We report the first systematic investigation of the phenomenon of “switching” between the two bistable axial jet (AJ) and precessing jet (PJ) flow modes in the fluidic precessing jet (FPJ) nozzle. While geometric configurations have been identified where the fractional time spent in the AJ mode is much less than that in the PJ mode, nevertheless, the phenomenon is undesirable and also remains of fundamental interest. This work was undertaken numerically using the unsteady shear stress transport (SST) model, the validation of which showed a good agreement with the experimental results. Three methods were employed in the current work to trigger the flow to switch from the AJ to the PJ modes. It is found that some asymmetry in either the inlet flow or the initial flow field is necessary to trigger the mode switching, with the time required to switch being dependent on the extent of the asymmetry. The direction and frequency of the precession were found to depend on the direction and intensity of the imposed inlet swirling, which will be conducive to the control of the FPJ flow for related industrial applications and academic research. The process with which the vortex skeleton changes within the chamber is also reported. Furthermore, both the rate of spreading and the maximum axial velocity decay of the jet within the nozzle are found to increase gradually during the switching process from the AJ to the PJ modes, consistent with the increased curvature within the local jet.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2017
Research-Article
New Understanding of Mode Switching in the Fluidic Precessing Jet Flow
Xiao Chen,
Xiao Chen
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Zhao F. Tian,
Zhao F. Tian
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard M. Kelso,
Richard M. Kelso
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Graham J. Nathan
Graham J. Nathan
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
e-mail: graham.nathan@adelaide.edu.au
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
e-mail: graham.nathan@adelaide.edu.au
Search for other works by this author on:
Xiao Chen
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Zhao F. Tian
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Richard M. Kelso
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Graham J. Nathan
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
e-mail: graham.nathan@adelaide.edu.au
Centre for Energy Technology (CET),
The University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
e-mail: graham.nathan@adelaide.edu.au
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received August 15, 2016; final manuscript received February 1, 2017; published online April 24, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Kwang-Yong Kim.
J. Fluids Eng. Jul 2017, 139(7): 071102 (10 pages)
Published Online: April 24, 2017
Article history
Received:
August 15, 2016
Revised:
February 1, 2017
Citation
Chen, X., Tian, Z. F., Kelso, R. M., and Nathan, G. J. (April 24, 2017). "New Understanding of Mode Switching in the Fluidic Precessing Jet Flow." ASME. J. Fluids Eng. July 2017; 139(7): 071102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036151
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Unsteady Structure and Development of a Row of Impingement Jets, Including Kelvin–Helmholtz Vortex Development
J. Fluids Eng (May,2015)
Transition of a Steady to a Periodically Unsteady Flow for Various Jet Widths of a Combined Wall Jet and Offset Jet
J. Fluids Eng (July,2016)
Helical Flow Disturbances in a Multinozzle Combustor
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (September,2015)
Effects of Rotating Inlet Distortion on Compressor Stability With Stall Precursor-Suppressed Casing Treatment
J. Fluids Eng (November,2015)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Antilock-Braking System Using Fuzzy Logic
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Cavitating Structures at Inception in Turbulent Shear Flow
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
Dynamic Behavior of Pumping Systems
Pipeline Pumping and Compression Systems: A Practical Approach