Carbon dioxide is an attractive alternative to conventional refrigerants due to its low direct global warming effects. Unfortunately, CO2 and many alternative refrigerants have lower thermodynamic performance resulting in larger indirect emissions. The effective use of ejectors to recover part of the lost expansion work, which occurs in throttling devices, can close this performance gap and enable the use of CO2. In an ejector, the pressure of the motive fluid is converted into momentum through a choked converging-diverging nozzle, which then entrains and raises the energy of a lower-momentum suction flow. In a two-phase ejector, the motive nozzle flow is complicated by the nonequilibrium phase change affecting local sonic velocity and leading to various types of shockwaves, pseudo shocks, and expansion waves inside or outside the exit of the nozzle. Since the characteristics of the jet leaving the motive nozzle greatly affect the performance of the ejector, this paper focuses on the details of flow development and shockwave interaction within and just outside the nozzle. The analysis is based on a high-fidelity model that incorporates real-fluid properties of CO2, local mass and energy transfer between phases, and a two-phase sonic velocity model in the presence of finite-rate phase change. The model has been validated against the literature data for two-phase supersonic nozzles and overall ejector performance data. The results show that due to nonequilibrium effects and delayed phase change, the flow can choke well downstream of the minimum-area throat. In addition, Mach number profiles show that, although phase change is at a maximum near the boundaries, the flow first becomes supersonic in the interior of the flow where sound speed is lowest. Shock waves occurring within the nozzle can interact with the boundary layer flow and result in a ‘shock train’ and a sequence of subsonic and supersonic flow previously observed in single-phase nozzles. In cases with lower nozzle back pressure, the flow continues to accelerate through the nozzle and the exit pressure adjusts in a series of supersonic expansion waves.

References

References
1.
Kandil
,
S.
,
Lear
,
W.
, and
Sherif
,
S.
,
2006
, “
Design and Performance of Two-Phase Ejectors for Space Thermal Management Applications
,”
4th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit (IECEC)
, June.
2.
Yapici
,
R.
and
Ersoy
,
H.
,
2005
, “
Performance Characteristics of the Ejector Refrigeration System Based on the Constant Area Ejector Flow Model
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
46
, pp.
3117
3135
.10.1016/j.enconman.2005.01.010
3.
Sriveerakul
,
T.
,
Aphornratana
,
S.
, and
Chunnanond
,
K.
,
2007
, “
Performance Prediction of Steam Ejector Using Computational Fluid Dynamics: Part 1. Validation of the CFD Results
,”
Int. J. Therm. Sci.
,
46
, pp.
812
822
.10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.10.014
4.
Bartosiewicz
,
Y.
,
Aidouna
,
Z.
,
Desevaux
,
P.
, and
Mercadier
,
Y.
,
2005
, “
Numerical and Experimental Investigations on Supersonic Ejectors
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
26
, pp.
56
70
.10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2004.07.003
5.
Desevaux
,
P.
,
Marynowski
,
T.
, and
Mercadier
,
Y.
,
2008
, “
CFD Simulation of a Condensing Flow in a Supersonic Ejector: Validation Against Flow Visualization
,”
ISFV13 International Symposium of Flow Visualization
, July
.
6.
Nakagawa
,
M.
,
Berana
,
M. S.
, And
Kishine
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Supersonic Two-Phase Flow of CO2 Through Converging-Diverging Nozzles for the Ejector Refrigeration Cycles
,”
Int. J. Refrig.
,
32
(
6
), pp.
1195
1202
.10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.01.015
7.
Lee
,
J.
,
Madabhushi
,
R.
,
Fotache
,
C.
,
Gopalakrishnan
,
S.
, and
Schmidt
,
D.
,
2009
, “
Flashing Flow of Superheated Jet Fuel
,
Proc. Combust. Inst.
,
32
(
2
), pp.
3215
3222
.10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.153
8.
Ando
,
K.
,
Colonius
,
T.
, and
Brennen
,
C. E.
,
2011
, “
Numerical Simulation of Shock Propagation in a Polydisperse Bubbly Liquid
,
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
37
(
6
), pp.
596
608
.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.03.007
9.
Wijngaarden
,
L. V.
,
1967
, “
On the Equations of Motion for Mixtures of Liquid and Gas Bubbles
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
33
, pp.
465
474
.10.1017/S002211206800145X
10.
Watanabe
,
M.
and
Prosperetti
,
A.
,
1994
, “
Shock Waves in Dilute Bubbly Liquids
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
274
, pp.
349
381
.10.1017/S0022112094002156
11.
Kameda
,
M.
,
Shimaura
,
N.
,
Higashino
,
F.
, and
Matsumoto
,
Y.
,
1998
, “
Shock Waves in a Uniform Bubbly Flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
,
10
(
10
), pp.
2661
2668
.10.1063/1.869779
12.
Delale
,
C. F.
,
Nas
,
S.
, and
Tryggvason
,
G.
,
2005
, “
Direct Numerical Simulations of Shock Propagation in Bubbly Liquids
,”
Phys. Fluids
,
17
(
12
), p.
121705
.10.1063/1.2158431
13.
Delale
,
C.
and
Tryggvason
,
G.
,
2008
, “
Shock Structure in Bubbly Liquids: Comparison of Direct Numerical Simulations and Model Equations
,”
Shock Waves
,
17
, pp.
433
440
.10.1007/s00193-008-0126-1
14.
Seo
,
J. H.
,
Lele
,
S. K.
, and
Tryggvason
,
G.
,
2010
, “
Investigation and Modeling of Bubble-Bubble Interaction Effect in Homogeneous Bubbly Flows
,”
Phys. Fluids
,
22
(
6
), p.
063302
.10.1063/1.3432503
15.
Ando
,
K.
,
Sanada
,
T.
,
Inaba
,
K.
,
Damazo
,
J. S.
,
Shepherd
,
J. E.
,
Colonius
,
T.
, and
Brennen
,
C. E.
,
2011
, “
Shock Propagation Through a Bubbly Liquid in a Deformable Tube
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
671
, pp.
339
363
.10.1017/S0022112010005707
16.
Yazdani
,
M.
,
Alahyari
,
A. A.
, and
Radcliff
,
T. D.
,
2012
, “
Numerical Modeling of Two-Phase Supersonic Ejectors for Work-Recovery Applications
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
55
(
21–22
), pp.
5744
5753
.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.05.071
17.
ANSYS Inc.
,
2008
, ‘FLUENT V12.0 User's Guide,” Lebanon, NH.
18.
Singhal
,
A. K.
,
Athavale
,
M. M.
,
Li
,
H.
, and
Jiang
,
Y.
,
2002
, “
Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
124
(
3
), pp.
617
624
.10.1115/1.1486223
19.
Brennen
,
C. E.
,
2005
,
Fundamentals of Multiphase Flow
,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
.
20.
Lemmon
,
E. W.
,
McLinden
,
M. O.
, and
Huber
,
M. L.
,
2002
, “
NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties (REFPROP)
,” NIST Standard Reference Database 23 v7.0, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
You do not currently have access to this content.