In his now classical paper on pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers, Clauser concluded that equilibrium flows were very special flows difficult to achieve experimentally and that few flows were actually in equilibrium [1]. However, using similarity analysis of the Navier–Stokes equations, Castillo and George [2] defined an equilibrium flow as one where the pressure parameter, $Λ=[δ/ρU∞2dδ/dx]dP∞/dx,$ was a constant. They further showed that most flows were in equilibrium and the exceptions were nonequilibrium flows where Λ≠constant. Using the equations of motion and similarity analysis, it will be shown that even nonequilibrium flows, as those over airfoils or with sudden changes on the external pressure gradient, are in equilibrium state, but only locally. Moreover, in the case of airfoils where the external pressure gradient changes from favorable to zero then to adverse, three distinctive regions are identified. Each region is given by a constant value of $Λθ,$ and each region remains in equilibrium with $Λθ=constant,$ respectively.

1.
Clauser
,
F. H.
,
1956
, “
The Turbulent Boundary Layer
,”
,
4
, pp.
1
54
.
2.
Castillo
,
L.
, and
George
,
W. K.
,
2001
, “
Similarity Analysis for Turbulent Boundary Layer With Pressure Gradient: Outer Flow
,”
AIAA J.
,
39
, pp.
41
47
.
3.
,
P.
,
1967
, “
The Turbulent Structure of Equilibrium Boundary Layers
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
29
, pp.
624
645
.
4.
Townsend, A. A., 1956, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, Cambridge University Press, London.
5.
Rotta, J. C., 1962, “Turbulent Boundary Layers in Incompressible Flow,” Progr. Aeronautical Sci., Vol. 2., Pergamon, New York.
6.
Townsend, A. A., 1976, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 2nd ed., Cambridge, London.
7.
East, L. F., and Sawyer, W. G., 1979, “An Investigation of the Equilibrium Turbulent Boundary Layers,” Turbulent Boundary Layers: Experiment Theory and Modelling, AGARD, CP-271, 6.1–6.19.
8.
Ska˚re
,
P. E.
, and
,
P.
,
1994
, “
A Turbulent Equilibrium Boundary Layer Near Separation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
272
, pp.
319
348
.
9.
,
B. A.
, and
Yaglom
,
A. M.
,
1977
, “
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
89
, pp.
305
342
.
10.
Coles, D. E., and Hirst, E. A., 1968, Computational of Turbulent Boundary Layers-1968 AFOSR-IFP-Stanford Conference, Vol. II.
11.
Castillo
,
L.
,
Wang
,
X.
, and
George
,
W.
,
2003
, “
Separation Criterion for Turbulent Boundary Layers via Similarity Analysis
,”
J. Fluid Eng.
126
, pp.
297
304
.
12.
Bradshaw, P., and Ferriss, D., 1965, “The Response of a Retarded Equilibrium Turbulent Boundary Layer to the Sudden Removal of Pressure Gradient,” NPL Aero. Rep., 1145.
13.
Tennekes, H., and Lumley, J. L., 1972, A First Course in Turbulence, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
14.
Simpson
,
R. L.
,
1989
, “
Turbulent Boundary-Layer Separation
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
,
21
, pp.
205
234
.
15.
Simpson
,
R. L.
, and
Chew
,
Y. T.
,
1981
, “
The Structure of a Separating Turbulent Boundary Layer. Part 1. Mean Flow and Reynolds Stresses
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
113
, pp.
23
51
.
16.
Simpson
,
R. L.
, and
Chew
,
Y. T.
,
1981
, “
The Structure of a Separating Turbulent Boundary Layer. Part 2. Higher-Order Turbulence Results
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
113
, pp.
53
73
.
17.
Alving
,
A. E.
, and
Fernholz
,
H. H.
,
1995
, “
Turbulence Measurements Around a Mild Separation Bubble and Down-Stream of Reattachment
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
322
, pp.
279
328
.
18.
Elsberry
,
K.
,
Loeffler
,
J.
,
Zhou
,
M. D.
, and
Wygnanski
,
I.
,
2000
, “
An Experimental Study of a Boundary Layer That is Maintained on the Verge of Separation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
423
, pp.
227
262
.
19.
Goldstein, S., “Modern Developments in Fluids Dynamics,” 1965, Dover, New York.
20.
George, W. K., 1995, “Some New Ideas for Similarity of Turbulent Shear Flows,” Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, edited by K. Hanjalic and J. C. F. Pereira, Begell House, New York.
21.
George
,
W. K.
, and
Castillo
,
L.
,
1997
, “
,”
Appl. Mech. Rev.
,
50
, pp.
689
729
.
22.
Batchelor, G. K., 1966, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge Univeristy Press, London.
23.
Castillo, L., 1997, “Similarity Analysis of Turbulent Boundary Layers,” Ph.D. dissertation, SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
24.
Castillo, L., 2000, “Application of Zagarola/Smits Scaling in Turbulent Boundary Layers With Pressure Gradient,” Advances in Fluids Mechanics 3, Montreal, Canada, May 24–26, 2000, edited by M. Rahman and C. A. Brebbia, pp. 275–288.
25.
Castillo, L., Walker, D. J., and Wosnik, M., 2000, “The Effect of the Upstream Conditions on the Mean Velocity Deficit of Turbulent Boundary Layers,” Fluids 2000 Conference and Exhibit paper #AIAA2000–2309. Denver, Colorado, June 19–22.
26.
Zagarola
,
M. V.
, and
Smits
,
A. J.
,
1998
, “
Mean-Flow Scaling of Turbulent Pipe Flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
373
, pp.
33
79
.
27.
Walker
,
D.
, and
Castillo
,
L.
,
2002
, “
Effect of the Upstream Conditions on Turbulent Boudnary Layers
,”
AIAA J.
,
40
, pp.
2540
2542
.
28.
Castillo
,
L.
, and
Walker
,
D.
,
2002
, “
The Effect of the Upstream Conditions on the Outer Flow of Turbulent Boundary Layers
,”
AIAA J.
,
40
, pp.
1292
1299
.
29.
Wosnik, M., 2000, “On Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows,” Ph.D. thesis, SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
30.
Schubauer, G. B., and Klebanoff, P. S., 1951, “Investigation of Separation of the Turbulent Boundary Layer,” NACA Report 1030, NACA Technical Note 2133.
31.
Simpson
,
R. L.
, and
Strickland
,
J. H.
,
1977
, “
Features of a Separating Turbulent Boundary Layer in the Vicinity of Separation
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
79
, pp.
553
594
.
32.
Wang, X., “Similarity Analysis for Turubulent Boundary Layers Subject to Pressure Gradient and Heat Transfer,” 2003, Ph.D. dissertation, Rensslaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
33.
Wosnik, M., and George, W. K., 2000, “Reconciling the Zagarola/Smits Scaling With the George/Castillo Theory for the Zero Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layer,” 38th AIAA Ann. Atg. Reno, NV, Jan 10–13.
34.
Bradshaw, P., 1967, “The Response of a Constant-Pressure Turbulent Boundary Layer to the Sudden Application of an Adverse Pressure Gradient,” NPL Aero. Rept. 1219.
35.
Newman, B. G., 1951, “Some Contributions to the Study of the Turbulent Boundary Near Separation,” Austr. Dept. Supply Rep. ACA-53.