Pressure screening is an efficient means of removing various contaminants that degrade the appearance and strength of paper. A critical component of a screen is the rotor, which induces a tangential velocity to the suspension and produces pressure pulses to keep the screen apertures clear. To understand the effect of key design and operating variables for a NACA foil rotor, a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulation was developed using FLUENT, and the results were compared to experimental measurements. Comparing the pressure pulses obtained through CFD to experimental measurements over a wide range of foil tip speeds, clearances, angles of attack, and foil cambers, general trends of the pressure pulses were similar, but the overall computed values were 40% smaller than the measured values. The pressure pulse peak was found to increase linearly with the square of tip speed for all the angles of attack studied. The maximum magnitudes of negative pressure pulse occurred for the NACA 0012 and 4312 foils at a $5deg$ angle of attack and for the NACA 8312 foil at $0deg$. The stall angle of attack was found to be $∼5deg$ for NACA 8312, $∼10deg$ for NACA 4312, and $∼15deg$ for NACA 0012. The positive pressure peak near the leading edge of the foil was eliminated for foils operating at a positive angle of attack. The magnitude of the negative pressure coefficient peak increased as clearance decreased. Increased camber increases both the magnitude and width of the negative pressure pulse.

1.
Niinimaki
,
J.
, and
Dahl
,
O.
, 1998, “
A Comparison of Pressure Screen Baskets With Different Slot Widths and Profile Heights. Selection of the Right Surface for a Groundwood Application
,”
Pap. Puu
0031-1243,
80
(
8
), pp.
31
45
.
2.
Cox
,
M.
,
Fredriksson
,
B.
, and
Koikkalainen
,
J.
, 2000, “
Mill Experience With High-Consistency, Screening Technology for Recycled Fibre
,”
Pap. Technol. (Bury, U.K.)
0958-6024,
41
(
9
), pp.
31
36
.
3.
Levis
,
S. H.
, 1991, “
Screening of Secondary Fibers
,”
Prog. Pap. Recyc.
,
5
(
1
), pp.
31
45
.
4.
Repo
,
K.
, and
Sundholm
,
J.
, 1996, “
The Effect of Rotor Speed on the Separation of Coarse Fibres in Pressure Screening With Narrow Slots
,”
Pulp Pap. Can.
,
97
(
7
), pp.
T253
T257
.
5.
Gooding
,
R. W.
, 1996, “
Flow Resistance of Screen Plate Apertures
,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of British Columbia.
6.
Niinimaki
,
J.
, 1999, “
Phenomena Affecting the Efficiency of a Pressure Screen
,” Tappi Pulping Conf., pp.
957
966
.
7.
Yu
,
C. J.
, and
DeFoe
,
R. J.
, 1994, “
Fundamental Study of Screening Hydraulics Part 3: Model for Calculating Effective Open Area
,”
Tappi J.
0734-1415,
77
(
9
), pp.
125
131
.
8.
Gonzalez
,
J. A.
, 2002, “
Characterization of Design Parameters for a Free Foil Rotor in a Pressure Screen
,” M.A.Sc. thesis, The University of British Columbia.
9.
Wikström
,
T.
, 2002, “
Transition Modelling of Pulp Suspensions Applied to a Pressure Screen
,”
J. Pulp Pap. Sci.
0826-6220,
28
(
11
), pp.
374
378
.
10.
Karvinen
,
R.
, and
Halonen
,
L.
, 1984, “
The Effect of Various Factors on Pressure Pulsation of a Screen
,”
Pap. Puu
0031-1243,
66
(
2
), pp.
80
83
.
11.
Marko
,
J. J.
, and
LaRiviere
,
C. J.
, 1999, “
The Use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) in Pressure Screen Design
,” Tappi Papermakers Conf., pp.
1477
1482
.
12.
Pinon
,
V.
,
Gooding
,
R. W.
, and
Olson
,
J. A.
, 2003, “
Measurements of Pressure Pulses From a Solid Core Screen Rotor
,”
Tappi J.
0734-1415,
2
(
10
), pp.
9
12
.
13.
Olson
,
J. A.
, and
Wherrett
,
G. W.
, 1998, “
A Model of Fibre Fractionation by Slotted Screen Apertures
,”
J. Pulp Pap. Sci.
0826-6220,
24
(
12
), pp.
398
403
.
14.
Kumar
,
A.
, 1991, “
Passage of Fibres Through Screen Apertures
,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of British Columbia.
15.
Fluent Inc., 1998,
Fluent Users Guide
,
Fluent Inc
.
16.
Lombardi
,
G.
,
Salvetti
,
M. V.
, and
Pinelli
,
d.
, 2000, “
Numerical Evaluation of Airfoil Friction Drag
,”
J. Aircr.
0021-8669,
37
(
2
), pp.
354
356
.
17.
Abbott
,
I. H.
, and
Von Doenhoff
,
A. E.
, 1949,
Theory of Wing Sections
,
McGraw-Hill
, New York.