Previously, experimental results for the velocity field in a torque converter pump showed strong jet/wake characteristics including backflows and circulatory secondary flows. To understand the fundamental flow behavior simplified analytical/numerical Navier-Stokes flow models were developed herein to independently analyze the pump pressure-to-suction side jet/wake flow, the core-to-shell side jet/wake flow, and the secondary flows. Parametric studies were undertaken to evaluate the effect that operating conditions and geometry had on the characteristics. Two relatively simple models were employed: (i) a rotating two-dimensional straight-walled duct to model the pressure-to-suction side jet/wake flow due to rotational Coriolis forces and (ii) a 180 deg flow bend to model the core-to-shell side jet/wake flow due to rapid radial/axial flow turning. The formation and development of the pump jet/wake flow was studied in detail. Results showed that the suction side wake, which was due to the counter-rotational tangential Coriolis force, was almost only a function of the modified Rossby number and independent of the Reynolds number. Increasing the modified Rossby number increased the pressure-to-suction side jet/wake flow. A geometric parameter that was seen to affect the pump flow was the backsweeping angle for the pressure-to-suction side jet/wake. Results showed that using backswept blades can completely eliminate the pressure-to-suction side jet/wake flow effect. Other geometrical parameters were tested but only a small to moderate influence on the jet/wake flow phenomena was found. Predicted trends compared favorably with experimental results.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
jets, wakes, torque convertors, rotational flow, Navier-Stokes equations, pipe flow, blades
Topics:
Flow (Dynamics), Pressure, Pumps, Suction, Torque converters, Wakes, Blades, Coriolis force, Ducts, Reynolds number, Geometry
1.
Fister, W., and Adrian, F. W., 1983, “Experimental Researches of Flow in Hydrodynamic Torque Converters,” Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Fluid Machinery, September 13–16, Budapest, Hungary, 1, pp. 210–224.
2.
Browarzik, V., 1994, “Experimental Investigation of Rotor/Rotor Interaction in a Hydrodynamic Torque Converter Using Hot Film Anemometry,” 39th International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, The Hague, The Netherlands, June 13–16, ASME paper no. 94-GT-246.
3.
Watanabe, H., Kurahashi, T., and Kojima, M., 1997, “Flow Visualization and Measurement of Torque Converter Stator Blades Using a Laser Sheet Lighting Method and a Laser Velocimeter,” SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, February 24–27, SAE paper no. 970680.
4.
Ejiri, E., and Kubo, M., 1997, “Performance Analysis of Torque Converter Elements,” ASME Fluids Engineering Meeting, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, June 22–26, ASME paper no. FEDSM97-3219.
5.
By, R. R., and Lakshminarayana, B., 1993, “Measurement and Analysis of Static Pressure Fields in a Torque Converter Pump,” 2nd ASME Pumping Machinery Symposium, Washington, DC, June 20–24, 154, pp. 253–264.
6.
By, R. R., Kunz, R. F., and Lakshminarayana, B., 1993, “Navier Stokes Analysis of the Pump of an Automotive Torque Converter,” 2nd ASME Pumping Machinery Symposium, Washington, DC, June 20–24, 154, pp. 264–274.
7.
Marathe
,
B. V.
, and
Lakshminarayana
,
B.
,
1995
, “
Experimental Investigation of Steady and Unsteady Flow Field Downstream of an Automotive Torque Converter Turbine and Stator
,”
Int. J. Rotating Mach.
,
2
, pp.
67
–
84
.
8.
Dong, Y., Lakshminarayana, B., and Maddock, D. G., 1997, “Steady and Unsteady Flow Field at Pump and Turbine Exit of a Torque Converter,” 1997 ASME Fluid Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Vancouver, June 22–26, ASME paper no. FEDSM97-3351.
9.
Bahr
,
H. M.
,
Flack
,
R. D.
,
By
,
R. R.
, and
Zhang
,
J. J.
,
1990
, “
Laser Velocimeter Measurements in the Stator of a Torque Converter
,”
SAE Trans.
,
99
, pp.
1625
–
1634
.
10.
Gruver
,
J. K.
,
Flack
,
R. D.
, and
Brun
,
K.
,
1996
, “
Laser Velocimeter Measurements in the Pump of a Torque Converter Part I—Average Measurements
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
562
–
569
.
11.
Brun
,
K.
, and
Flack
,
R. D.
,
1997
, “
Laser Velocimeter Measurements in the Turbine of an Automotive Torque Converter, Part I—Average Measurements
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
646
–
654
.
12.
Ainley
,
S. B.
, and
Flack
,
R. D.
,
2000
, “
Laser Velocimeter Measurements in the Stator of an Automotive Torque Converter
,”
Int. J. Rotating Mach.
,
6
, pp.
417
–
431
.
13.
Whitehead, L. D., 1995, “A Comparison of the Internal Flow Fields of Two Automotive Torque Converters Using Laser Velocimetry,” M.S. thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
14.
Yermakov, A., 1998, “A Study of the Internal Flow Fields of Two Automotive Torque Converter Turbines Using Laser Velocimetry,” M.S. thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
15.
Claudel, W. D., 1997, “A Comparison of the Internal Flow Fields of Three Automotive Torque Converter Pumps Using Laser Velocimetry,” M.S. thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
16.
Schweitzer, J., and Gandham, J., 2002, “Computational Fluid Dynamics on Torque Converters—Validation and Application,” Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery (ISROMAC-9), Honolulu, Hawaii, February 10–14, paper No. FD-ABS-046.
17.
Dean
, Jr.,
R. C.
, and
Senoo
,
Y.
,
1960
, “
Rotating Wakes in Vaneless Diffusers
,”
J. Basic Eng.
,
82
, pp.
563
–
570
.
18.
Eckardt
,
D.
,
1976
, “
Detailed Flow Investigations Within a High Speed Centrifugal Compressor Impeller
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
98
, pp.
390
–
402
.
19.
Johnson
,
M. W.
, and
Moore
,
J.
,
1980
, “
The Development of Wake Flow in a Centrifugal Impeller
,”
J. Eng. Power
,
102
, pp.
382
–
390
.
20.
Flowplus, 1994, FlowPlus User’s Guide—Finite Element CFD Solver Version 1.2–2, Blue Ridge Numerics, Inc., Charlottesville, Virginia.
21.
Rice
,
J. G.
, and
Schnipke
,
R. J.
,
1985
, “
A Monotone Streamline Upwind Finite Element Method for Convection Dominated Flows
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
48
, pp.
313
–
327
.
22.
Adler
,
D.
,
1980
, “
Status of Centrifugal Impeller Internal Aerodynamics Part II: Experiments and Influence of Viscosity
,”
J. Eng. Power
,
102
, pp.
738
–
746
.
23.
Moore, J., 1967, “Effects of Coriolis on Turbulent Flow in Rotating Rectangular Channels,” MIT Gas Turbine Laboratory Report, No. 89, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.