Unlike the Navier boundary condition, this paper deals with the case when the slip of a fluid along the wall may occur only when the shear stress attains certain bound which is given a priori and does not depend on the solution itself. The mathematical model of the velocity–pressure formulation with this type of threshold slip boundary condition is given by the so-called variational inequality of the second kind. For its discretization, we use P1-bubble/P1 mixed finite elements. The resulting algebraic problem leads to the minimization of a nondifferentiable energy function subject to linear equality constraints representing the discrete impermeability and incompressibility condition. To release the former one and to regularize the nonsmooth term characterizing the stick–slip behavior of the algebraic formulation, two additional vectors of Lagrange multipliers are introduced. Further, the velocity vector is eliminated, and the resulting minimization problem for a quadratic function depending on the dual variables (the discrete pressure and the normal and shear stress) is solved by the interior point type method which is briefly described. To justify the threshold model and to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed approach, three physically realistic problems are solved and the results are compared with the ones solving the Stokes problem with the Navier boundary condition.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2017
Research-Article
Modeling of Hydrophobic Surfaces by the Stokes Problem With the Stick–Slip Boundary Conditions
R. Kučera,
R. Kučera
IT4Innovations,
VŠB-TU Ostrava,
17 listopadu 15/2172,
Ostrava-Poruba 708 33, Czech Republic
e-mail: radek.kucera@vsb.cz
VŠB-TU Ostrava,
17 listopadu 15/2172,
Ostrava-Poruba 708 33, Czech Republic
e-mail: radek.kucera@vsb.cz
Search for other works by this author on:
V. Šátek,
V. Šátek
IT4Innovations,
VŠB-TU Ostrava,
17 listopadu 15/2172,
Ostrava-Poruba 708 33, Czech Republic
e-mail: vaclav.satek@vsb.cz
VŠB-TU Ostrava,
17 listopadu 15/2172,
Ostrava-Poruba 708 33, Czech Republic
e-mail: vaclav.satek@vsb.cz
Search for other works by this author on:
S. Fialová,
S. Fialová
Victor Kaplan Department of Fluid Engineering,
Brno University of Technology,
Technická 2896/2,
Brno 616 69, Czech Republic
e-mail: fialova@fme.vutbr.cz
Brno University of Technology,
Technická 2896/2,
Brno 616 69, Czech Republic
e-mail: fialova@fme.vutbr.cz
Search for other works by this author on:
F. Pochylý
F. Pochylý
Victor Kaplan Department of Fluid Engineering,
Brno University of Technology,
Technická 2896/2,
Brno 616 69, Czech Republic
e-mail: pochyly@fme.vutbr.cz
Brno University of Technology,
Technická 2896/2,
Brno 616 69, Czech Republic
e-mail: pochyly@fme.vutbr.cz
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Kučera
IT4Innovations,
VŠB-TU Ostrava,
17 listopadu 15/2172,
Ostrava-Poruba 708 33, Czech Republic
e-mail: radek.kucera@vsb.cz
VŠB-TU Ostrava,
17 listopadu 15/2172,
Ostrava-Poruba 708 33, Czech Republic
e-mail: radek.kucera@vsb.cz
V. Šátek
IT4Innovations,
VŠB-TU Ostrava,
17 listopadu 15/2172,
Ostrava-Poruba 708 33, Czech Republic
e-mail: vaclav.satek@vsb.cz
VŠB-TU Ostrava,
17 listopadu 15/2172,
Ostrava-Poruba 708 33, Czech Republic
e-mail: vaclav.satek@vsb.cz
J. Haslinger
S. Fialová
Victor Kaplan Department of Fluid Engineering,
Brno University of Technology,
Technická 2896/2,
Brno 616 69, Czech Republic
e-mail: fialova@fme.vutbr.cz
Brno University of Technology,
Technická 2896/2,
Brno 616 69, Czech Republic
e-mail: fialova@fme.vutbr.cz
F. Pochylý
Victor Kaplan Department of Fluid Engineering,
Brno University of Technology,
Technická 2896/2,
Brno 616 69, Czech Republic
e-mail: pochyly@fme.vutbr.cz
Brno University of Technology,
Technická 2896/2,
Brno 616 69, Czech Republic
e-mail: pochyly@fme.vutbr.cz
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Fluids Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING. Manuscript received February 3, 2016; final manuscript received July 12, 2016; published online October 10, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Matevz Dular.
J. Fluids Eng. Jan 2017, 139(1): 011202 (9 pages)
Published Online: October 10, 2016
Article history
Received:
February 3, 2016
Revised:
July 12, 2016
Citation
Kučera, R., Šátek, V., Haslinger, J., Fialová, S., and Pochylý, F. (October 10, 2016). "Modeling of Hydrophobic Surfaces by the Stokes Problem With the Stick–Slip Boundary Conditions." ASME. J. Fluids Eng. January 2017; 139(1): 011202. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034199
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
A Wind Speed Forecasting Method Using Gaussian Process Regression Model Under Data Uncertainty
J. Fluids Eng (March 2025)
Design Process for Scaled Model Wind Turbines Using Field Measurements
J. Fluids Eng (March 2025)
Special Section on the 2024 ASME Turbo Expo on Wind and Renewable Energy Research
J. Fluids Eng (March 2025)
Freeman Scholar Lecture (2021)—Sharp-Interface Immersed Boundary Methods in Fluid Dynamics
J. Fluids Eng (March 2025)
Related Articles
Evaluating the In Vitro Mechanical Responses of Stem Cell Under Fluid Perfusion in Different Porous Scaffolds
ASME J of Medical Diagnostics (August,2023)
Finite Element and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Modeling of Fluid–Structure Interaction Using a Unified Computational Methodology
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (December,2018)
Effect of Surrounding Tissue on Vessel Fluid and Solid Mechanics
J Biomech Eng (December,2004)
Freeman Scholar Lecture (2021)—Sharp-Interface Immersed Boundary Methods in Fluid Dynamics
J. Fluids Eng (March,2025)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Completing the Picture
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine
List of Commercial Codes
Introduction to Finite Element, Boundary Element, and Meshless Methods: With Applications to Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow
Computational Modeling of Dynamic Planing Forces
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)