Ambiguities, inconsistencies, and recommended interpretations of the commonly cited definition of validation for computational fluid dynamics codes/models are examined. It is shown that the definition-deduction approach is prone to misinterpretation, and that bottom-up descriptions rather than top-down legalistic definitions are to be preferred for science-based engineering and journal policies, though legalistic definitions are necessary for contracts.
Perspective: Validation—What Does It Mean?
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Cite Icon Cite
- Search Site
Roache, P. J. (February 4, 2009). "Perspective: Validation—What Does It Mean?." ASME. J. Fluids Eng. March 2009; 131(3): 034503. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3077134
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager
Get Email Alerts
Numerical Investigations of Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow in a Pump Inducer
J. Fluids Eng (February 2020)
A Coupled Overset Mesh and Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin Algorithm for Pseudo-Compressible Flow
J. Fluids Eng (January 2020)