The ability to accurately predict the aerodynamic torque and lift and drag forces on a 2-D model of a 0.18 aspect ratio biconvex circular-arc disk operating in a compressible flow using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was investigated. Fluent 6.0 was the CFD package utilized to perform these calculations. Grid-convergence and time-convergence/stability were analyzed first, followed by a qualitative study of the Spalart-Allmaras, $k-ε$, and $k-ω$ turbulence models with their enhancement features and model variants. Fluent was used to predict the pressure profile on the disk surface for disk positions 30, 45, and 60 deg (where 0 deg is the fully closed position) and over a range of pressure ratios. The pressure ratios were selected to determine the capability of CFD to accurately predict the flow field and resulting torque in flows ranging from nearly incompressible to highly compressible. Fluent predictions for the pressure profiles on the disk were compared to test data so that the lift and drag forces and aerodynamic torque could be determined responsibly. Acceptable comparisons were noted.

1.
Morris
,
M. J.
, 1987, “
An Investigation of Compressible Flow Through Butterfly Valves
,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
2.
Crane Co.
, 1988, “
Flow through Valves, Fittings, and Pipes
,” Technical Paper No. 410, Signal Hill, CA.
3.
Kalsi Engineering
, 745 Park Two Drive, Sugar Land, TX, 77478-2885, 281-240-6500, www.kalsi.comwww.kalsi.com
4.
Silvester
,
R. S.
, 1980, “
Torque Induced by Compressible Flow Through a Butterfly Valve with an Asymmetric Disc Design
,” BHRA Fluid Engineering, RR1602, Project No. R. P. 21373.
5.
Steele
,
R.
, Jr.
, and
Watkins
,
J. C.
, 1985, “
Containment Purge and Vent Valve Test Program Final Report
,” EG&G Idaho, Inc., Idaho National Laboratory, NUREG/CR-4141 EG-2374.
6.
Morris
,
M. J.
, and
Dutton
,
J. C.
, 1991, “
An Experimental Investigation of Butterfly-Valve Performance Downstream of an Elbow
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
113
, pp.
81
85
.
7.
Morris
,
M. J.
, and
Dutton
,
J. C.
, 1991, “
The Performance of Two Butterfly Valves Mounted in Series
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
113
, pp.
419
423
.
8.
Danbon
,
F.
, and
Solliec
,
C.
, 2000, “
Aerodynamic Torque of a Butterfly Valve-Influence of an Elbow on the Time-Mean and Instantaneous Aerodynamic Torque
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
122
, pp.
337
344
.
9.
Solliec
,
C.
, and
Danbon
,
F.
, 1999, “
Aerodynamic Torque Acting on a Butterfly Valve. Comparison and Choice of Torque Coefficient
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
121
, pp.
914
919
.
10.
Wilcox
,
D.
, 1993,
Turbulence Modeling for CFD
,
Griffin Printing
, Glendale, CA.
11.
Fluent
, 2001, “
Fluent User’s Guide
,” Ver. 6.0.20, Fluent Inc.
12.
Bernard
,
P. W.
, and
Wallace
,
J. M.
, 2002,
Turbulent Flow
,
Wiley
, New York.
13.
Ferziger
,
J. H.
, and
Peric
,
M.
, 2002,
Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics
,
Springer
, Berlin.
14.
Leutwyler
,
Z.
, and
Dalton
,
C
, 2004, “
A CFD Study to Analyze the Aerodynamic Torque, Lift, and Drag Forces for a Butterfly Valve in the Mid-stroke Position
,” presented at the ASME HT-FED Summer 2004 Conference, Charlotte, NC.