.
You do not currently have access to this content.