Numerical simulations of the turbulent flow in an asymmetric two-dimensional diffuser are carried out using three commercial CFD codes: CFX, Fluent, and Star-CD. A low-Reynolds number k-ε model with damping functions and the four-equation v2¯f model are used; the first one is available as a standard feature in all the codes, the v2¯f model was implemented using the User Defined Routines. The flow features a large recirculating zone due to the adverse pressure gradient in the diffuser; the v2¯f predictions agree very well with the experiments both for the mean velocity and the turbulent kinetic energy. The length of the separation bubble is also computed within 6 percent of the measured value. The k-ε calculations do not show any recirculation and the agreement with the measurements is very poor. The three codes employed show very similar characteristics in terms of convergence and accuracy; in particular, the results obtained using the v2¯f are consistent in all the codes, while appreciable differences are obtained when the k-ε is employed.

1.
Freitas
,
C. J.
,
1995
, “
Perspective: Selected Benchmarks From Commercial CFD Codes
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
117
, p.
210
218
.
2.
Durbin
,
P. A.
,
1996
, “
On the k-ε Stagnation Point Anomaly
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
17
, pp.
89
91
.
3.
Launder
,
B. E.
, and
Sharma
,
A.
,
1974
, “
Application of the Energy-Dissipation Model of Turbulence to the Calculation of Flow Near a Spinning Disk
,”
Lett. Heat Mass Transfer
1
, pp.
131
138
.
4.
Durbin
,
P. A.
,
1995
, “
Separated Flow Computations with the k-ε-v2 Model
,”
AIAA J.
,
33
, pp.
659
664
.
5.
Apsley
,
D. D.
, and
Leschziner
,
M. A.
,
2000
, “
Advanced Turbulence Modeling of Separated Flow in a Diffuser
,”
Flow, Turbul. Combust.
,
63
, pp.
81
112
.
6.
Parneix
,
S.
,
Durbin
,
P. A.
, and
Behnia
,
M.
,
1998
, “
Computation of a 3D turbulent boundary layer using the v′2¯−f model
,”
Flow, Turbul. Combust.
,
10
, pp.
19
46
.
7.
Behnia
,
M.
,
Parneix
,
S.
,
Shabany
,
Y.
, and
Durbin
,
P. A.
,
1999
, “
Numerical Study of Turbulent Heat Transfer in Confined and Unconfined Impinging Jets
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
20
, pp.
1
9
.
8.
Kaltenback
,
H. J.
,
Fatica
,
M.
,
Mittal
,
R.
,
Lund
,
T. S.
, and
Moin
,
P.
,
1999
, “
Study of the Flow in a Planar Asymmetric Diffuser Using Large Eddy Simulations
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
390
, pp.
151
185
.
9.
Vandoormaal
,
J. P.
, and
Raithby
,
G. D.
,
1984
, “
Enhancements of the SIMPLE Method for Predicting Incompressible Fluid Flows
,”
Numer. Heat Transfer
,
7
, pp.
147
163
.
10.
Leonard
,
B. P.
,
1979
, “
A Stable and Accurate Convective Modeling Procedure Based on Quadratic Upstream Interpolation
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
19
, pp.
59
98
.
11.
Kim, S. E., 2001, “Unstructured Mesh Based Reynolds Stress Transport Modeling of Complex Turbulent Shear Flows,” AIAA Paper 2001-0728.
12.
Barth, T. J., and Jespersen, D., 1989, “The Design and Application of Upwind Schemes on Unstructured Meshes,” AIAA Paper 89-0366.
13.
Craft, T. J., Launder, B. E., and Suga, K., 1995, “A Non-Linear Eddy-Viscosity Model Including Sensitivity to Stress Anisotropy,” Proc. 10th Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, 2, pp. 23.19–23.24.
14.
Launder, B. E., and Spalding, D. B., 1972, Mathematical Models of Turbulence, Academic Press, London.
15.
Rodi, W., 1991, “Experience with two-layer models combining the k-ε model with a one-equation model near the wall,” AIAA Paper 91-0216.
16.
Gibson
,
M. M.
, and
Launder
,
B. E.
,
1978
Ground Effects and Pressure Fluctuations in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
86
, pp.
491
511
.
17.
Speziale, C. G., Abid, R., and Anderson, E. C., 1990, “A critical evaluation of two-equation models for near wall turbulence,” AIAA Paper 90-1481.
18.
Obi, S., Aoki, K., and Masuda, S., 1993, “Experimental and Computational Study of Turbulent Separating Flow in an Asymmetric Plane Diffuser,” Proc. 9th Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, pp. 305-312.
19.
Buice
,
C. U.
, and
Eaton
,
J. K.
,
1997
, “Experimental Investigation of Flow Through an Asymmetric Plane Diffuser,” Report No. TSD-107. Thermosciences Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
You do not currently have access to this content.