This research examines the novel use of a postswirl propulsor to generate side forces sufficient for undersea vehicle control. Numerical simulations using the commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code Fluent® were used to predict the side forces for open and ducted, post-swirl propulsors configured with an upstream rotor and movable downstream stator row. By varying the pitch angles of the stator blade about the circumference, it is possible to generate a mean stator side force that can be used to maneuver the vehicle while generating sufficient roll to counter the torque produced by the rotor. A simple geometric configuration was used to minimize body geometry effects to better understand the flow physics with simulations conducted in a water tunnel environment. Flow computations highlighted the component forces and were used to characterize the velocity fields between the rotor and stator blade rows as well as the velocity field in the stator wake. There was significant coupling between the rotor and stator blade rows as demonstrated by the rotor wake velocity profiles. While the flow fields were coupled, there was not a significant difference in rotor axial or side forces except for the largest pitch amplitudes. Predictions showed that the maneuvering propulsor generated side forces predominantly by the stator and body that significantly exceeded those produced by conventional undersea vehicle control surfaces with side force coefficients on the order of 0.5. These forces are approximately three times larger than those generated by conventional control surfaces on 21 in. unmanned undersea vehicles (UUV's). Even for zero flow velocities, side forces were produced due to the induced flow produced by the rotor over the stator, further demonstrating the potential for this technology to be used for undersea vehicle maneuvering.

References

References
1.
Huyer
,
S. A.
,
Dropkin
,
A.
,
Dick
,
J.
, and
Beal
,
D.
,
2010
, “
A Method to Generate Propulsor Side Forces
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
132
(
2
), p.
021101
.10.1115/1.4000745
2.
Huyer
,
S. A.
,
Dropkin
,
A.
,
Beal
,
D.
,
Farnsworth
,
J.
, and
Amitay
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Preswirl Maneuvering Propulsor
,”
J. Oceanic Eng.
,
37
(
1
), pp.
122
138
.10.1109/JOE.2011.2175509
3.
Farnsworth
,
J.
,
Amitay
,
M.
,
Beal
,
D.
, and
Huyer
,
S.
,
2011
, “
Measurements of a Stator-Induced Circumferentially-Varying Flow
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
51
(
2
), pp.
423
442
.10.1007/s00348-011-1060-z
4.
Roddy
,
R. F.
,
2003
, “
Investigation of the Resistance, Propulsion, Stability, and Control Characteristics of the NUWC/ARL UUV IMP From Captive Model Experiments
,” Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Report No. NSWCCD-50-TR-2003/010.
5.
Welch
,
J. R.
,
2007
, “
Design & Implementation of a Simulink Based Test Bed for Developing Prototype Algorithms for the Midsized Autonomous Research Vehicle (MARV)
,” Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Report No. NUWC TR-11822.
6.
Panish
,
R.
,
2009
, “
Dynamic Control Capabilities and Developments of the Bluefin Robotics AUV Fleet
,”
Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology (UUST)
, pp.
1
8
.
7.
ANSYS Inc.,
2014
, ANSYS Fluent® Users Guide,
Version 15.0
, www.ansys.com.
8.
Gorski
,
J. J.
,
2004
, “
Evolving Computational Capability for Ship Hydrodynamics
,” Naval Surface Warfare Center, Technical Report No. NSWCCD-50-TR-2004/058.
9.
Rhee
,
S. H.
, and
Joshi
,
S.
,
2005
, “
Computational Validation for Flow Around a Marine Propeller Using Unstructured Mesh Based Navier–Stokes Solver
,”
JSME Int. J. Series B
,
48
(
3
), pp.
562
570
.10.1299/jsmeb.48.562
10.
Morgut
,
M.
, and
Nobile
,
E.
,
2012
, “
Influence of Grid Type and Turbulence Model on the Numerical Prediction of the Flow Around Marine Propellers Working in Uniform Inflow
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
42
, pp.
26
34
.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.01.012
11.
Gaggero
,
S.
,
Villa
,
D.
, and
Brizzolara
,
S.
,
2010
, “
RANS and PANEL Method for Unsteady Flow Propeller Analysis
,”
J. Hydrodyn.
,
22
(
5
), pp.
547
552
.10.1016/S1001-6058(09)60253-5
12.
Chase
,
N.
, and
Carrica
,
P. M.
,
2013
, “
Submarine Propeller Computations and Application to Self-Propulsion of DARPA Suboff
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
60
, pp.
68
80
.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.029
13.
Peng
,
H.
,
Qiu
,
W.
, and
Ni
,
S.
,
2013
, “
Effect of Turbulence Models on RANS Computation of Propeller Vortex Flow
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
72
, pp.
304
317
.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.07.009
14.
Miller
,
R.
,
Gorski
,
J.
,
Xing
,
T.
,
Carrica
,
P.
, and
Stern
,
F.
,
2006
, “
Resistance Predictions of High Speed Mono and Multihull Ships With and Without Water Jet Propulsors Using URANS
,”
26th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
, pp.
1
16
.
15.
Dropkin
,
A.
,
Huyer
,
S. A.
, and
Henoch
,
C.
,
2011
, “
Combined Experimental/Numerical Development of Propulsor Evaluation Capability
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
133
(
8
), p.
081105
.10.1115/1.4004387
16.
ASME,
2008
, “
ASME Guide on Verification and Validation in Computational Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
,” ANSI Standard V&V-20, Technical Report ASME Committee No. PTC-61.
You do not currently have access to this content.