Randomly placed, nonuniform, three-dimensional roughness with irregular geometry and arrangement is analyzed. New correlations are presented for such roughness for determination of magnitudes of equivalent sand grain roughness size ks from a modified version of the Sigal and Danberg parameter Λs. Also described are the numerical procedures employed to determine Λs from three-dimensional profilometry data. The sand grain roughness values determined with this approach are then compared with and verified byks magnitudes determined using: (i) analytic geometry for uniformly shaped roughness elements arranged in a regular pattern on a test surface, and (ii) measurements made with nonuniform, three-dimensional, irregular roughness with irregular geometry and arrangement. The experiments to obtain these measurements are conducted using this latter type of roughness placed on the walls of a two-dimensional channel. Skin friction coefficients are measured in this channel with three different types of rough surfaces on the top and bottom walls, and agree very well with values determined using the numerical procedures and existing correlations. The techniques described are valuable because they enable the determination of equivalent sand grain roughness magnitudes, for similar three-dimensional roughness, entirely from surface geometry after it is characterized by three-dimensional optical profilometry data.

1.
Nikuradse, J., 1933, “Laws of Flow in Rough Pipes,” NACA TM 1292, National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics.
2.
Schlichting, H., 1936, “Experimental Investigation of the Problem of Surface Roughness,” NACA TM-832, National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics.
3.
Coleman
,
H. W.
,
Hodge
,
B. K.
, and
Taylor
,
R. P.
,
1984
, “
A Re-Evaluation of Schlichting’s Surface Roughness Experiment
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
106
, pp.
60
65
.
4.
Antonia
,
R. A.
, and
Luxton
,
R. E.
,
1971
, “
The Response of a Turbulent Boundary Layer to a Step Change in Surface Roughness, Pt. 1. Smooth to Rough
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
48
, Part 4, pp.
721
762
.
5.
Antonia
,
R. A.
, and
Wood
,
D. H.
,
1975
, “
Calculation of a Turbulent Boundary Layer Downstream of a Step Change in Surface Roughness
,”
Aeronaut. Q.
,
26
, Part 3, pp.
202
210
.
6.
Bettermann
,
D.
,
1966
, “
Contribution a l’Etude de la Convection Force Turbulente le Long de Plaques Rugueuses
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
9
, pp.
153
164
.
7.
Perry
,
A. E.
, and
Joubert
,
P. N.
,
1963
, “
Rough-Wall Boundary Layers an Adverse Pressure Gradients
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
17
, Part 2, pp.
193
211
.
8.
Pineau, F., Nguyen, V. D., Dickinson, J., and Belanger, J., 1987, “Study of a Flow Over a Rough Surface with Passive Boundary-Layer Manipulators and Direct Wall Drag Measurements,” AIAA Paper 87-0357, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
9.
Han
,
J. C.
,
Glickman
,
L. R.
, and
Rohsenow
,
W. M.
,
1978
, “
An Investigation of Heat Transfer and Friction for Rib-Roughened Surfaces
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
21
, pp.
1143
1156
.
10.
Furuya, Y., Fujita, H., and Nakashima, H., 1987, “Turbulent Boundary Layers on Plates Roughened by Wires in Equal Intervals,” Perspectives in Turbulence Studies, pp. 223–249.
11.
Sherif
,
N.
, and
Gumley
,
P.
,
1966
, “
Heat-Transfer and Friction Properties of Surfaces with Discrete Roughnesses
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
,
9
, pp.
1297
1320
.
12.
Pimenta, M. M., Moffat, R. J., and Kays, W. M., 1978, “The Structure of a Boundary Layer on a Rough Wall With Blowing and Heat Transfer,” ASME Paper No. 78-HT-3, AIAA-ASME Thermophysics and Heat Transfer Conference, Palo Alto.
13.
Coleman
,
H. W.
,
Moffat
,
R. J.
, and
Kays
,
W. M.
,
1977
, “
The Accelerated Fully Rough Turbulent Boundary Layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
82
, Part 3, pp.
507
528
.
14.
Ligrani
,
P. M.
, and
Moffat
,
R. J.
,
1986
, “
Structure of Transitionally Rough and Fully Rough Turbulent Boundary Layers
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
162
, pp.
69
98
.
15.
Bogard
,
D. G.
,
Schmidt
,
D. L.
, and
Tabbita
,
M.
,
1998
, “
Characterization and Laboratory Simulation of Turbine Airfoil Surface Roughness and Associated Heat Transfer
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
120
(
2
), pp.
337
342
.
16.
Abuaf
,
N.
,
Bunker
,
R. S.
, and
Lee
,
C. P.
,
1998
, “
Effects of Surface Roughness on Heat Transfer and Aerodynamic Performance of Turbine Airfoils
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
120
(
3
), pp.
522
529
.
17.
Sigal
,
A.
, and
Danberg
,
J. E.
,
1990
, “
New Correlation of Roughness Density Effect on the Turbulent Boundary Layer
,”
AIAA J.
,
28
, No.
3
, pp.
554
556
.
18.
Sigal, A., and Danberg, J. E., 1988, “Analysis of Turbulent Boundary Layer Over Rough Surfaces With Application to Projectile Aerodynamics,” Army Ballistic Research Lab, Aberdeen Proving Grounds MD, Technical Report BRL-TR-2977.
19.
Schlichting, H., 1991, Boundary Layer Theory, Seventh Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
20.
Kays, W. M., and Crawford, M. E., 1993, Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
21.
Colebrook
,
C. F.
,
1938
-1939, “
Turbulent Flow in Pipes, With Particular Reference to the Transition Between the Smooth and Rough Pipe Laws
,”
J. Inst. Civil Engineers, London
,
11
, pp.
133
156
.
You do not currently have access to this content.