An adaptive method for detached-eddy simulation (DES) is tested by simulations of flow in a family of three-dimensional (3D) diffusers. The adaptive method either adjusts the model constant or defaults to a bound if the grid is too coarse. On the present grids, the adaptive method adjusts the model constant over most of the flow, without resorting to the default. Data for the diffuser family were created by wall-resolved, large-eddy simulation (LES), using the dynamic Smagorinsky model, for the purpose of testing turbulence models. The family is a parameterized set of geometries that allows one to test whether the pattern of separation is moving correctly from the top to the side wall as the parameter increases. The adaptive DES model is quite accurate in this regard. It is found to predict the mean velocity accurately, but the pressure coefficient is underpredicted. The latter is due to the onset of separation being slightly earlier in the DES than in the LES.

References

References
1.
Spalart
,
P. R.
,
2009
, “
Detached-Eddy Simulation
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
,
41
(
1
), p.
181
.
2.
Spalart
,
P. R.
,
Deck
,
S.
,
Shur
,
M. L.
,
Squires
,
K. D.
,
Strelets
,
M. K.
, and
Travin
,
A. K.
,
2006
, “
A New Version of Detached-Eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities
,”
Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn.
,
20
(
3
), p.
181
.
3.
Strelets
,
M.
,
2001
, “
Detached Eddy Simulation of Massively Separated Flows
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2001-0879.
4.
Reddy
,
K. R.
,
Ryon
,
J. A.
, and
Durbin
,
P. A.
,
2014
, “
A DDES Model With a Smagorinsky-Type Eddy Viscosity Formulation and Log-Layer Mismatch Correction
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
50
, p.
103
.
5.
Yin
,
Z.
,
Reddy
,
K. R.
, and
Durbin
,
P. A.
,
2015
, “
On the Dynamic Computation of the Model Constant in Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation
,”
Phys. Fluids
,
27
, p. 025105.
6.
Cherry
,
E. M.
,
Elkins
,
C. J.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
2008
, “
Geometric Sensitivity of Three-Dimensional Separated Flows
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
29
(
3
), p.
803
.
7.
Ohlsson
,
J.
,
Schlatter
,
P.
,
Fischer
,
P. F.
, and
Henningson
,
D. S.
,
2010
, “
Direct Numerical Simulation of Separated Flow in a Three-Dimensional Diffuser
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
650
, p.
307
.
8.
Jeyapaul
,
E.
, and
Durbin
,
P. A.
,
2010
, “
Three-Dimensional Turbulent Flow Separation in Diffusers
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2010-918.
9.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
,
1993
,
Turbulence Modeling for CFD
,
DCW Industries
, La Cacada, CA.
10.
Lilly
,
D. K.
,
1992
, “
A Proposed Modification of the Germano Subgrid-Scale Closure Method
,”
Phys. Fluids A
,
4
(
3
), p.
633
.
11.
OpenCFD
,
2004
, “
OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox
,” OpenCFD Ltd., Berkshire, UK.
12.
Lund
,
T. S.
,
Wu
,
X.
, and
Squires
,
K. D.
,
1998
, “
Generation of Turbulent Inflow Data for Spatially-Developing Boundary Layer Simulation
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
140
(
2
), pp.
233
258
.
13.
Jeyapaul
,
E.
,
2011
, “
Turbulent Flow Separation in Three-Dimensional Asymmetric Diffusers
,” Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
You do not currently have access to this content.