The available information describing the various stages of flow conditions that occur as the flow transitions from noncavitation to cavitation (turbulent flow), supercavitation, and finally separation in sharp-edge 90 deg orifices is extensive. However, although sharp-edge orifices in cross flow represent a significant number of injection schemes inherent in many applications, data for this configuration are sparse or nonexistent. This study is intended to increase the database and understanding of the driving variables affecting the flow in all of these conditions. Tests were carried out in a unique test facility capable of achieving large variations in back pressure, flowrate, and operating upstream pressure. The configuration and test ranges of this study includes orifice length/diameter ratios from 2 to 10, upstream pressures from 7.03kg/cm2 to 105.1kg/cm2, orifice/manifold area ratio of 0.028 to 0.082, and manifold cross flow velocity of from 410 cm/s to 1830 cm/s. The results for these small area ratio configurations support two different first order models, one for cavitation and the other noncavitation both in turbulent flow. Under cavitation conditions the discharge coefficient is related to the contraction coefficient and the cavitation parameter to the 1/2 power. In the noncavitation flow regime the head loss is related to the loss coefficient and the dynamic pressure at the orifice exit. Both the head loss and contraction coefficient were found to be a strong function of the ratio of manifold/orifice exit velocity. Equations are provided defining the relationships that allow determination of the contraction coefficient, discharge coefficient, and head loss between the contraction coefficient, as well as the loss coefficient and operating conditions. Cavitation parameter values for cavitation inception, cavitation, and supercavitation are also provided. The potential flow theory was shown to predict the contraction coefficient when upstream (manifold to vena-contracta) losses are minimal.

1.
White
,
F. M.
, 1986,
Fluid Mechanics
,
2nd ed.
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
, pp.
361
369
.
2.
Arcoumanis
,
C.
,
Gavaises
,
J. M.
,
Nouri
,
J. M.
,
Abdul-Wahab
,
E.
, and
Horrocks
,
R. W.
, 1998, “
Analysis of the Flow in the Nozzle of a Vertical Multi Hole Diesel Engine Injector
,” SAE Paper No. 980811.
3.
Idelchik
,
I. E.
, 2003,
Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance
,
3rd ed.
,
Jaico
.
4.
Gill
,
G. S.
, and
Nurick
,
W. H.
, 1976, “
Liquid Rocket Engine Injectors
,”
NASA
Report No. SP 8089.
5.
Nurick
,
W. H.
, and
McHale
,
R. M.
, 1970, “
Noncircular Orifice Holes and Advanced Fabrication Techniques for Liquid Rocket Injectors
,” Rocketdyne, Canoga Park, CA, Final Report No. NASA CR-108570.
6.
Northrup
,
R. P.
, 1951, “
Flow Stability in Small Orifices
,”
Proceedings of the American Rocket Society
,
ASME
,
New York
, Nov. 30.
7.
Andrews
,
K. A.
, and
Sabersky
,
R. H.
, 1990, “
Flow Through an Orifice From a Transverse Stream
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
112
, pp.
524
526
.
8.
Rohde
,
J. E.
,
Richards
,
H. T.
, and
Metger
,
G. W.
, 1969, “
Discharge Coefficient for Thick Plate Orifices With Approach Flow Perpendicular and Inclined to the Orifice Axis
,”
NASA
Report No. TN D-5467, pp.
1
28
.
9.
Strakey
,
P. A.
and
Talley
,
D. G.
, 1999, “
The Effect of Manifold Cross-Flow on the Discharge Coefficient of Sharp-Edged Orifices
,”
Atomization Sprays
1044-5110,
9
(
1
), pp.
51
68
.
10.
Nurick
,
W. H.
,
Ohanian
,
T.
,
Talley
,
D. G.
, and
Strakey
,
P. A.
, 2008, “
The Impact of Manifold-to-Orifice Turning Angle on Sharp-Edge Orifice Flow Characteristics in Both Cavitation and Noncavitation Turbulent Flow Regimes
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
130
, p.
121102
.
11.
Weisbach
,
J.
, 1855,
Die Experimental Hydraulik
,
Englehardt
,
Frieburg
.
12.
Lichtarowicz
,
A.
,
Duggins
,
R.
, and
Markland
,
E.
, 1965, “
Discharge Coefficients for Incompressible Non-Cavitating Flow Through Long Orifices
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0022-2542,
7
(
7
), pp.
210
219
.
13.
1976,
Flow of Fluids Through Valves, Fittings, and Pipe
,
Crane Co.
,
Stamford, CT
.
14.
Chaves
,
H.
,
Knapp
,
M.
,
Kubitzek
,
A.
,
Obermeier
,
F.
, and
Schneider
,
T.
, 1955, “
Experimental Study of Cavitation in the Nozzle Hole of Diesel Injectors Using Transparent Nozzles
,” SAE Paper No. 950290.
15.
Koivula
,
T.
, 2000, “
On Cavitation in Fluid Power
,”
Proceedings of the First FPNI-PhD Symposium
, Hamburg, Germany, pp.
371
382
.
16.
Nurick
,
W. H.
, 1976, “
Orifice Cavitation and Its Effects on Spray Mixing
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
98
, pp.
681
687
.
17.
Knapp
,
R.
,
Daily
,
J. W.
, and
Hammitt
,
F. G.
, 1970,
Cavitation
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
18.
Bergwerk
,
W.
, 1959, “
Flow Pattern in Diesel Nozzle Spray Holes
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
0020-3483,
173
(
21
), pp.
655
660
.
19.
Sato
,
K.
, and
Saito
,
Y.
, 2002, “
Unstable Cavitation Behavior in a Circular-Cylindrical Orifice Flow
,”
JSME Int. J., Ser. B
1340-8054,
45
(
3
), pp.
638
645
.
20.
Ganippa
,
L. C.
,
Bark
,
G.
,
Andersson
,
S.
, and
Chomiak
,
J.
, 2004, “
Cavitation: A Contributory Factor in the Transition From Symmetric to Asymmetric Jets in Cross-Flow Nozzles
,”
Exp. Fluids
0723-4864,
36
, pp.
627
634
.
21.
Martynov
,
S.
,
Mason
,
D.
, and
Heikal
,
M.
, 2005, “
Hydrodynamic Similarity of Cavitation Flows in Nozzles
,”
Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Multiphase Flow, Heat Mass Transfer and Energy Conversion
, Xi'an, China, July 3–6.
22.
Schmidt
,
D. P.
,
Rutland
,
C. J.
, and
Corradini
,
M. L.
, 1997, “
A Numerical Study of Cavitating Flow Through Various Nozzle Shapes
,” SAE Paper No. 971597.
23.
Schmidt
,
D. P.
,
Rutland
,
C. J.
, and
Corradini
,
M. L.
, 1999, “
Cavitation in Two Dimensional Asymmetric Nozzles
,” SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0518.
24.
Soteriou
,
C.
,
Andrews
,
R.
, and
Smith
,
M.
, 1995, “
Direct Injection Diesel Sprays and the Effect of Cavitation and Hydraulic Flip on Atomization
,” SAE Paper No. 950080.
25.
Nishimura
,
A.
, and
Assanis
,
D. N.
, 2000, “
A Model for Primary Fuel Atomization Based on Cavitation Bubble Collapse Energy
,”
Eighth International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Sprays (ICLASS 2000)
, Pasadena, CA, Jul. 16–20.
26.
Mishra
,
C.
, and
Peles
,
Y.
, 2005, “
Cavitation in Flow Through a Micro-Orifice Inside a Silicon Microchannel
,”
Phys. Fluids
1070-6631,
17
, pp.
013601
.
27.
Zhang
,
L.
,
Koo
,
J.
,
Goodson
,
K.
,
Santiago
,
J.
, and
Kenny
,
T.
, 2002, “
Measurements and Modeling of Two-Phase Flow in Microchannels With Nearly Constant Heat Flux Boundary Conditions
,”
J. Microelectromech. Syst.
1057-7157,
11
(
1
), pp.
12
19
.
28.
Cubaud
,
T.
, and
Ho
,
C. -H.
, 2004, “
Transport of Bubbles in Square Microchannels
,”
Phys. Fluids
1070-6631,
16
(
12
), pp.
4575
4585
.
29.
McNown
,
J. S.
, and
Hsu
,
E. -Y.
, 1950, “
Application of Conformal Mapping to Divided Flow
,”
First Midwestern Conference on Fluid Dynamics
, pp.
143
155
.
30.
Perry
,
C. H.
, and
Chilton
,
R. H.
, 1973,
Chemical Engineers’ Handbook
,
5th ed.
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
31.
Vernard
,
J. K.
, 1963,
Elementary Fluid Dynamics
,
5th ed.
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.